Array
(
    [content] => 
    [params] => Array
        (
            [0] => /forum/index.php?threads/manufacturing-costs-amd-versus-intel.9401/
        )

    [addOns] => Array
        (
            [DL6/MLTP] => 13
            [Hampel/TimeZoneDebug] => 1000070
            [SV/ChangePostDate] => 2010200
            [SemiWiki/Newsletter] => 1000010
            [SemiWiki/WPMenu] => 1000010
            [SemiWiki/XPressExtend] => 1000010
            [ThemeHouse/XLink] => 1000970
            [ThemeHouse/XPress] => 1010570
            [XF] => 2021370
            [XFI] => 1050270
        )

    [wordpress] => /var/www/html
)

Manufacturing costs: AMD versus Intel

lefty

Active member
The die sizes of Intels new Skylake-X and Xeon CPUS have been estimated on Anandtech:
10-core LCC: 308mm2
18-core HCC: 473mm2
28-core XCC: 677mm
AMD has only one die (Zeppelin) which is 194 mm2 and they combine it in an MCM.
The MCM packages is 2 die's for Threadripper and 4 dies for Epyc.
My question is which is cheaper to manufacture (assuming GloFlo's 14nm is equally mature as Intel's 14nm+)?
I think larger dies are going to have lower yields, but also maybe packaging for MCM is more expensive?
Any of the experts here like to have a guess?
 
Back
Top