Webinar PQC SemiwikiV4
WP_Term Object
(
    [term_id] => 16126
    [name] => Lithography
    [slug] => lithography
    [term_group] => 0
    [term_taxonomy_id] => 16126
    [taxonomy] => category
    [description] => 
    [parent] => 0
    [count] => 159
    [filter] => raw
    [cat_ID] => 16126
    [category_count] => 159
    [category_description] => 
    [cat_name] => Lithography
    [category_nicename] => lithography
    [category_parent] => 0
)

NILS Enhancement with Higher Transmission Phase-Shift Masks

NILS Enhancement with Higher Transmission Phase-Shift Masks
by Fred Chen on 07-24-2023 at 8:00 am

NILS Enhancement with Higher Transmission Phase Shift Masks

In the assessment of wafer lithography processes, normalized image log-slope (NILS) gives the % change in width for a given % change in dose [1,2]. A nominal NILS value of 2 indicates 10% change in linewidth for 10% change in dose; the % change in linewidth is inversely proportional to the NILS. In a previous article [2], it was shown that NILS is better for a dark feature against a bright background than the other way around. Attenuated phase shift masks (attPSMs) help to improve the NILS to reach values of 2 or more, in cases where conventional binary masks can’t without an exorbitantly high dose.

Increasing the transmission of the attenuated phase shift mask [3] takes the improvement further. A higher transmission effectively makes the dark areas darker, which increases the image log-slope.

Figure 1. NILS is improved

Figure 1. NILS is improved for higher transmission of the attenuated phase-shift mask. The images are taken along the long axis of a dense oblong (1.3:1) pattern with cross-dipole illumination. The graph on the right uses the log scale instead of linear scale for the y-axis, representing intensity. The more obvious dip indicates better NILS for the higher transmission (16% vs 6%).

Besides improving NILS, the mask error sensitivity and depth of focus are also improved [3]. Improving the NILS is particularly important for improving the resolution of 2D shapes such as in Figure 1 or in the header above this article. For the 12% attPSM of Ref. 3, a square feature width of 65% of pitch with cross-dipole illumination (for tightest 2D resolution: dipole illumination in X + dipole illumination in Y) just manages to hit a NILS of 2.0 in both x and y. This is another opportunity to improve 2D resolution for DUV, especially for core patterning for self-aligned double patterning (SADP) [4].

References

[1] C. A. Mack, “Using the Normalized Image Log-Slope,” The Lithography Expert, Microlithography World, Winter 2001: http://lithoguru.com/scientist/litho_tutor/TUTOR32%20(Winter%2002).pdf

[2] F. Chen, “Phase-Shifting Masks for NILS Improvement – A Handicap for EUV?”, https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/phase-shifting-masks-nils-improvement-handicap-euv-frederick-chen

[3] T. Faure et al., “Development of a new high transmission phase shift mask technology for 10 nm logic node,” Proc. SPIE 9984, 998402 (2016).

[4] H. Yaegashi et al., “Overview: continuous evolution on double-patterning process,” Proc. SPIE 8325, 83250B (2012).

This article first appeared in LinkedIn Pulse: NILS Enhancement with Higher Transmission Phase-Shift Masks

Also Read:

Assessing EUV Wafer Output: 2019-2022

Application-Specific Lithography: 28 nm Pitch Two-Dimensional Routing

A Primer on EUV Lithography

Share this post via:

Comments

2 Replies to “NILS Enhancement with Higher Transmission Phase-Shift Masks”

You must register or log in to view/post comments.