Array
(
    [content] => 
    [params] => Array
        (
            [0] => /forum/index.php?threads/what-does-the-semiconductor-shortage-mean-for-europe.17356/
        )

    [addOns] => Array
        (
            [DL6/MLTP] => 13
            [Hampel/TimeZoneDebug] => 1000070
            [SV/ChangePostDate] => 2010200
            [SemiWiki/Newsletter] => 1000010
            [SemiWiki/WPMenu] => 1000010
            [SemiWiki/XPressExtend] => 1000010
            [ThemeHouse/XLink] => 1000970
            [ThemeHouse/XPress] => 1010570
            [XF] => 2021370
            [XFI] => 1050270
        )

    [wordpress] => /var/www/html
)

What does the semiconductor shortage mean for Europe?

Daniel Nenni

Admin
Staff member
The semiconductor shortage is unlikely to disappear in the next few years. While Europe is slowly growing its semiconductor manufacturing capacity, it hasn’t yet done enough to become fully independent from external supply. How did the industry get here, and what does a protracted shortage mean for Europe’s automakers?

The semiconductor shortage pre-dates many of the supply crunches triggered by the pandemic. Since 2018, US sanctions towards China have disrupted the semiconductor supply chain. Initial tariffs targeted raw materials such as silicon wafers and became one of the factors contributing to the existing shortage.

Exacerbating the crisis in the years since is a combination of both supply- and demand-side factors. At the beginning of the pandemic, initial semiconductor demand forecasts were low, driving relative decreases and shifts in supply investments. However, due to work from home policies and associated increases in demand for consumer electronics, overall demand levels remained steady. From the supply side, long lead times and COVID lockdowns resulted in low inventory levels. As a result, heavy CapEx investments will be needed to boost the manufacturing capacities and restore supply.

Recent BCG modelling quantified the global semiconductor supply-demand gap at 9%, which is projected to decrease slightly over the course of 2023. Despite this, it will be a long and difficult road to recover the supply-demand gap, especially for the automotive industry.

The automotive industry is expected to have the highest growth (11% CAGR) of all semiconductor segments through to 2026. For comparison, consumer electronics is projected to grow by 4%, while smartphones will see only 2%. At this rate, the auto semiconductor market will grow to US$84bn, representing 11% of the total semiconductor market (US$767bn) by 2026. To fulfil this demand, manufacturing capacities need to increase, which may take years.

Naturally, semiconductor manufacturers are responding to the shortages and planning to increase capacities. However, capacity development plans of semiconductor manufacturers differ between technology generations, also referred to as node size in nm.

According to SEMI projections, the largest installed capacity increases in 2023 are going to happen for technology nodes below 16nm, which are not currently used in automotive industry. The relevant technology nodes, such as the 40nm node widely used in automotive MCUs as well as general purpose non-automotive MCUs, are only projected to increase by 4% in capacity next year. For comparison, a 25% capacity increase is forecast for advanced (5-7nm) nodes used in smartphones.

Automotive Industry.jpg


The automotive industry is expected to have the highest growth (11% CAGR) of all semiconductor segments through to 2026

Looking to the situation in Europe, the semiconductor shortage has already heavily impacted the continent, with vehicle production dropping by 2.3 million units in 2021 against initial expectations. This loss accounts for 24% of globally lost vehicles and makes Europe one of the most impacted regions alongside North America, which accounts for 25% of the losses. Furthermore, Europe has exposed its high dependency on external players in the semiconductor market, namely China, Korea, Taiwan and the US. While the recovery from the shortage in principle can still happen with the status quo, that exposed vulnerability calls for action.

With the European Chip Act, European fabs expansions, and Intel’s plans to build fabs in Germany (bringing €33bn (US$35bn) of Intel investments), there is hope that Europe may become less dependent on the external supply. However, fab construction and ramp up can currently take four to five years, so any new high-volume manufacturing (HVM) capacity from the constructed plants will only be seen in 2027.

Additionally, the Chip Act’s €45bn investment might not be sufficient if Europe wants to build a more complete portfolio of fabs, including advanced technology nodes, front and back end. For reference, it takes more than €20bn for an established player to build one advanced fab and more than €5bn to build an expansion of the existing fab.

Another concern for Europe’s semiconductor manufacturing is the potential energy crisis: sometimes a single advanced lithography system consumes 3,0000kWh per day. The share of energy cost in the total fab cost is already fairly high at around 10%, rising to 20% this year and leading to TSMC consuming 6% of Taiwan’s entire power consumption. Can Europe afford such high energy consumption? The question is yet to be answered.

For European automakers this all has big implications. To secure sufficient supply to meet forecasted demand levels, automotive players will need to have a clear understanding of their future semiconductor demand. This will mean identifying specific areas of high risk down to individual semiconductors based on manufacturing capacity bottlenecks and purposely designing a futureproof and resilient semiconductor portfolio.

 
Kinda curious - when the big players choose to build these fabs (subsidies aside) in places like EU to support EU demand.. How long in the future are they expecting heavy usage of these fabs? Do they need a business case for 5 years? 10 years?

..

The demographics situation for EU and China both look a bit rough when you go a decade out — the populations are aging quickly, and consumption reduces with age..

Likewise for automotive, the “explosion” in semi conductor need will be here for a while as we transition to EVs.. but eventually the demand could subside if EVs end up lasting a lot longer than petrol vehicles / the need to own your own vehicle decreases if someone actually gets AI driving working fully.

In both cases though I think the need for more fabs easily checks out for the next 10 years.
 
Daniel, you and other reporters should spend a bit of time really looking into the announced EU Chip Act, start separating facts from fiction and do not take press releases as a reliable source of information. Everybody talks about 45B€ without reading the relevant, public, official papers and taking info only from press offices.

Currently, the budget that the EU Commission can put on the Chip Act is of the order of 4B€ until 2027. This is fixed by the fact that the Commission budget is attributed by Member States in cycles of 6-7years and is, at best, updated at mid period. As the Commission do not raise money independently (one only exception until now) they cannot put more than that on the table as that is what is already there. Moreover, no one euro of that can go financing production capacity building, as all the countries without fabs will be vetoing it. The announced 45B€ are just the wishful thinking based on the fact that Member State will finance the initiative with a leverage ratio of about 1-2€ national for 1€ EU and that then the Industry will then match at 3 to 1 the sum of public money. This is how a lot of schemes have worked in the past.

The matching national funds are those that will finance most of the fabs: at the moment Germany for Intel in Magdeburg and maybe TSMC in Dresden, France for GF/ST in Grenoble, Italy for ST in Catania and Agrate and maybe for Intel (IFX in Austria/Villach-Germany/Dresden possible too). This means that at best the fabs will be funded by those three Member States. As Member State Aid is subjected to EU approval, the EU can only say no or delay the process, certainly not speeding it up or contribute to it as it will break the internal market rules (see Mrs. Vestager declarations in Davos ...), no matter the wishes of Mr.Breton.

Given the situation and what emerges from national parliaments approved budgets, the likely scenario is roughly and possibly 8B€ public money in Germany over 5 years, 3B€ in France and 2B€ in Italy.
I stress again that only this money can go for production capacity, however some will have to go towards initiatives where EU can put their 4B€: the pre-competitive R&D for which they were already scheduled.
So you have 4+4=8B€ for R&D and with the usual 30% State aid you have about 9+27=36B€ for industrial investment (assuming the industry really cough up the 27, in particular Intel).
Magically 8+36=44B€ and you can have a nice title "45B€ for semi the EU Chip Act".....
Ok, this is a simplification as there will be smaller amounts from some other Member State for some local activities, so take into account a possible 10% error margin here and there.
The 8B€ will be the equivalent of the 15B€ for R&D in the US Chip Act while the 9B€ of Member States are the 35B$ for the Industrial investments. So between half and one fourth of what US is putting as bait on the table and without considering IRA.

Europe it is where it is, production wise, also because subsidies and tax rebates here are much lower than in US even if salaries are higher there.

Xebec, yes all calculations are made with a lifetime of the investment of 10 years.
Do not worry about demographics, history shows that when it becomes a real problem one cannot maintain the walls at the borders of the empire and the poorer, hungrier and younger neighbours cannot be stopped any more ;)
 
Kinda curious - when the big players choose to build these fabs (subsidies aside) in places like EU to support EU demand.. How long in the future are they expecting heavy usage of these fabs? Do they need a business case for 5 years? 10 years?

..

The demographics situation for EU and China both look a bit rough when you go a decade out — the populations are aging quickly, and consumption reduces with age..

Likewise for automotive, the “explosion” in semi conductor need will be here for a while as we transition to EVs.. but eventually the demand could subside if EVs end up lasting a lot longer than petrol vehicles / the need to own your own vehicle decreases if someone actually gets AI driving working fully.

In both cases though I think the need for more fabs easily checks out for the next 10 years.

"Do they need a business case for 5 years? 10 years?"

Obviously the new TSMC Arizona fab got Apple, AMD, and Nvidia's commitments and concessions. Otherwise TSMC can't force them to use a fab located in US by ignoring the cost and supply chain issues.

Same situation will apply to a foundry's fab in Europe. Why NXP, Infineon, or STMicroelectronics want to give up their freedom to choose a TSMC's fab somewhere in the world? What would it take for them to commit to a Europe based fab for the next 5 to 10 years?

It's all possible but the commitment and concessions from fabless companies and their customers must be in place before the foundry's fab location announcement.

Intel's mindset is different from a pure play foundry. The Intel IDM side of thinking may make them to believe a new European fab is more feasible than a pure play foundry's evaluation will tell.
 
I think it means that Europe will be getting more fabs.

There is no shortage on 300mm legacy nodes (40nm-90nm), but 200mm shortage is monstrous (lead times in years), and no new 200mm equipment is coming — that is as certain as laws of nature.

The most probable scenario for 200mm shortage is for old product lines to just slowly die out, and for mainland fabs which spotted 200mm opportunity early to make ton of money.

Old ICs are mostly a bane of budget car models, because they have very, very long manufacturing runs, and they can use decades old commodity parts. Not $100k V12 Benz, where they may be fine with putting $30 microcontrollers for each button, or funding R&D/crash-tests to replace old ICs.



We had a client from Pakistan who got into trouble because their air conditioner OEM control boards they were getting from China were using very old Japanese MCUs from early nineties (Panasonic, and NEC models which you can't even google up today), which went EOL because Renesas fab force-majeured.

They still got tons of outdoor blocks of split AC systems in their inventory, but no indoor modules because the can't get that control board that is compatible with outdoor blocks.

The original firmware source codes were lost decades ago, and no documentation of intentionally scrambled protocol existed, so they were stuck very good, and they had no cash whatsoever to fund re-engineering because they operated with single digit margins as a budget brand.
 
Last edited:
Daniel, you and other reporters should spend a bit of time really looking into the announced EU Chip Act, start separating facts from fiction and do not take press releases as a reliable source of information. Everybody talks about 45B€ without reading the relevant, public, official papers and taking info only from press offices.

Currently, the budget that the EU Commission can put on the Chip Act is of the order of 4B€ until 2027. This is fixed by the fact that the Commission budget is attributed by Member States in cycles of 6-7years and is, at best, updated at mid period. As the Commission do not raise money independently (one only exception until now) they cannot put more than that on the table as that is what is already there. Moreover, no one euro of that can go financing production capacity building, as all the countries without fabs will be vetoing it. The announced 45B€ are just the wishful thinking based on the fact that Member State will finance the initiative with a leverage ratio of about 1-2€ national for 1€ EU and that then the Industry will then match at 3 to 1 the sum of public money. This is how a lot of schemes have worked in the past.

The matching national funds are those that will finance most of the fabs: at the moment Germany for Intel in Magdeburg and maybe TSMC in Dresden, France for GF/ST in Grenoble, Italy for ST in Catania and Agrate and maybe for Intel (IFX in Austria/Villach-Germany/Dresden possible too). This means that at best the fabs will be funded by those three Member States. As Member State Aid is subjected to EU approval, the EU can only say no or delay the process, certainly not speeding it up or contribute to it as it will break the internal market rules (see Mrs. Vestager declarations in Davos ...), no matter the wishes of Mr.Breton.

Given the situation and what emerges from national parliaments approved budgets, the likely scenario is roughly and possibly 8B€ public money in Germany over 5 years, 3B€ in France and 2B€ in Italy.
I stress again that only this money can go for production capacity, however some will have to go towards initiatives where EU can put their 4B€: the pre-competitive R&D for which they were already scheduled.
So you have 4+4=8B€ for R&D and with the usual 30% State aid you have about 9+27=36B€ for industrial investment (assuming the industry really cough up the 27, in particular Intel).
Magically 8+36=44B€ and you can have a nice title "45B€ for semi the EU Chip Act".....
Ok, this is a simplification as there will be smaller amounts from some other Member State for some local activities, so take into account a possible 10% error margin here and there.
The 8B€ will be the equivalent of the 15B€ for R&D in the US Chip Act while the 9B€ of Member States are the 35B$ for the Industrial investments. So between half and one fourth of what US is putting as bait on the table and without considering IRA.

Europe it is where it is, production wise, also because subsidies and tax rebates here are much lower than in US even if salaries are higher there.

Xebec, yes all calculations are made with a lifetime of the investment of 10 years.
Do not worry about demographics, history shows that when it becomes a real problem one cannot maintain the walls at the borders of the empire and the poorer, hungrier and younger neighbours cannot be stopped any more ;)

Good explanation, thank you. To me the US CHIPs Act is great PR for the semiconductor industry and a nice gift if you get some. There are so many companies with their hands out I really don't think it will make a big dent in fab construction costs. We shall see.

TSMC would not have built in AZ without customer support. The same thing for Germany and Japan. Government money is a bonus. If a Government wants a fab just lean on the customers of said fab, that is where the money is.
 
I think a more important take from this is that semiconductor industry is that ship which has sailed.

It's not near impossible to run a semiconductor company as an SME, let alone trying to enter it now as SME.

130nm/180nm tapeouts on 200mm were the only option which worked for very low volume manufacturers before, but now 200mm may be either 12m+ lead times, or cost as much as a 300mm tapeout.

Manufacturers whose volumes will never reach MOQs needed for 300mm in their lifetimes are now genuinely thinking about selling their businesses.
 
Last edited:
The semiconductor shortage is a global issue that has impacted many industries and regions, including Europe. Semiconductors are essential components used in a wide range of electronic devices, including smartphones, computers, and automobiles. The shortage has been caused by a combination of factors, including increased demand for electronic devices, disruptions in supply chains due to the COVID-19 pandemic, and geopolitical tensions. The semiconductor shortage has had a significant impact on the European automotive industry.

Many automakers have been forced to halt production due to the shortage of semiconductors, resulting in a significant decrease in sales and revenue. This has also led to a shortage of new cars in the market, causing prices to rise and further affecting consumer demand. In addition to the automotive industry, the semiconductor shortage has also affected other industries in Europe, including consumer electronics and telecommunications. Companies that rely heavily on semiconductors for their products have faced supply chain disruptions and have struggled to keep up with demand.

The European Union has recognized the importance of the semiconductor industry and has taken steps to support its development. In December 2020, the EU launched the European Chips Act, which aims to boost semiconductor production yield and innovation in Europe. The Act includes measures such as increasing investment in research and development, improving the regulatory framework, and supporting the growth of small and medium-sized enterprises in the sector.

In conclusion, the semiconductor shortage has had a significant impact on Europe, particularly on the automotive industry. However, the EU has taken steps to address the issue and support the development of the semiconductor industry in the region.
 
Back
Top