2. Term limits on Congress (2 terms)(Constitutional amendment, they won't do it themselves)
According to my federal rep, and I did speak with him personally, since the election of Trump, 70% of these people in congress are new people. So, if your plan would work, then we should be seeing some positive result. But as he pointed out, Pelosi will block (from getting a vote), anything she does not like and she does not like anything the Republicans have to offer. Again, according to him.
Likewise, he continued, we have a rule where we (republicans) give up our chairs on the committees (I forgot to write down the time intervals), but the Democrats do not do this.
Our previous federal rep, who was not reelected (before the districts were redrawn from where we got our current career politician/rep), pointed out that what happens in congress and what is reported in the press are two different things. Challenged on why he was standing against an independent investigation of Trump during his town-hall meeting, he responded that to appoint a independent investigator, which eventually happened, would signal that he was not competently fulfilling his duties in office. He said that Trump had been investigated thoroughly multiple times.
But why stop at the federal level? How about the local level?
As pointed out by one of our current sitting school board members, we have a 36% grade level literacy in my county. This number, though lower than normal, is representative of how we score normally. "Teachers," I have been told, "Treat this county as a practice job. All of their mistakes are made here. The good teachers then leave for other, more prestigious areas, like private schools or other counties."
So if 70%, a high majority, doesn't make a different, how would term limits better the situation?
If a bad politician would leave after 2 terms, a good one would have to do the same, so you don't solve anything, you just keep shuffling and then loosing even when you win because you have to kick the good politicians out.
Now you might ask what I'm getting at. I'm pointing out that it's not a law that "will save us." You can't regulate bad decision making, nor evil. It's just not possible. Even machines, which don't suffer from the human error factor, are programed by us; who give them erroneous programming as it is our nature to err.
PS: And an error is easier to correct that someone's intention desire to cause harm to the (US) people.