Array
(
    [content] => 
    [params] => Array
        (
            [0] => /forum/threads/new-intel-ceo.22268/
        )

    [addOns] => Array
        (
            [DL6/MLTP] => 13
            [Hampel/TimeZoneDebug] => 1000070
            [SV/ChangePostDate] => 2010200
            [SemiWiki/Newsletter] => 1000010
            [SemiWiki/WPMenu] => 1000010
            [SemiWiki/XPressExtend] => 1000010
            [ThemeHouse/XLink] => 1000970
            [ThemeHouse/XPress] => 1010570
            [XF] => 2021770
            [XFI] => 1050270
        )

    [wordpress] => /var/www/html
)

New Intel CEO

Artificer60

Well-known member
1741812496338.png


SANTA CLARA, Calif.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Intel Corporation (Nasdaq: INTC) today announced that its board of directors has appointed Lip-Bu Tan, an accomplished technology leader with deep semiconductor industry experience, as chief executive officer, effective March 18. He succeeds Interim Co-CEOs David Zinsner and Michelle (MJ) Johnston Holthaus. Tan will also rejoin the Intel board of directors after stepping down from the board in August 2024.

Zinsner will remain executive vice president and chief financial officer, and Johnston Holthaus will remain CEO of Intel Products. Frank D. Yeary, who took on the role of interim executive chair of the board during the search for a new CEO, will revert to being the independent chair of the board upon Tan becoming CEO.

“Lip-Bu is an exceptional leader whose technology industry expertise, deep relationships across the product and foundry ecosystems, and proven track record of creating shareholder value is exactly what Intel needs in its next CEO,” Yeary said. “Throughout his long and distinguished career, he has earned a reputation as an innovator who puts customers at the heart of everything he does, delivers differentiated solutions to win in the market and builds high-performance cultures to achieve success.

“Like many across the industry, I have worked closely with Lip-Bu in the past and have seen firsthand how his relentless attention to customers drives innovation and success,” Yeary continued. “We are delighted to have Lip-Bu as our CEO as we work to accelerate our turnaround and capitalize on the significant growth opportunities ahead.”

On his appointment, Tan said, “I am honored to join Intel as CEO. I have tremendous respect and admiration for this iconic company, and I see significant opportunities to remake our business in ways that serve our customers better and create value for our shareholders.

“Intel has a powerful and differentiated computing platform, a vast customer installed base and a robust manufacturing footprint that is getting stronger by the day as we rebuild our process technology roadmap,” Tan continued. “I am eager to join the company and build upon the work the entire Intel team has been doing to position our business for the future.”

Yeary added, “On behalf of the board, I would like to thank Dave and Michelle for their steadfast leadership as interim co-CEOs. Their discipline and focus have been a source of stability as we continue the work needed to deliver better execution, rebuild product leadership, advance our foundry strategy and begin to regain investor confidence.”

Tan is a longtime technology investor and widely respected executive with more than 20 years of semiconductor and software experiences as well as deep relationships across Intel’s ecosystem. He formerly served as CEO of Cadence Design Systems from 2009 to 2021, where he led a reinvention of the company and drove a cultural transformation centered on customer-centric innovation. During his time as CEO, Cadence more than doubled its revenue, expanded operating margins and delivered a stock price appreciation of more than 3,200%.

Tan served as a member of the Cadence board of directors for 19 years, from his appointment in 2004 through his service as executive chairman from 2021 to 2023 following his tenure as CEO.

He is also a founding managing partner of Walden Catalyst Ventures and chairman of Walden International. He has significant public company board experience, currently serving on the boards of Credo Technology Group and Schneider Electric.

Tan holds a Bachelor of Science in physics from Nanyang Technological University in Singapore, a Master of Science in nuclear engineering from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and an MBA from the University of San Francisco. In 2022, he received the Robert N. Noyce Award, the Semiconductor Industry Association’s highest honor.

Forward-Looking Statements
This press release includes forward-looking statements, including with respect to our expectations and the potential implications of Mr. Tan joining Intel, the strength of Intel’s computing footprint, installed customer base and manufacturing footprint, the progress in rebuilding Intel’s process technology roadmap, and opportunities for the business and future shareholder value. These statements involve risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied, including the risks and uncertainties described in Intel’s 2024 Form 10-K and other filings with the SEC. All information in this statement reflects management's intentions and expectations as of the date of this statement, unless an earlier date is specified. We do not undertake, and expressly disclaim any duty, to update such statements, whether as a result of new information, new developments, or otherwise, except to the extent that disclosure may be required by law.

About Intel
Intel (Nasdaq: INTC) is an industry leader, creating world-changing technology that enables global progress and enriches lives. Inspired by Moore’s Law, we continuously work to advance the design and manufacturing of semiconductors to help address our customers’ greatest challenges. By embedding intelligence in the cloud, network, edge and every kind of computing device, we unleash the potential of data to transform business and society for the better. To learn more about Intel’s innovations, go to newsroom.intel.com and intel.com.

© Intel Corporation. Intel, the Intel logo and other Intel marks are trademarks of Intel Corporation or its subsidiaries. Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others.

Contacts​

Joseph Green
Investor Relations
1-480-552-2509
joseph.e.green@intel.com
Sophie Won Metzger
Media Relations
1-408-653-0475
sophie.metzger@intel.com

 
Mr Tan will be Intel's Steve Jobs :cool:.
one thing is that Mr Tan is not a technical guy, as many folks (including me) on this forum hoped Intel will hire
 
Mr Tan will be Intel's Steve Jobs :cool:.
one thing is that Mr Tan is not a technical guy, as many folks (including me) on this forum hoped Intel will hire

I'm wondering about his strategy for Intel Foundry. I really respect his courage in taking the Intel CEO job because there are mountainous tasks ahead of him.
 
Sounds like Tan leans towards fabless.

My guess is that Lip-Bu will split the company and do another big reduction in force.

GlobalFoundries is best suited to run the Intel fabs but I doubt Intel will go beyond 18A. Trump is friends with the owners of GlobalFoundries (Abu Dhabi) so a deal can definitely be made there. TSMC might invest as a tax write-off but I do not see TSMC having anything to do with Intel manufacturing. I do not see Samsung taking over Intel manufacturing either. That would be a disaster.

Intel as an independent design company would be wildly profitable while x86 is alive, assuming they renew their partnership with TSMC.

One thing I can tell you about Lip-Bu is that he is a very focused and determined man. He did a great job with Cadence and is on the board of more than a dozen different companies so he is very well connected. He also knows the Intel board very well.

Exciting times, absolutely.
 
My guess is that Lip-Bu will split the company and do another big reduction in force.

GlobalFoundries is best suited to run the Intel fabs but I doubt Intel will go beyond 18A. Trump is friends with the owners of GlobalFoundries (Abu Dhabi) so a deal can definitely be made there. TSMC might invest as a tax write-off but I do not see TSMC having anything to do with Intel manufacturing. I do not see Samsung taking over Intel manufacturing either. That would be a disaster.

Intel as an independent design company would be wildly profitable while x86 is alive, assuming they renew their partnership with TSMC.

One thing I can tell you about Lip-Bu is that he is a very focused and determined man. He did a great job with Cadence and is on the board of more than a dozen different companies so he is very well connected. He also knows the Intel board very well.

Exciting times, absolutely.
The company is already split. The goal should be about making foundry competitive. The valuation for foundry should be 1-2x of the book value. The board is about increasing shareholder value. Hence, they asked Lip-Bu to be the CEO. If 18A is competitive, there is no reason to not extract every single cent from 18A investment. Also, now there is no need to ask Broadcom to do the cost cutting.
 
My guess is that Lip-Bu will split the company and do another big reduction in force.

GlobalFoundries is best suited to run the Intel fabs but I doubt Intel will go beyond 18A. Trump is friends with the owners of GlobalFoundries (Abu Dhabi) so a deal can definitely be made there. TSMC might invest as a tax write-off but I do not see TSMC having anything to do with Intel manufacturing. I do not see Samsung taking over Intel manufacturing either. That would be a disaster.

Intel as an independent design company would be wildly profitable while x86 is alive, assuming they renew their partnership with TSMC.

One thing I can tell you about Lip-Bu is that he is a very focused and determined man. He did a great job with Cadence and is on the board of more than a dozen different companies so he is very well connected. He also knows the Intel board very well.

Exciting times, absolutely.
LBT's statement to Intel team, looks like he is doubling down on Intel Foundry plan too
1741818017966.png


I don't think Intel Foundry will be split completely. I think Intel Foundry will be established as a subsidiary inside Intel with independent board per the current plan. But additional investors will be brought onboard per recent Intel management commentary in last earnings call. It could be TSMC having a minority stake on Intel foundry or US govt investing money or fabless customers doing prepays to reserve future capacity if their current test chips at Intel nodes are doing well (this is the best outcome for Intel in the long run).

I think we may hear more from LBT at Intel Vision event happening at the end of this month. https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/events/on-event-series/vision.html
 
Last edited:
I think I'm happy about this but still unclear what the main differences between LBT's vision and Pat's vision are. It seemed odd that LBP would quit over a "bloated workforce" right when Intel announced $10 billion in cost cuts. It seemed liek they were already on the way to streamlining the company. So maybe he sees the opportunity for more? Or maybe a bigger cultural change, which Pat might have been reluctant to do as an Intel lifer?

One thing I have heard is that while Pat was a great technologist he was not great with customers. So that could account for a difference. Perhaps also something on AI strategy.
 
Sounds like a great leader.. I guess the real question we're all grappling with is what direction did or will the Intel Board decide on..
 
I think I'm happy about this but still unclear what the main differences between LBT's vision and Pat's vision are. It seemed odd that LBP would quit over a "bloated workforce" right when Intel announced $10 billion in cost cuts. It seemed liek they were already on the way to streamlining the company. So maybe he sees the opportunity for more? Or maybe a bigger cultural change, which Pat might have been reluctant to do as an Intel lifer?

One thing I have heard is that while Pat was a great technologist he was not great with customers. So that could account for a difference. Perhaps also something on AI strategy.
The book extract summarises my complaint about Pat. In a highly competitive industry, a leader of a public traded company should not mix ideology with management. In businesses, it is always about making money and how to make more money in the purest sense.

 
Funny Lip-Bu resigned due to a strong disagreement with the board and now that Board out of desperation or lack of no other viable candidate with credibility and a vision was available so they went back to the guy they didn’t agree with? Very very strange or desperate situation.

One could argue if Lip-Bu was always the candidate that could, would and should have happened in January. My read he wasn’t the first choice, or that all the candidates that was of interest declined, not viable, didn’t like the strategy. Faster than the last CEO selection and really how Intel got Pat he was the last man of credibility and willingness to do it, REGARDLESS OF THE VISION.

I smell a big layoff on both the Foundry and Product side. Just add up TSMC RD and fab 18 people and add Nvidia and you are at what 60-70K employees, another 30K layofff is coming at a minimum
 
The book extract summarises my complaint about Pat. In a highly competitive industry, a leader of a public traded company should not mix ideology with management. In businesses, it is always about making money and how to make more money in the purest sense.

What book is this from?

While I might agree, Pat did lay off something like 15,000 people last year. Also, it's kind of hard to fire half the company when you are also trying to get CHIPS Act money from the government, which Intel was still doing at the time.
 
What book is this from?

While I might agree, Pat did lay off something like 15,000 people last year. Also, it's kind of hard to fire half the company when you are also trying to get CHIPS Act money from the government, which Intel was still doing at the time.
He admitted to delaying such a decision. However, even with that decision, I don’t think it was good enough, as the terms were too generous. The program should have been more selective and targeted toward bloated middle management, consultants, etc.

I have also mentioned multiple times here that many of his decisions contributed to significant losses. When PG launched IFS, he hired thousands of people, but there was no work for them. One of the hires was a former manager from TSM. In an interview, he mentioned that probably around 100 people would have been enough. A similar issue occurred when PG over-indexed on PCs during the pandemic, which later led to write-offs. You can see the pattern here.

The book is in Chinese. If you can read Chinese, I think it’s worth reading. It was written in the context of the COVID pandemic. During that time, many companies in China went bankrupt
 
Back
Top