Array
(
    [content] => 
    [params] => Array
        (
            [0] => /forum/index.php?threads/alarm-is-sounded-after-tsmc-becomes-%E2%80%98ussmc%E2%80%99-global-times-editorial-humor.17172/
        )

    [addOns] => Array
        (
            [DL6/MLTP] => 13
            [Hampel/TimeZoneDebug] => 1000070
            [SV/ChangePostDate] => 2010200
            [SemiWiki/Newsletter] => 1000010
            [SemiWiki/WPMenu] => 1000010
            [SemiWiki/XPressExtend] => 1000010
            [ThemeHouse/XLink] => 1000970
            [ThemeHouse/XPress] => 1010570
            [XF] => 2021370
            [XFI] => 1050270
        )

    [wordpress] => /var/www/html
)

Alarm is sounded after TSMC becomes ‘USSMC’: Global Times editorial (HUMOR)

Daniel Nenni

Admin
Staff member
TSMC of USA.jpeg


In front of the reality that Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) is turning into “USSMC,” the explanation of Taiwan island’s Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) authorities is feeble. On Tuesday, TSMC held a “relocation ceremony” for its first plant in Arizona. And Washington treated it “with due respect.” Together with Secretary of Commerce Gina Raimondo, US President Joe Biden visited the new plant and claimed in his speech that what is happening in Arizona “matters across the country and around the world.” But no matter how Washington performs, it will be a key event marking a dark turn in the development history of the global semiconductor industry.

TSMC founder Morris Chang said at the ceremony that globalization and free trade are “almost dead.” While he may imply something else, the words coming from the founder of a highly globalized leading company are a meaningful and precise footnote to the building of TSMC’s new US plant. Moreover, Biden claiming “American manufacturing is back” in his speech at the ceremony is a huge irony. How is American manufacturing back? Isn’t TSMC a company that has been developing well in China’s Taiwan island?

No matter how the US and the DPP authorities cover it up, it doesn’t change the nature of the matter: Washington is using tricky ways to force the enterprise of our Taiwan region that occupies an important position in the world’s core high-tech industry to move to the US. Washington said a lot of inflated praise to welcome TSMC’s arrival, but the core, from beginning to end, is only about “US interests.” Almost nothing is mentioned about whether the two sides can achieve a win-win situation or whether it contributes to the global chip industry. And the US cannot mention this because this is not a natural result of the market at all. Political pressure from Washington and subsidies and inducements are throughout the construction of TSMC’s plant in the US.

It is also an alarm to the world, and we need to ring it louder. The US didn’t just do it to TSMC. It can also use TSMC as an example to oppress chip companies of other countries that are still hesitant and attract the manufacturing industry back to the US. For Washington, this is a deal that is sure to make profits, no matter economically or politically.

The US brutally forces its way into the world initially dominated by the rules of the market, just like a bull breaking into a porcelain store, disrupting rules and order. If it is true, as Chang said, that globalization and free trade are “almost dead,” then the US is clearly the culprit.

Compared with the selfish and arbitrary US, the DPP authorities are even more shameful. Not only do they have no resistance to US’ behavior of hollowing out Taiwan, but they act proactively, with their words and actions full of servility to Washington. And the wealth accumulated by Taiwan society over the past few decades has been squandered by the DPP as proof of allegiance to win Washington’s trust. From the reauthorization of ractopamine-enhanced pork imports from the US to the case of TSMC, there have been more and more such examples in recent years. However, if Taiwan is really hollowed out, the DPP’s value in Washington will significantly shrink. Isn’t it easier to be abandoned?

The DPP authorities argued that this is a good thing. We want to ask the DPP authorities: Is it a good thing to force TSMC to cut off its business on the Chinese mainland, causing its revenue to decline? Is it a good thing to relocate thousands of TSMC’s top engineers to the US, resulting in the largest migration of talent in Taiwan’s semiconductor industry? TSMC’s total investment in building a factory in the US will reach $40 billion, which is one of the largest foreign investments in US history. But is it a good thing when this happens while Taiwan’s society and economy face the “chronic blood loss” crisis? Since the precedent has been set, will the US just quit after getting the benefit? Who are you kidding?

TSMC, which takes up half of the global chip manufacturing industry, has factories all over the world, and it definitely has the right to choose where to set up factories and invest.

However, setting up a factory in the US is obviously not just about doing business. Chang said that his company’s attempt to build a factory in the US turned into a nightmare. How did the nightmare suddenly turn into a dream? Just eight months ago, Chang publicly stated that US’ attempt to grow its domestic chip production will be “a wasteful, expensive exercise in futility” because of the lack of talent and prohibitively high costs.

Regarding the opening of the new plant in Arizona, some US officials said it “could give a decisive edge to the American military and economy at a time when competition with China is heating up.” This obviously gets to the bottom of the matter.

As the old saying goes, “Twisted melon is not sweet.” In order to contain the development of China’s semiconductor industry, the US has done whatever it takes, but the bitter melon it wrung out will eventually be eaten by others. It is such a sorrow.

 
Last edited:
With all due respect, do we need to spend our precious time on an article published by the CCP's mouthpiece "newspaper"?

With so many wrong English translation and wrong information in this article, the more discussion we spend on it, the more legitimacy and relevance it will receive due to the Internet search algorithm.
 
As the global times is a CCP mouthpiece this is highly likely a tactic by the CCP to stoke division within both Taiwan domestically and between taiwan and the U.S
 
With all due respect, do we need to spend our precious time on an article published by the CCP's mouthpiece "newspaper"?

With so many wrong English translation and wrong information in this article, the more discussion we spend on it, the more legitimacy and relevance it will receive due to the Internet search algorithm.

Sorry, I thought it was funny.
 
It's hard to believe. But 20%-30% of people in Taiwan believe CCP's propaganda. It really works.
Tiktok could be gradually doing the same thing to our next generation.
 
View attachment 978

In front of the reality that Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) is turning into “USSMC,” the explanation of Taiwan island’s Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) authorities is feeble. On Tuesday, TSMC held a “relocation ceremony” for its first plant in Arizona. And Washington treated it “with due respect.” Together with Secretary of Commerce Gina Raimondo, US President Joe Biden visited the new plant and claimed in his speech that what is happening in Arizona “matters across the country and around the world.” But no matter how Washington performs, it will be a key event marking a dark turn in the development history of the global semiconductor industry.

TSMC founder Morris Chang said at the ceremony that globalization and free trade are “almost dead.” While he may imply something else, the words coming from the founder of a highly globalized leading company are a meaningful and precise footnote to the building of TSMC’s new US plant. Moreover, Biden claiming “American manufacturing is back” in his speech at the ceremony is a huge irony. How is American manufacturing back? Isn’t TSMC a company that has been developing well in China’s Taiwan island?

No matter how the US and the DPP authorities cover it up, it doesn’t change the nature of the matter: Washington is using tricky ways to force the enterprise of our Taiwan region that occupies an important position in the world’s core high-tech industry to move to the US. Washington said a lot of inflated praise to welcome TSMC’s arrival, but the core, from beginning to end, is only about “US interests.” Almost nothing is mentioned about whether the two sides can achieve a win-win situation or whether it contributes to the global chip industry. And the US cannot mention this because this is not a natural result of the market at all. Political pressure from Washington and subsidies and inducements are throughout the construction of TSMC’s plant in the US.

It is also an alarm to the world, and we need to ring it louder. The US didn’t just do it to TSMC. It can also use TSMC as an example to oppress chip companies of other countries that are still hesitant and attract the manufacturing industry back to the US. For Washington, this is a deal that is sure to make profits, no matter economically or politically.

The US brutally forces its way into the world initially dominated by the rules of the market, just like a bull breaking into a porcelain store, disrupting rules and order. If it is true, as Chang said, that globalization and free trade are “almost dead,” then the US is clearly the culprit.

Compared with the selfish and arbitrary US, the DPP authorities are even more shameful. Not only do they have no resistance to US’ behavior of hollowing out Taiwan, but they act proactively, with their words and actions full of servility to Washington. And the wealth accumulated by Taiwan society over the past few decades has been squandered by the DPP as proof of allegiance to win Washington’s trust. From the reauthorization of ractopamine-enhanced pork imports from the US to the case of TSMC, there have been more and more such examples in recent years. However, if Taiwan is really hollowed out, the DPP’s value in Washington will significantly shrink. Isn’t it easier to be abandoned?

The DPP authorities argued that this is a good thing. We want to ask the DPP authorities: Is it a good thing to force TSMC to cut off its business on the Chinese mainland, causing its revenue to decline? Is it a good thing to relocate thousands of TSMC’s top engineers to the US, resulting in the largest migration of talent in Taiwan’s semiconductor industry? TSMC’s total investment in building a factory in the US will reach $40 billion, which is one of the largest foreign investments in US history. But is it a good thing when this happens while Taiwan’s society and economy face the “chronic blood loss” crisis? Since the precedent has been set, will the US just quit after getting the benefit? Who are you kidding?

TSMC, which takes up half of the global chip manufacturing industry, has factories all over the world, and it definitely has the right to choose where to set up factories and invest.

However, setting up a factory in the US is obviously not just about doing business. Chang said that his company’s attempt to build a factory in the US turned into a nightmare. How did the nightmare suddenly turn into a dream? Just eight months ago, Chang publicly stated that US’ attempt to grow its domestic chip production will be “a wasteful, expensive exercise in futility” because of the lack of talent and prohibitively high costs.

Regarding the opening of the new plant in Arizona, some US officials said it “could give a decisive edge to the American military and economy at a time when competition with China is heating up.” This obviously gets to the bottom of the matter.

As the old saying goes, “Twisted melon is not sweet.” In order to contain the development of China’s semiconductor industry, the US has done whatever it takes, but the bitter melon it wrung out will eventually be eaten by others. It is such a sorrow.

Wow..."China’s Taiwan island". Not a possession of China.
 
It's hard to believe. But 20%-30% of people in Taiwan believe CCP's propaganda. It really works.
Tiktok could be gradually doing the same thing to our next generation.
Indeed, communist propaganda is powerful. But it is becoming more and more absurd.
This is why they need tools like Tiktok to destroy any sign of intelligence/thinking from target audience.


For example lot of people in EU supports Putins war efforts.
War support in Russia was over 80% and cracks started to form only after "partial" mobilization.
 
It is pretty odd to hear Morris Chang say globalization and free trade are “almost dead.” considering that TSMC would be worth a lot less in a divided world.
 
It is pretty odd to hear Morris Chang say globalization and free trade are “almost dead.” considering that TSMC would be worth a lot less in a divided world.
Morris likes to turn up the contrast. In the semiconductor world, he does have a point, in many ways. In other industries, globalization seems alive and well, like it or not.
 
Last edited:
Why would TSMC be worth less in a divided world? For defense alone, countries will print the money.

Why is the EU/France putting money into the same 22nm FDSOI process as Germany? Why would they are try to be the same.
Why is India putting money into 28nm for the future?
Hint: Expect huge tariffs everywhere.

There was a movie in the 1960's called "Dr. Strangelove: How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love Inflation" Something like that.
 
Why would TSMC be worth less in a divided world? For defense alone, countries will print the money.

Why is the EU/France putting money into the same 22nm FDSOI process as Germany? Why would they are try to be the same.
Why is India putting money into 28nm for the future?
Hint: Expect huge tariffs everywhere.

There was a movie in the 1960's called "Dr. Strangelove: How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love Inflation" Something like that.
Because Intel and Samsung will still exist. But instead of the three competing for 100% of the market, they would be reduced to competing for a smaller portion. Well except Samsung might straddle both markets and thus have a built in scale advantage.
 
Why will globalization vs nationalization create a smaller overall quantity of revenue?
Globalization is a game of efficiency. The US is best in class for aviation and very good at telecomm, design engineering, and the chemicals industry. China is good at reasonably high quality cheap metallurgy and optimizing/operating efficient factory production lines. By focusing on one everyone gets better and cheaper products. For example China makes the Al for a 747 as well as the planes interior. These are just as good as anything a US firm could have built, but they are cheaper, allowing Boeing to make a cheaper more accessible plane. Boeing also designs and builds this plane in the US that will be cheaper and better than anything a Chinese company could make (due to their scale and better design team). These are the general principles behind globalization that have caused the huge economic boom post ww2, and made almost all (if not literally all) nations richer.
 
Back
Top