BannerforSemiWiki 800x100 (2)

Semiconductor Packaging (3D IC) Emerging As Innovation Enabler!

Semiconductor Packaging (3D IC) Emerging As Innovation Enabler!
by Daniel Nenni on 01-29-2012 at 4:00 pm

The ASIC business is getting more and more complicated. The ability to produce innovative die at a competitive price to solve increasingly complex problems just isn’t enough. The technology required to package that die is now front and center.

Here, at the junction of advanced design, process technology and state-of-the art packaging is where real innovation takes place. Perhaps nowhere does the importance of advanced packing technology, such as System in Package (SIP) and emerging 2.5D and 3D capabilities, become clearer than when you talk with the team at Global Unichip Corporation (GUC) who is emerging as a leader in the newly defined “Flexible ASIC” space.

Before jumping into a packaging discussion, it is important to define “Flexible ASIC.” At GUC, Flexible ASIC defines what they do: Provide access to foundry design environments to reduce design cycle time, provide custom IP and design methodologies to lower the barrier to entry, and integrate it all (design, foundry, assembly and test) for faster time–to–market. And that is where the emphasis on advanced packaging technology comes in.

The trend toward SiP (System in a Package) has been brought about because of the need to cram more and more flexibility into a smaller and smaller footprint to satisfy the demand of today’s 24/7 always connected electronic consumer. While this is clearly a great strategy, the challenges can be overwhelming. Here’s what the packaging experts have to say:

  • First there is the issue of “known good die.” As more chips are integrated into a single package, the challenge of maintaining cost/effective yield grows almost exponentially.
  • Then too, the design has to take in three dynamics … chip, package, and ultimately the board.
  • Perhaps most critical are the thermal considerations created by stacking more die into a single package.


Two of the ways that GUC overcomes these challenges is through its Integrated Passive Device (IPD) technology, which is currently available, and a state-of-the art implementation of Through Silicon Via (TSV) Interposer Technology which will be available shortly.

Using IPD technology, GUC successfully integrated some of the stand alone passive components. In the example below, GUC reduced passives by 50% and integrated both DPX and BPF. Total package size was reduced 31% from 10mm x 10mm to 8.8mm x 7.8mm and package thickness was reduced 17%.

One of the barriers to the more advanced 2.5D IC technology is cost, and while the process is not mature at this point sometimes the TSV on interposer is a significant cost consideration.

While solving that thorny conundrum, GUC has been working on the technology for five years, the company is also making significant progress toward pure 3D ICs. What makes 3D IC technology distinctive from its 2.5 D cousin is that pure 3D ICs have their TSV structures running direct to the chip area rather than to the interposer. GUC estimates that true 3D IC production is still a year or two off.

Despite the daunting challenges, GUC claims that providing an SiP approach accounts for around 25% of all new projects and 30% of its revenues. The company has shipped over 17 million SiP units targeting applications in consumer, wireless, network and computer applications. Furthermore, the company is finding a niche for what it calls “Ultra Large SiP” with package dimension over 50mm x 50mm.

Some of the more pessimistic pundits long ago declared the ASIC era dead, myself included. But clearly the complexity of providing more functionality in smaller and smaller footprints have given rise for the need of a new kind of ASIC company, a Flexible ASIC company, that can bring to the market services BEYOND design and manufacturing excellence.

That said, the real question is: What role will advanced packaging technology play in tomorrow’s innovation?




Power Issues for Chip and Board

Power Issues for Chip and Board
by Paul McLellan on 01-29-2012 at 3:39 pm

Next week there are two Apache, a subsidiary of Ansys, events. At DesignCon there are a couple of workshops on chip-package-system (CPS). In addition to Apache themselves, each of the two workshops has a number of representatives of leading edge companies doing semiconductor design. I already blogged about this in more detail here. As a general note, to find blogs about seminars, workshops, webinars and so on, click on the “seminars” button at the top of the page.

The other event, on Tuesday, is a webinar on Power Issues for Chip and Board. Brian Bailey moderates Arvind Shanmugavel, director of applications engineering for Apache, and Randy Whitel, technical marketing manager for measurement solutions from Tektronix. The first part of the webinar is pre-recorded and then there is an opportunity for live questioning of Arvind and Randy.

The summary of the webinar is:Power used to be a secondary concern when it comes to chip or system design, but with the rapid rise in importance of mobile devices, increasing chip densities, and a rise in the levels of concurrency, power consumption, power dissipation, heat dissipation, and power integrity and becoming major primary design considerations at all stages in the design flow. Many chip design techniques are making this problem more difficult, such as multiple power domains and clock gating, while high speed interfaces are creating problems with board layouts and 3D packaging techniques are raising many kinds of new challenges. Power management is an important topic for every design company to remain competitive, to increase yields and to deal with the longevity issues required for emerging industries such as automotive.

The webinar is at 10am Pacific Time on Tuesday January 31st. Registration is here. After the event, a recording of the entire webinar, including the Q&A will be available.


Arteris vs Sonics battle: remind Clausewitz!

Arteris vs Sonics battle: remind Clausewitz!
by Eric Esteve on 01-29-2012 at 1:56 pm

I have bloggedbefore Christmas about the Arteris-Sonics war, initiated by Sonics, claiming that Arteris NoC IP product was infringing Sonics patent. We had shown in this post that the architecture of Sonics interconnects IP product was not only older but also different from Arteris’ NoC architecture: the products launched initially by Sonics, in the 1995-2000 years, were closer to a crossbar switch than to a Network-on-Chip. Having done this analysis, our feeling was, because Arteris solution is fresher (2005), that Sonics’ claim against Arteris was unlikely to be justified.


The answer from Arteris, coming January 27[SUP]th[/SUP], reminds me Clausewitz well known strategy: “Attack is the best way to defend”! From Arteris’ PR:
January 27, 2012 – Arteris, the inventor and leading supplier of network-on-chip (NoC) interconnect IP solutions, today announced that it has filed a complaint alleging that Sonics’ newest product, SonicsGN (SGN), infringes Arteris patents. In addition, Arteris responded to the lawsuit that was filed by Sonics Inc. on November 1, 2011, asserting that it has not infringed the Sonics patents, and further that the Sonics patents are invalid.

Pretty tough answer, isn’t it? This is clearly a two step manoeuvre: when Sonics was funding their attack on the past (they were the first on the market, so a new comer has “certainly” infringe their old patents to compete on the same market), Arteris bases the attack on the present. The company is claiming that Sonics latest products (SGN), based on a new architecture which is now similar to Arteris NoC (just remind that Sonics initial products were “crossbar switch” like), have “necessarily” infringed Arteris’ patents (in both cases, the quote reflect my interpretation, not a certified fact). The second step is a more classical defense (Arteris has not infringe the Sonics patents), but going further when saying that the Sonics patents are invalid!

I am not a lawyer, neither a patent expert, nor a specialist of NoC architecture… that said, it would be strange that the products developed by Arteris ten years after the introduction of the first products from Sonics, based on a different concept (Network vs Crossbar Switch) and consequently a different architecture, could have used features specific to Sonics products, covered by patents. To penetrate a market already occupied –by Sonics- Arteris had to innovate, not to duplicate. Similarly, it’s attractive to think that, when Sonics, the interconnect IP market leader, has realized that Arteris was making design-in after design-in (at customers previously working with Sonics), and was going to kick them out of this market, the company decided to develop a product similar to Arteris NoC! If the market is asking for a certain kind of product, better optimized in term of power consumption, performances (latency) and wire length (layout) and if you serve this market, you just want to satisfy your customer.

By doing so, Sonics appears to be follower, the company who duplicates when the direct competitor innovates… In this market configuration, when the follower need to close the technical gap and respect a tight Time-to-Market, the risk of patent in infringement is simply higher, because you need to go fast and can’t necessarily check that every single piece of a complex design is not infringing a patent. All of the above is pure speculation (let’s call it a feeling), and may not be true. But it possibly could be true…

I am happy to see that one of the Arteris arguments in the 27th January PR was already highlighted in my previous blogon the topic, dated November 4[SUP]th[/SUP]:

“The Sonics patents asserted in its November 1, 2011 complaint are related to the old Sonics Silicon Backplane product, and do not apply to Arteris’ true network on chip technology. Crossbar technologies were used in the semiconductor industry long before the existence of any Sonics patents, when on-chip crossbar switches were developed for communications applications in the 1980’s. Conversely, Arteris network on chip interconnect IP is a distributed packet switching network which is significantly different than older crossbar-based hybrid bus technologies used in products like Sonics’ SonicsSX (SSX) and SonicsLX (SLX).“

These few sentences synthesizes the problematic of the Sonics vs Arteris case: the historical player (Sonics) on the Interconnect IP market has entered and created this market by using a well known, proven technology: “on-chip crossbar switch”. Then when Arteris, the challenger, came on this market ten years after Sonics, they absolutely had to innovate to have a minimum chance to be considered, and gain market share. That they did by developing a new architecture: their “network on chip interconnects IP” is a “distributed packet switching network”. Innovation has allowed Arteris to best solve customers’ issues in SoC design, and Sonics understood this very well, so they decided to recently launch new products duplicating the successful architecture for NoC…

By Eric Esteve– IPNEST


SemiWiki and Mentor Graphics Seminar Series!

SemiWiki and Mentor Graphics Seminar Series!
by Daniel Nenni on 01-28-2012 at 10:49 am

For the greater good of the semiconductor ecosystem, SemiWiki and Mentor Graphics present SemiWiki Seminars, a free seminar and software demonstration series addressing the latest innovations in IC design. SemiWiki Seminars discuss interesting new challenges and potential solutions aimed at increased circuit density and functionality, higher performance, better yield, more cost effective test, faster design cycles, and other success factors. SemiWiki Seminars demonstrate specific methods and tools for the individual designer, as well as ways to help engineers work together more effectively across a broad and diverse ecosystem.

Join us for our first event:

Effective, Secure Debugging in a Fabless Ecosystem
January 31, 11:30am – 1pm @ a one of my favorite eating spots in Silicon Valley!

For more information check out these blogs by Paul McLellan, Daniel Payne, and myself:

Semiconductor IP Security Seminar (Free Lunch!)
Now that design revolves around intelectual property, IP security is a top concern of fabless semiconductor companies around the world. Modern SoC design and manufacturing requires geographically distributed teams and companies, such as EDA vendors, design houses, foundries, packaging houses, and other partners within the eco-system.

EDA Vendors Providing Secure Remote Support for an IC Design Flow
In my last corporate EDA job I had customers in Korea that were evaluating a new circuit simulator and getting strange results. When I asked, “Could you send me your test case?” the reply was always, “No, we cannot let any of our IC design data leave the building because of security concerns.”

Imera Virtual Fabric
Anyone who has worked as either a designer or as an EDA engineer has had the problem of a customer who has a problem but can’t send you the design since it is (a) too big (b) the company’s crown jewels and (c) no time to carve out a small test case. I’ve even once had a bug reported from the NSA where they were not even allowed to tell us what the precise error message was (since it mentioned signal names).

Agenda

  • Introduction by Daniel Nenni
  • Imera Presentation (by Bruce Feeney (15 minutes))

[LIST=|INDENT=1]

  • Who is Imera?

    [INDENT=2]Secure connections for collaboration with suppliers and partners
    [INDENT=2]Security, Export Control and Legal Compliance
    [INDENT=2]Statement of the problem we’re trying to solve

    [LIST=|INDENT=1]

  • Real-world Applications of Imera’s Products

    [INDENT=2]Remote source code debug
    [INDENT=2]Remote critical issue support
    [INDENT=2]Secure engineering collaboration

    • MGC Customer Support Presentation (30 minutes)

    [LIST=|INDENT=1]

  • How does Mentor use Imera in troubleshooting Calibre using remote debug and why, etc.
  • Demo of secure debug solutions

    [INDENT=2]Overview w/ benefits
    [INDENT=2]Use Case # 1 – Troubleshooting a SR between Support Engineer with customer
    [INDENT=2]Use Case # 2 – Debugging a DEI with Support Engineer, Customer, and R&D Engineer

    • Q & A (10-15 minutes)

    I look forward to seeing you there!


  • Premier International Gathering for … Application Developers!

    Premier International Gathering for … Application Developers!
    by Daniel Nenni on 01-27-2012 at 8:53 pm


    For the greater good of the semiconductor ecosystem, I have agreed to Co-Chair the 2012 International Conference on Engineering of Reconfigurable Systems and Algorithms (ERSA), the “Premier International Gathering for Commercial and Academic Reconfigurable Computing Application Developers”, July 16-19, 2012, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA.


    ERSA
    is a part of WORLDCOMP Congress bringing together more than 2,000 attendees from over 85 countries around the world. Companies, participating at ERSA/WORLDCOMP, get their products and organizations in front of this large number of attendees and countries.

    The ERSA Industrial Session (ERSA-IS) will assemble a coordinated research and commercial meeting held in same location and dates. It provides a forum between academic researchers and commercial entrepreneurs from developed countries and emerging economic markets.

    ERSA-IS facilitates communication among researchers and entrepreneurs from different sides of world and brings them closer together in same location and dates. This something that is very expensive to do any other way. It provides a meaningful return on investment that companies can evaluate – trading off one or two expensive trips for one trip and sponsorship of ERSA-IS.

    ERSA-IS is looking for attendees (researchers, developers, entrepreneurs, etc) from emerging market countries: Brazil (South America), India, and China (Asia), as well as from developed countries in North America and Europe.

    Las Vegas is a brilliant place to host an event like this. Las Vegas has a reputation for bringing technology oriented businesses together (CES) and is accessible from around the world. The longer-term goal is to establish the Industrial Developers’ Forum with thousands of attendees during next years.

    ERSA-IS Hot Topic:

    “Reconfigurable Computing Application Development for Heterogeneous Run-time Environments”

    Focus on challenges, tools, available technologies, and opportunities when it comes to developing and supporting applications, both academic and commercial, which involve reconfigurable computing systems, including mobile, heterogeneous and hybrid technology platforms for complex, intelligent embedded systems.

    ERSA-IS Proposed Featured Sessions:

    • Developing heterogeneous systems (CPU plus FPGA) using the OpenCL standard
    • Developing IP cores and scalable libraries for heterogeneous systems
    • Hardware security and trust in reconfigurable heterogeneous systems

    I strongly encourage companies, developers, entrepreneurs to arrange demos, exhibitions, talks, presentations etc., and to be sponsors for ERSA-IS. I strongly encourage employers, developers, students, and researchers to attend.

    Companies may host half or full day seminars to introduce and demonstrate their new technologies and products.

    Sponsor ERSA and raise your visibility, and show your support for advancing reconfigurable systems algorithms and systems in both academic and commercial applications!

    For sponsorship details, visit: Sponsorship Levels

    Conference Chair:
    Dr Toomas P Plaks

    London
    Contact the Chair

    Las Vegas is an incredible location, this will be an excellent experience, I hope to see you there!


    How Is Your IC Design Flow Glued Together?

    How Is Your IC Design Flow Glued Together?
    by Daniel Payne on 01-25-2012 at 2:36 pm

    Most IC designers I talk to really enjoy the creative process of developing a new SoC design, debugging it, then watching it go into production. They don’t really like spending time learning how to make their EDA tools work together in an optimal IC design flow where they may have a dozen tools each with dozens of options. Fortunately for Synopsys tool users there is now a short-cut offered in the form of the Lynx Design System, which has already captured the digital design flow so you can focus on design instead of CAD integration.
    Continue reading “How Is Your IC Design Flow Glued Together?”


    The Semiconductor Landscape In A Few Years?

    The Semiconductor Landscape In A Few Years?
    by Daniel Nenni on 01-25-2012 at 9:48 am

    Looking at the huge gap between the revenue of semiconductor design and manufacturing (~$300B) and that of EDA tools, services and silicon IP combined (~6B) inspired me to look more deeply into the overall arena of semiconductors in today’s context and possibly decipher some trends which should emerge in near future. Although this gap in revenue always existed, in the realm of SoCs and ever increasing complexity on a single wafer over last few years, the gap seems to be justified and may open up new chapters in the semiconductor arena. I have been watching the developments in this space for a few years and the industry seems to be at an inflexion point. This prompted me to write this article.

    In the backdrop of ever increasing demand for higher density at lower nodes, thereby increasing most intricate design and process rules and manufacturability, it is evident that designs need to be much closer to manufacturing. Some of this is being addressed by semiconductor IPs which are specialized components targeted at particular nodes. Possibly due to this, the IP business has increased to much extent, rightly pointed by Eric Esteve in his Jan 2012 article, that Q311 silicon IP revenue ($568M) has surpassed the overall revenue of CAE ($566M). With the geometry reduction, power became critical which took the front seat thus giving rise to High K metal gate and vertical gate or FinFET transistors in technology and several CAE techniques such as concept of power domain over clock gating and so on. There are other manufacturing complexities, e.g. reducing metal pitch giving rise to coupling effects and signal integrity issues, at 20nm and below this asks for double and higher patterning technique which in turn asks for new routers to accommodate different masks for the same layer. After all one common theme emerging is that lower geometry (20nm and below) made to work can give rise to large saving in area and power as well as can provide very high speed. For increasing capacity and possibly reducing assembly complexity, 3D ICs are on the horizon.

    Now let us look at the economic and business scenario in this arena. Foundries have led the way for semiconductor technology development, so definitely they need to be the largest share holders. Then comes some of the dominant application players, wireless is the largest growing and in that market Qualcomm is the giant with huge cash reserves. However, Qualcomm does not have a foundry and hence it has to share its profit margin with foundry. Samsung has its presence in home appliances, entertainment, and smart phone and so on. Then there are memory and storage players like Micron and ST. A very important, Silicon IP is an element spread across everywhere with ARM being a dominant player in that space. Then there is EDA, CAE, serving all of these spaces as per their needs. While large technology advancement has taken place and more is being done, economic pressure has increased. Multiple players have increased in each of these spaces and purchasing power of a consumer has decreased, there by resulting into depressed profit margins, mostly in single digit. Definitely there is a case of consolidation in each of these spaces. What looks to be obvious is that high-end foundries combined with design will be the leader in the overall semiconductor landscape. Following are some of the possible scenarios I can think of –

    Foundries – Intel and TSMC will lead the way being ahead in the process node compared to the rest and hence taking advantage of enabling high-end SoCs. Samsung, Global Foundry and SMIC are there to follow.

    Appliances, Storage
    – Home appliances, automotive, Entertainment – Samsung, Micron, and ST will remain the leaders.

    Wireless and mobile application
    – Qualcomm will continue to lead the way. It needs to find the way to reduce or eliminate margin paid to the foundry and that could bring a large surprise considering the money power Qualcomm has.

    Semiconductor IP
    – This is a brain child which will continue growing in design IP space. The processor dominant, ARM can grow further and communication IP player Qualcomm will continue growing. Other IP players can consolidate with ARM and Qualcomm.

    EDA
    – Synopsys, Cadence and possibly Mentor will continue their lead in EDA tools space. Quite often it has been felt that an EDA company should get a share in the chip produced by its tool. However the important point to note here is that an EDA company does not provide any design IP, it provides tools which get driven by the foundry requirements. Hence in broader sense EDA is a service to foundry, the new technology in foundry drives the enhancements into EDA tools to cater to those needs or accommodate them. Moreover in SoC age, the design is more and more IP and foundry driven. It makes sense for EDA tools to work in association with foundries. When foundries will consolidate, then it will not be a surprise if major players like Intel and TSMC acquire big EDA players like Synopsys, Cadence and Mentor.

    I did not talk about computing space, PC, notebook etc. With the arrival of iPad and mediaTablet, that space will be led by the experts like Apple, Intel, and IBM and so on. Of course in the overall eco system and design chain, there will remain multiple players in every domain, but they will operate as services to the consolidated giants.

    By Pawan Kumar Fangaria


    Apple blows away their numbers

    Apple blows away their numbers
    by Paul McLellan on 01-24-2012 at 11:38 pm

    Well it looks like everyone (including me) was way too conservative about Apple’s iPhone sales last quarter. Analysts were expecting Apple to sell 30M iPhones and 13M iPads. In fact they sold 37M iPhones, almost a quarter more than expected, and over 15M iPads. In fact Apple sold more iPads than HP, the largest PC manufacturer, sold PCs. Yes, that’s an apples-oranges comparison but it is clear that the tablet market will have a real impact on the PC market as we move into the post-PC world. And Apple didn’t do badly in that space either, selling 5.2M Macs too.

    Apple have now sold 350M iOS devices, 62M of them (nearly 20%) in Q4 of last year alone. I still think that last quarter was somewhat anomalous following the low Q3 numbers since a lot of people waited for the iPhone 4S. The market share numbers seem to be Apple at 43% and Android at 47%. Respected analysts are still predicting that WP7 phones (mainly through Nokia) will surpass iPhone sales in a couple of years but I’m not sure I find that credible.

    On their call Apple said that there were supply chain limitations during the quarter and so presumably they could have sold even more iPhone and iPads.

    Apple is now the #1 computer manufacturer by volume, nearly the number #1 by revenue (HP is still a bit bigger) and may well be the most valuable company in the world tomorrow when the market opens and it is expected, as it did for a short time last year, to surpass Exxon-Mobil. They are sitting on nearly $100B in cash. They are also now the largest purchaser of semiconductors in the world at $17B (according to Gartner).

    To put Apple’s achievement in perspective, they grew revenue by $47B in 2011 versus 2010. That’s like creating an Intel from scratch in one year (Intel should be a bit over $50B).


    Apple’s Blowout Earnings: Welcome to 2012!

    Apple’s Blowout Earnings: Welcome to 2012!
    by Ed McKernan on 01-24-2012 at 11:00 pm

    Apple’s blowout earnings for the quarter that just ended has huge ramifications for the entire semiconductor industry as suppliers align much closer to them or figure out how to minimize the damage that is to come through the rest of 2012. The immediate implication is that Wall St. will likely toss to the sidelines any semiconductor vendor or Foundry that is not clearly in the Apple Camp today or in the very near future. On a second and more important note, this enhances my confidence that Intel will be supplying silicon to Apple by the end of the year and has put in place a multi-year processor development partnership.

    In the past quarter, Apple was able to close the gap with Android smartphones by increasing iphone market share by 17% (see graph to the right). The likelihood is that they are on the path to exceeding Android sometime in the next two quarters. Combined with the strong growth in iPAD’s and the MAC PC line, Apple has carved out a position that will be hard to assail. Looking at the stock prices of various semiconductor vendors after Apple reported, one sees that Qualcomm and Broadcom are viewed as big beneficiaries. On the flip side, nVidia was down as their market opportunity with Tegra in phones and tablets will now shrink. In addition, they will now have to battle AMD for Apple’s MAC PC business.

    As mentioned in several previous blogs (hereand here), Intel’s large capex spending in 2011 to build out 22nm and this year’s even larger CAPEX to build two new 14nm fabs, thus doubling capacity, can only be logical if they have Apple as a customer. In addition, the huge 21% increase in Intel’s R&D budget is likely to go beyond the development of purely x86 processors and 4G/LTE baseband communications chips. Apple has plenty of reasons to want to leverage an Intel relationship. First and foremost it must reduce the risk of depending only on Samsung and secondly, there is a lot Intel can offer in terms of future processor design and technology.

    Last summer, I speculated that a joint x86-ARM processor effort between Apple and Intel that supports simultaneous iOS and OS-X operating systems running on Tablets and MAC Air PCs could be in the works. The benefit to the user is to allow the iOS to run most of the time (non-Office Mode) for best battery life and fastest response time. With the x86 functionality, it would be possible for Apple to sell into the corporate world a much higher costing tablet that meets the check box of both iOS applications plus Office Applications and therefore blunt a Windows 8 tablet attack coming from PC manufacturers like Dell and HP starting late 2012. Dell and HP’s only roadblock to keeping Apple out of corporate would be gone and in fact would be at a disadvantage with the lack of iOS applications support on their tablets. Suddenly the corporate world makes a shift to Apple. Microsoft will be the big loser.

    For consumers, the story also gets stronger as Apple offers the same CPU but with the x86 disabled for entry-level models. With a click of a button on iTunes users will be given the opportunity to upgrade at a reasonable price point that provides generous margins to Apple. The reconfiguration will be done remotely of course.

    Apple, as one can see, is in the drivers seat and although they are now the most valuable company in the world in terms of market cap, they have just begun to tap into the rich veins of the consumer and corporate computing markets. To get where they are going, they will need to enter into (if they haven’t already) a heavy engineering collaboration with Intel on new processors on the leading edge process combined with the latest packaging technology. This collaboration must be in place for new processors that arrive 2, 4, and maybe as far as 6 years down the road to maximize impact.

    FULL DISCLOSURE: I am Long AAPL, INTC, QCOM, ALTR


    Manage Your Cadence Virtuoso Libraries, PDKs & Design IPs (Webinar)

    Manage Your Cadence Virtuoso Libraries, PDKs & Design IPs (Webinar)
    by Daniel Payne on 01-24-2012 at 5:01 pm

    Users of Cadence Virtuoso tools for IC layout and schematics can make their design flow easier by using Design Data Management tools from ClioSoft. Keeping track of versions across schematics, layout, IP libraries and PDKs can be daunting. Come and learn more about this at a Webinar hosted by ClioSoft next Tuesday.
    Continue reading “Manage Your Cadence Virtuoso Libraries, PDKs & Design IPs (Webinar)”