Banner Electrical Verification The invisible bottleneck in IC design updated 1
WP_Term Object
(
    [term_id] => 16126
    [name] => Lithography
    [slug] => lithography
    [term_group] => 0
    [term_taxonomy_id] => 16126
    [taxonomy] => category
    [description] => 
    [parent] => 0
    [count] => 183
    [filter] => raw
    [cat_ID] => 16126
    [category_count] => 183
    [category_description] => 
    [cat_name] => Lithography
    [category_nicename] => lithography
    [category_parent] => 0
)

Self-Aligned Spacer Patterning for Minimum Pitch Metal in DRAM

Self-Aligned Spacer Patterning for Minimum Pitch Metal in DRAM
by Fred Chen on 11-23-2025 at 10:00 am

Key Takeaways

  • The patterning of features outside a DRAM cell array presents unique challenges compared to those within the array.
  • Stitched double patterning is the preferred method for patterning, but it becomes inadequate when minimum pitch drops below 40 nm.
  • EUV stochastic defectivity is a concern when minimum pitch decreases below 40 nm.
  • Self-aligned spacer patterning can be applied to minimum pitch metal features in the DRAM periphery.
  • The patterning flow for minimum pitches of 32-36 nm can utilize DUV lithography without the complexity of multiple litho-etch steps.

The patterning of features outside a DRAM cell array can be just as challenging as those within the array itself [1]. The array contains features which are densely packed, but regularly arranged. On the other hand, outside the array, the minimum pitch features, such as the lowest metal lines in the periphery for the sense amplifier (SA) and sub-wordline driver (SWD) circuits, are meandering in appearance, and the pitch is varying over a range. Stitched double patterning has been the method of choice but will not be sufficient when minimum pitch drops below 40 nm pitch [2,3]. Moreover, when the minimum pitch drops below 40 nm, EUV stochastic defectivity becomes an issue [4,5].

Self-aligned spacer patterning may be applied to the minimum pitch metal features in the DRAM periphery [6]. The sense amplifier and sub-wordline driver patterns are typically characterized by islands with minimum pitch lines meandering around them (Figure 1).

Spacer Patterning for Minimum Pitch Metal in DRAM 1
Figure 1. Examples of DRAM lowest metal layer patterns outside the array.

The wrapping of the lines around the islands does suggest similarity to the spacer wrapping around the core mandrel feature. Guided by the outline of the metal line directly wrapping around the islands, the appropriate mandrel features are shown in Figure 2.

Spacer Patterning for Minimum Pitch Metal in DRAM 2
Figure 2. Core and spacer feature for the corresponding patterns in Figure 1. The spacer is deposited over the core features and then etched back, leaving only the portions on the sidewall of the core features.

The core is then removed, leaving the spacer (Figure 3).

Spacer Patterning for Minimum Pitch Metal in DRAM 3
Figure 3. Core removal (from Figure 2), leaving the spacer.

The spacer acts as a mandrel for a second spacer, followed by filling of the remaining gaps (Figure 4). When necessary, cuts are used.

 Minimum Pitch Metal
Figure 4. Completion of the patterning with second spacer and gap-fill, plus any necessary line cuts. The second spacer is deposited over the first spacer and etched back, leaving only the portions on the sidewall of the first spacer. Then the gap-fill material is deposited and etched back or otherwise planarized. The cuts are etch masks for blocking metal trench etching or direct breaks etched into the metal lines.

The patterning flow is similar to the self-aligned quadruple patterning (SAQP) used for pitch quartering [7]. Thus, for 32-36 nm minimum metal pitches, this can be expected to allow DUV lithography to be used without the heavy processing burden of multiple litho-etch (LE) steps.

References

[1] F. Chen, Application-Specific Lithography: Sense Amplifier and Sub-Wordline Driver Metal Patterning in DRAM.

[2] F. Chen, Stitched Multi-Patterning for Minimum Pitch Metal in DRAM Periphery.

[3] S-M. Kim et al., “Issues and Challenges of Double Patterning Lithography in DRAM,” Proc. SPIE 6520, 65200H (2007).

[4] Y. Li, Q. Wu, Y. Zhao, “A Simulation Study for Typical Design Rule Patterns and Stochastic Printing Failures in a 5 nm Logic Process with EUV Lithography,” CSTIC 2020.

[5] F. Chen, Predicting Stochastic EUV Defect Density with Electron Noise and Resist Blur Models.

[6] F. Chen, Triple Spacer Patterning for DRAM Periphery Metal.

[7] H. Yaegashi et al., “Overview: Continuous evolution on double-patterning process,” Proc. SPIE 8325, 83250B (2012); DOI: 10.1117/12.915695.

Also Read:

FPGA Prototyping in Practice: Addressing Peripheral Connectivity Challenges

An Insight into Building Quantum Computers

I Have Seen the Future with ChipAgents Autonomous Root Cause Analysis

Share this post via:

Comments

There are no comments yet.

You must register or log in to view/post comments.