You are currently viewing SemiWiki as a guest which gives you limited access to the site. To view blog comments and experience other SemiWiki features you must be a registered member. Registration is fast, simple, and absolutely free so please, join our community today!
If you use Sigrity in a non-Cadence flow (Apache, CST, Mentor, Synopsys, Zuken) then there may be some reason for concern because in the past large EDA vendors have been known to stall, delay or outright cancel 3rd party agreements. Yes, the press release does address this and promises support for third-party integrations...
1) In package-level SI and PI analysis, Cadence encouted a powerful competitor, Ansys, also Sigrity are eating Cadence's market share. To survie, Cadence have to by Sigrity technologies.
2) In board-level SI analysis, now Cadence's SQ is out of gas, so they need new Sigrity technology to compete against Mentor's Hyperlynx suite
Why Sigrity sell?
1) They have much competitors in this niche market. It's very difficult to expand thier market share.
2) Designers prefer the solution to support analysis in design,not do analysis after design. A standalone SI or PI tool is difficult to survie.
I guess next consolidatin may be happaned between Agilent and Mentor Graphics, or CST.
I agree that the SI/PI market is crowded with many EDA vendors so consolidation makes a lot of sense. The only down side is that with every acquisition come lay-offs.