100X800 Banner (1)

Does Subsystem IP will finally find a market? ARC based sound subsystem IP is on track…

Does Subsystem IP will finally find a market? ARC based sound subsystem IP is on track…
by Eric Esteve on 04-05-2012 at 4:03 am

Will the launch of ARC based complete sound system IP by Synopsys ring the bell for the opening of a new IP market segment, the “Subsystem IP”? If you look at the IP market evolution, starting from standard cell libraries and memory compiler offering in the 1990’s, moving to commodity functions like UART or I2C in the late 1990’s to finally come to complexes functions offer in the 2000’s, the long list of standard based PCI, PCIe, USB 2.0, SATA and more, and if you start brainstorming, you will likely think that subsystem IP should be the next step. Your customers, the SoC integrators, have to fill IC with more and more function, the technology make it possible (think 40 or 28nm) and their customer ask for it. But the time to market (TTM) pressure, especially in market like wireless or consumer electronic, is so strong that the design team has to integrate more functions, in a technology more difficult to manage, that the “lego” solution (building a complete system by integrating – not designing- various subsystems) looks very attractive. Then, you think that subsystem IP is the ideal solution!

Synopsys offering of a sound subsystem IP is based on a complete solution: H/W, S/W, FPGA and Virtual prototyping availability. The hardware piece is articulated around a single or dual core ARC Audio Processor, highly configurable, and this is an important point, as SoC integrators always need to differentiate. If they want to provide an ultra low power solution, they will implement the solution running at 10 MHz frequency, when the 800 MHz solution will allow for performance differentiation. As well, a SoC integrator will decide to implement a very low footprint (0.2 sq mm in 40nm) version, if the goal is to release a low cost, low area SoC. But, in both case, ARC based subsystem IP, will be a complete, drop-in solution.

Because the market segments targeted are CE or Wireless, with applications like Set-Top-Box (STB), HDTV, handset or smartphone and multimedia, all of these requiring to provide sound capabilities (which can be pretty advanced like surround sound or multi-channel), but for which the sound features are not the core competencies of the chip maker, benefiting for a drop-in solution can make sense to complete the SoC integration on line with the TTM requirement. In other words, the Subsystem IP provider is not in competition with the SoC design team. The sound system is one of the features that the SoC needs to support, but not the most important feature of the SoC you are designing. Adopting such a drop-in solution accelerates TTM, does not compete with the design team core competencies (avoid NIH syndrome) and is a way to minimize risk: you integrates a pre-verified function.

When designing a SoC for smartphone or STB application, you can’t afford taking the risk of a re-spin of the chip, because of the TTM pressure, using a pre-verified solution is one of your key requirement (even if it’s not always possible to do so). Offering a pre-integrated, pre-verified and still configurable sound subsystem IP is a good way to minimize the risk associated with this part of the design. Again because of the TTM pressure, you will need to develop the software in parallel with the SoC development and prepare for the validation of the full system as soon as possible (it’s not unusual to spend one year or more to run the validation of complexes application processors like OMAP5 or Snapdragon). FPGA based prototypes (HAPS based hardware prototyping) will allow to accelerate software development, and virtual prototyping to speed up the complete system validation phase, so you don’t need to wait for SoC prototypes release to start working on the SoC validation.

The semiconductor industry is a place where creativity is welcomed, as soon as creative thinking will allow making more money. It’s an industry where some “crazy” ideas like Microprocessor concept have leaded to create huge market starting from scratch, and also an industry where brilliant ideas like the Transputer (a pioneering microprocessor architecture of the 1980s, featuring integrated memory and serial communication links, intended for parallel computing, designed and produced by Inmos) or closer to us, the concept of an ASIC platform, pre-integrating multiple functions as well as field programmable blocks (FPGA areas), have finally failed. Subsystem IP is a brilliant idea. Will this concept meet the market demand? I honestly don’t know the answer, but that I can say is that Synopsys has tried to bring a complete solution, based on H/W, S/W and prototype offering, increasing the likelihood of success.

From Eric Estevefrom IPnest


Intel’s Fait Accompli Foundry Strategy

Intel’s Fait Accompli Foundry Strategy
by Ed McKernan on 04-05-2012 at 1:09 am

As many analysts have noted, it is difficult to imagine what Intel’s foundry business will look like one, two or even three years down the road because this is all new and what leading fabless player would place their well being in the hands of one who is totally new at the game. I would like to suggest there is a strategy in place that will soon lead to tectonic shifts in the semiconductor world. The assembled pieces of “no-name” startup chip companies building in Intel’s advanced 22nm trigate process include Achronix, Tabula and now Netronome. Each represent three possible solutions to high performance data path processing that may lead to Intel’s goal of dominance in the combined server, storage, networking platform. Or, perhaps they may serve as a forcing function for leading Altera, Xilinx, Broadcom, Marvell or Cavium away from TSMC and partnering with Intel. Either outcome is a win for Intel.

For much the past three years the spotlight has shined brightly on everything that is mobile – as it should have. Questions about Intel’s ability to either counter Apple’s ARM based mobile rise or to be its eventual supplier across the board will be on every analysts mind until there is resolution. However, there is another side to Intel’s business that is not well understood. Intel always fights a multi-front war to maximize its advantage and overwhelm competitors without similar magnitudes of resources. Only Intel, historically, has been able to do this.

Today, while it charges ahead with its Medfield processor in the smartphone and tablet space to blunt ARM’s early lead, Intel enters a mopping up phase in the PC market with its Ivy Bridge based Ultrabooks that will neuter AMD and nVidia in what will be the highest volume segment by the end of 2013. And in the background Intel has opened up a third front against the foundries of TSMC, Global Foundries and Samsung who the ARM Camp depends on to win the Mobile Tsunami Marketplace. Without a process within spitting distance of Intel, ARM would be relegated to trailing edge embedded SOCs. Therefore Intel will leverage its Fabs to peel away Foundry customers, cutting off oxygen that pays for future capital expenditures at leading nodes.

The announcements that FPGA startups Achronix and Tabula are utilizing Intel’s 22nm process technology had some guessing where were Xilinx and Altera. With Netronome, the question could be where is Cavium and the Netlogic RMI group acquired by Broadcom. All attack the data processing path that Intel needs to fill out the networking platform. The acquisition of Fulcrum last summer and QLogic’s Infiniband group provide critical functions that should be able to leverage 22nm at the expense of Broadcom and Marvell’s switch chips and Mellanox Infiniband chips.

As Andy Bechtolsheim, the former Sun founder and Google investor and now running Arista, a startup building low-latency high performance switches, said the era of ASIC based switch chips is over. The inevitable march towards merchant Ethernet silicon is on and who can build the fastest chips accessing the latest technologies wins. The Fulcrum acquisition seems to preclude Broadcom and Marvell from a Foundry slot unless they were to sign away product rights.

Traction by Achronix or Tabula could force Xilinx or Altera to seek an entry into the 22nm trigate process. Until now, both Xilinx and Altera have walled off the FPGA market to startups with their software tools, leading edge processes and robust IP. However what happens if a startup competitor gets a 3-year process technology advantage. In 2009, Altera beat Xilinx out the door by 12 months with its high end 40nm Stratix IV and ended up crushing them in the communications space, a segment that represents almost half the revenue and the majority of the profits. You have to wonder if there is any reason that they aren’t both running test wafers at Intel.

Diminishing nVidia and AMD’s stature in the PC and tablet business; pulling away a Xilinx or Altera; outrunning Broadcom and Marvell in the switch chip market all seem to be part of an overriding strategy that has yet to be communicated by Intel but is a factor in their massive capital expenditure that looks to double capacity by the end of 2013 and put some distance between them and the Foundries. If Intel out executes on the process side, then many fabless vendors may be presented with a Fait Accompli.


FULL DISCLOSURE: I am long INTC, AAPL, ALTR, QCOM


DAC Pavilion Panels

DAC Pavilion Panels
by Paul McLellan on 04-05-2012 at 12:00 am

Once again DAC has a full program of panel sessions that take place on the exhibit floor at the DAC pavilion, aka booth 310.

Gary Smith kicks off the program with his annual “What’s Hot at DAC” presentation on Monday, June 4th, from 9:15-10:15am. The rest of Monday’s pavilion panels are:

  • “Low power to the people,” a panel discussing low-power design techniques, struggles and solutions.
  • “Is life-care the next killer app?” a panel looking at where electronics and EDA is going in health, energy efficiency, safety and productivity.
  • “The mechanics of creativity,” sponsored by Women in Electronic Design, a panel looking at how we can be creative on demand and sharing stories of innovation.
  • An interview with this year’s yet-to-be-announced Marie R. Pistilli award winner. The winner will be announced on April 10[SUP]th[/SUP].

On Tuesday, the panels are:

  • “Hogan’s heroes: learning from Apple,” Jim Hogan leads a panel to look at what we can all learn from Apple, now the world’s most valuable company.
  • “Foundry, EDA and IP: Solve Time-to-Market Already!” a panel discussion on what IP, EDA and foundry vendors are doing to further reduce the time to design a modern SoC.
  • “Chevy Volt teardown.” Experts discuss what is “under the hood” of the Chevy Volt especially its 310V lithium-ion battery and its control electronics.
  • “An interview with Jim Solomon,” who has been working for decades on advancing analog design, a Kauffman award winner and founder of one of the predecessors of Cadence.
  • “Conquering New Frontiers in Analog Design – Plunging Below 28nm.” Analog no longer has the luxury of trailing a couple of process generations behind digital. This panel discusses the challenges.

Wednesday’s pavilion panels are:

  • “Town Hall: The Dark Side of Moore’s Law.” This panel looks at how to get design costs back in line with Moore’s law so that EDA and semiconductor companies can also profit.
  • “Divide and Conquer – Intelligent Partitioning.” There are many reasons to partition a huge design. This panel looks at all the issues surrounding partitioning decisions. It’s moderated by me.
  • “Real World Heterogeneous Multicore.” Almost all cell-phones feature multiple processors of different types: CPUs, GPUs, DSPs. This panel discusses the issues.
  • “Teens talk tech” where, once again, high-school students tell us how they use the latest tech gadgets, and what they expect to be using in three to five years.
  • “Hardware-Assisted Prototyping & Verification: Make vs. Buy?” Emulators are expensive, but building a custom FPGA prototype has its own set of challenges. This panel discusses the tradeoffs.

Full details of all the pavilion panels are on the DAC website here.


GSA Silicon Summit at the Computer History Museum!

GSA Silicon Summit at the Computer History Museum!
by Daniel Nenni on 04-04-2012 at 9:52 pm

The first GSA Silicon Summit will address the complexity, availability and time-to-market challenges that the industry must overcome to enable low power, cost effective solutions to keep pace with Moore’s Law. With never ending customer demand of better, faster and cheaper, semiconductor manufacturers must continually push their technology processes to ensure that they are providing higher density, lower power, and faster processing speeds. This event will evaluate the predominant process technologies that are leading the industry to meet this demand.

APRIL 26th, 2012

Computer History Museum
1401 Shoreline Blvd.
Mountain View, CA 94043

REGISTER NOW!

Program

[TABLE] cellpadding=”5″ style=”width: 100%”
|-
| align=”center” valign=”top” | Time
| valign=”top” | Item
|
|-
| align=”center” valign=”top” | 8:00 a.m.
| valign=”top” | Registration/Networking Breakfast
|
|-
| align=”center” valign=”top” | 9:00 a.m.
| valign=”top” | Opening Remarks
|
|-
| align=”center” valign=”top” | 9:00 a.m.
| valign=”top” | Keynote Address: Keeping Moore’s Law AliveDr. Subramanian S. Iyer, IBM Fellow and Chief Technologist, Microelectronics Division, IBM
|
|-
| align=”center” valign=”top” | 9:30 a.m.
| valign=”top” | Keynote Address: Advancements in CMOS Technologies
Subramani Kengeri, Head of Advanced Technology Architecture, Office of the CTO, GLOBALFOUNDRIES
|
|-
| align=”center” valign=”top” | 10:00 a.m.
| valign=”top” | Panel Discussion: Extending the Life of CMOS Moderator:Dr. Roawen Chen, Vice President, Manufacturing Operation, Marvell Semiconductor, Inc.
Panelists:
|
|-
| align=”center” valign=”top” |
|

  • Jim Aralis, Chief Technology Officer and Vice President, R&D, Microsemi

|
|-
| align=”center” valign=”top” |
|

|
|-
| align=”center” valign=”top” |
|

  • Shung Chieh, Vice President, Technology Development, Aptina Imaging

|
|-
| align=”center” valign=”top” |
|

  • Matt Crowley, Vice President, Hardware Development, Tabula

|
|-
| align=”center” valign=”top” |
|

|
|-
| align=”center” valign=”top” | 11:00 a.m.
| colspan=”2″ valign=”top” | [TABLE] style=”width: 100%”
|-
| Networking Break
Sponsored by True Circuits
| align=”right” |
|-

|-
| align=”center” valign=”top” | 11:15 a.m.
| valign=”top” | Keynote Address: The Case for SOI TechnologyJean-Marc Chery, Executive Vice President and Chief Manufacturing & Technology Officer, STMicroelectronics
|
|-
| align=”center” valign=”top” | 11:45 a.m.
| valign=”top” | Keynote Address: The Revolutionary Scope of Multi-Gate Transistors Dr. Chenming Hu, TSMC Distinguished Chair Professor of Microelectronics, University of California, Berkeley
|
|-
| align=”center” valign=”top” | 12:15 a.m.
| valign=”top” | Lunch
|
|-
| align=”center” valign=”top” | 12:45 p.m.
| valign=”top” | Keynote Address: The Multidimensional Landscape Nick Yu, Vice President, Engineering, Qualcomm
|
|-
| align=”center” valign=”top” | 1:15 p.m.
| valign=”top” | Panel Discussion: 3D ICEcosystem Collaboration

Moderator:Mark Brillhart, Vice President, Technology and Quality, Cisco Systems, Inc. Panelists:
|
|-
| align=”center” valign=”top” |
|

  • Raman Achutharaman, Corporate Vice President, Strategy & Marketing, Silicon Systems Group, Applied Materials

|
|-
| align=”center” valign=”top” |
|

  • Liam Madden, Corporate Vice President, FPGA Development and Silicon Technology, Xilinx

|
|-
| align=”center” valign=”top” |
|

  • David McCann, Senior Director, Packaging R&D, GLOBALFOUNDRIES

|
|-
| align=”center” valign=”top” |
|

  • Stephen Pateras, Senior Director, Marketing, Silicon Test Division, Mentor Graphics

|
|-
| align=”center” valign=”top” |
|

  • Rich Rice, Senior Vice President, Sales & Engineering, ASE

|
|-
| align=”center” valign=”top” | 2:15 p.m.

| valign=”top” | 3D IC Working Group Meeting

|
|-

Keynote Address: Keeping Moore’s Law Alive
To sustain Moore’s Law, the industry’s brightest minds have explored the boundaries of technology and innovation to boost computing power at the 22nm and beyond. The stand-out solutions include 2.5D/3D ICs, SOI technology and 3D transistors. This keynote will address how these multiple technologies will further business’ growth and competitive edge in the near future.

Keynote Address:Advancements in CMOS Technologies

Contrary to the belief of some industry pundits that are driven by today’s digital age, the advancement of CMOS technology continues to enable the creation of leading-edge electronics by sustained scalability, accelerated time-to-market and higher yield. This keynote will showcase the resilient lifespan that CMOS performance exhibits today through technical improvements, surpassing its physical and economical limits.

Panel Discussion: Extending the Life of CMOS

Employing CMOS for the next generation of high-performance applications can be challenging, but companies continue to incorporate new process technologies that allow them to continue to maximize the use of CMOS to solve power and scaling issues. This panel session will debate the strengths and weaknesses of the solutions that advance this technology through analyzing the cost trade-offs of their technical merits and other factors, ultimately providing a snapshot of the technologies’ market impact.

Keynote Address: The Multidimensional Landscape

The buzz surrounding 2.5D/ TSV-based 3D technology is gaining momentum in the mainstream market, as more and more companies explore its cost and performance benefits and commit to tackling its technical and non-technical barriers. This keynote will address the breakthrough advances in multidimensional technology and forecast its long-term roadmap.

Keynote Address: The Case for SOI Technology

With significant technical gains in power and performance, SOI is a time-tested technology poised to enable the next generation of processors. This keynote will discuss how SOI technology will enable technological innovation and that will influence the ecosystem in new mobile, data, and consumer applications.

Keynote Address: The Revolutionary Scope of Multi-Gate Transistors

Gordon Moore calls the FinFET/Trigate transistor the most radical shift in semiconductor technology in over forty years. What are the advantages of the multigate FinFET? What makes it scalable to 10nm and single digit nm? What new opportunities are presented by it and its cousin, the ultra-thin-body UTBSOI transistor? This keynote will address the game-changing impact the introduction of multi-gate transistors will have on today’s products.

Panel Discussion: 3D IC Ecosystem Collaboration

The anticipated arrival of 3D ICs is on track for 2013, and as with any unproven technology, the cost, yield and logistical uncertainties are high if a coherent supply chain is not implemented quickly. While the technology continues to progress, the industry is working toward aligning the business goals of chip companies, foundries, packaging/assembly houses and so on. This panel session will discuss what must be accomplished within the supply chain before the debut of 3D ICs, from a standards and technical standpoint.


U2U Mentor Users’ Group

U2U Mentor Users’ Group
by Paul McLellan on 04-04-2012 at 10:58 am

Mentor’s U2U user group meeting in Santa Clara is next week on April 12th at the Santa Clara Marriott. For those of you on the east coast the Waltham U2U is on May 16th, and for Europeans the Munich U2U will be on October 25th. Registration is open for both Santa Clara and Waltham, and there is a call for papers for Munich.

The day starts with Wally Rhines keynote at 9am. I think Wally must have an entire organization doing nothing but produce keynotes since he does a lot, and each one is completely different. They tend to be full of interesting data and so, as a geek, I enjoy them immensely. There is no published title yet but I’ll be there anyway.

That is followed by a second keynote from Sameer Halpete, VP of VLSI Engineering, NVIDIA: Superphones to Supercomputers: The Quest for a Trillion Transistor SOC.

After lunch there is a panel session on 3D-IC, clearly one of the hot topics at the moment. We can go out (double patterning, EUV, e-beam) or up (2.5D, 3D) and probably both. On the panel are:

  • Don Kurelich of Mentor (moderator)
  • Paul D. Franzon of North Carolina State University
  • Ruebin Fuentes of Amkor Technology
  • Riko Radojcici of Qualcomm
  • Matthew Hogan of Mentor

From the keynotes until lunch and for the rest of the afternoon after the 3D panel there are 6 parallel tracks:

  • Custom IC/AMS
  • PCB flow
  • Place and route
  • Silicon test and yield analysis
  • Functional verification
  • Calibre

The day wraps up with a closing reception and if you fill in your feedback card you can win an iPad (one of the new ones).

Registration is free. The registration page is here. Lunch is provided.


How Co-design of MEMS-IC Saves Time

How Co-design of MEMS-IC Saves Time
by Daniel Payne on 04-04-2012 at 10:18 am

I learned about MEMS layout automation at a webinar in December and plan to attend another webinar next week on April 10thwhere two companies have created a MEMS-IC co-design flow, Tanner EDA and SoftMEMS. The big challenge is to ensure that the MEMS and electronic parts of a new design will simulate correctly before committing to production by using co-design techniques. Just doing verification of MEMS separate from verification of the IC will not guarantee that the combined MEMS-IC will function, so you have to use co-design. By simulating the complex interaction between MEMS-IC you can verify correct operation, that’s why co-design saves time by getting the system correct the first time instead of multiple iterations.

Co-Design Tool Flow
Basic MEMS layout is done with the L-Edit tool from Tanner EDA, then SoftMEMS has added extensions to L-Edit for MEMS-specific layout tasks. Here’s what the overall co-design tool flow looks like:

This co-design flow has the crucial analysis steps to validate that both MEMS and IC are simulating correctly prior to production.


Layout Editing in MEMS Pro

Webinar Objectives
· Creation of 3D models of devices from Tanner EDA’s L-Edit layout for virtual prototyping
· Creation of MEMS-specific layouts using SoftMEMS extensions to L-Edit
· Links to 3D FEM/BEM simulators – such as ANSYS, COMSOL, Oefelie
· Simulation of MEMS/electronics using T-Spice with SPICE, Verilog-A and C-code
· Modeling of packaging effects on MEMS sensors
· MEMS-specific design rule checking

Tanner EDA
In the co-design flow the tools from Tanner EDA are: W-Edit, S-Edit, T-Spice, LVS, L-Edit, DRC.

SoftMEMS
Dr. Mary Ann Maher founded SoftMEMS in 2004 however before that she worked at Tanner EDA where the MEMS Pro tools where developed in 1997. Her company headquarters are in Los Gatos, CA and they have goups in both Grenoble, France and Cairo, Egypt. This France/Egypt connection reminded me of how Mentor Graphics acquired Anacad in Grenoble which also has a group in Egypt.

Webinar Details

This webinar is free however you do have to signup for it. Attend on Tuesday, April 10th at 8:30AM Pacific (11:30AM Eastern). If the webinar on MEMS-IC co-design looks like an interesting approach for your projects then you can consider evaluating the Tanner EDA tools at no cost.


Jasper Asian Seminars

Jasper Asian Seminars
by Paul McLellan on 04-04-2012 at 1:38 am

Jasper has three seminars coming up in May in Hsinchu (Taiwan), Beijing and Shanghai. These are full-day seminars on how to solve critical verification challenges using state-of-the-art formal technology. Breakfast and lunch will be served.

This full-day tutorial will be given by technical experts for verification experts and will cover, among other things:

  • Formal verification of RTL blocks
  • Debug and design exploration
  • Post-silicon debug and root cause analysis
  • Verification of ARM-protocol based SoCs (AXI, AMBA, AHB, ACE)
  • Verification of SoCs with complex memory sub-systems (DDRxx)
  • Verification of designs including power-management structures
  • SoC and IP connectivity
  • Control status registers
  • Closure and coverage
  • Clock domain crossing
  • X-propagation


May 15 Hsinchu Taiwan

Sheraton Hotel
No. 265, Dong Sec. 1,
Guangming 6th Rd
Zhubei City 302
To register for this seminar contact Kay Lan at phone: 866-3-5739968 x21 email kay@kaviaztech.com


May 17 Beijing, China

Park Plaza Hotel
No. 25, Zhichun Road
Haidian District
Beijing
To register for this seminar contact 8610.8280-0729 ext. 8001 email bingfeng@ops-eda.com

May 18 Shanghai, China
Parkyard Hotel
No. 699, Bibo Road
Zhangjiang District
Shanghai
To register for this seminar contact 8610.8280-0729 ext. 8001 email bingfeng@ops-eda.com

Details of the seminars in Chinese are here.


ARM big.LITTLE Virtual Platforms

ARM big.LITTLE Virtual Platforms
by Paul McLellan on 04-03-2012 at 7:11 pm

You have probably heard something about ARM’s big.LITTLE architecture. This links a Cortex-A15 multi-core CPU with a Cortex-A7 CPU. The A15 is a high-performance processor and the A7 is a very low power processor. The basic idea is that when high-performance is required (playing a graphical video game on your smartphone, for example) then the A15 is brought into play and when high-performance isn’t needed (during a phone-call, for example) then the A7 is used. This gives the best of both worlds, a processor with high peak performance and very low average power.

It is worth noting that since the processor is often only a small part of the system, that running slowly, and thus keeping the whole system powered up for longer, is not always optimal. In some systems it is better to “race-to-halt” and run as fast as possible and then power-down the whole system until the next burst of activity.

Whether a task runs on A15 or A7 is not under control of the task, but instead it is handled dynamically by “task migration software” running underneath the operating system in a virtualization layer. So there is application software running on top of an operating system like Android running on top of a hypervisor, running on top of a multicore chip with two different performance levels. For the first time, application software at the top of the stack can have a major potential impact on power consumption (aka battery life).

The obvious answer to how to write software for any complex hardware is to use a virtual platform. The problem, as always, is availability of models. Synopsys have released a Virtualizer Development Kit (VDK) for this platform, incorporating high-speed models of the Cortex CPUs along with models of popular peripherals such as keyboard, touchscreen and ethernet. In fact they have created sort of starter kits which are virtual versions of ARM reference boards (which are not yet available in any case).

These virtual platform models are integrated with all the popular multi-core debuggers (don’t try and persuade a software engineer she can’t have the debugger she is used to) and additional instrumentation so that you can see what software is running on which core. Different systems might want different policies on this, from a high-performance system that primarily runs on A15 (big) and really only runs on A7 (little) when it is pretty much idle, to a system that runs mainly on A7 and only switches reluctantly to A15 when the A7 seems to be out of juice.

In multicore environments, virtual platforms offer some major advantages over hardware reference boards: they are deterministic and the whole system can be frozen. With multicore hardware, there is no guarantee that a bug will re-occur if the program is re-run. And if one core hits a breakpoint there is a delay before other cores can halt (“limited skid breakpoints”). With a virtual platform, rerunning the software with the same inputs will produce the same outputs, and reproduce the same bugs. And if you hit a breakpoint then all cores can be stopped to allow an in depth examination of the innards of what is going on.

The platform also allows a coarse level of power analysis, looking at the different power levels for each device depending on its state (so an LCD screen might be bright, dim or off).


Conquering the Big Data Challenges

Conquering the Big Data Challenges
by Beth Martin on 04-02-2012 at 4:38 pm

Extrapolating the trends from last 20 years to the next ten suggests that we will be implementing a trillion transistors or more by 2020. At 20nm, with the chip sizes touching billions of transistors, the age old problem of how to implement a design in the most efficient manner remains unanswered.

Continue reading “Conquering the Big Data Challenges”