Array
(
    [content] => 
    [params] => Array
        (
            [0] => /forum/threads/goodbye-intel-%E2%80%93-new-ceo-lip-bu-tan-will-lay-off-half-the-workforce-to-save-the-company-from-possible-bankruptcy.22350/
        )

    [addOns] => Array
        (
            [DL6/MLTP] => 13
            [Hampel/TimeZoneDebug] => 1000070
            [SV/ChangePostDate] => 2010200
            [SemiWiki/Newsletter] => 1000010
            [SemiWiki/WPMenu] => 1000010
            [SemiWiki/XPressExtend] => 1000010
            [ThemeHouse/XLink] => 1000970
            [ThemeHouse/XPress] => 1010570
            [XF] => 2021770
            [XFI] => 1050270
        )

    [wordpress] => /var/www/html
)

Goodbye Intel – new CEO Lip Bu Tan will lay off half the workforce to save the company from possible bankruptcy

Daniel Nenni

Admin
Staff member
Goodbye Intel - new CEO Lip Bu Tan will lay off half the workforce to save the company from possible bankruptcy

Goodbye Intel - new CEO Lip Bu Tan will lay off half the workforce to save the company from possible bankruptcy


Lip-Bu Tan’s career wasn’t always destined for the semiconductor industry—in fact, it took a major nuclear scare to push him in a different direction. A brilliant student from the start, Tan earned a physics degree from Nanyang University in Singapore at just 19 years old. He then moved to MIT to pursue a master’s in nuclear engineering, seemingly set on a future in the field.

But then came 1979 and the Three Mile Island nuclear accident, which shook public confidence in nuclear energy. As concerns over safety skyrocketed, job opportunities in the field plummeted. With the nuclear sector looking uncertain, Tan decided to change gears entirely.

A sharp pivot to business and tech​

Instead of waiting for the nuclear industry to recover, Tan went back to school, this time at the University of San Francisco, where he earned a master’s degree in business administration. That decision paid off big time. He went on to found Walden International, a venture capital firm that zeroed in on the semiconductor and alternative energy sectors—both of which turned out to be massive growth industries.

Lip-Bu Tan has an eye for investments that pay off big—especially in the semiconductor industry. One of his standout moves was backing Annapurna Labs, a company that later got scooped up by Amazon. That acquisition turned Annapurna into a key player in the tech giant’s chip development, powering much of its infrastructure. Another win? He also put money into Nuvia, which went on to be snapped up by Qualcomm in 2021.

From investor to power player in the industry​

Tan wasn’t just writing checks—he was getting directly involved. In 2004, he joined the board of directors at Cadence Design Systems, one of the biggest names in chip design software. Just a few years later, in 2008, he stepped up as co-CEO, before taking full leadership in 2009. Under his watch, Cadence’s stock skyrocketed by 3,200%, cementing its role as a critical partner for companies like Apple.

His success at Cadence opened even more doors. Over the years, Tan has become a fixture in boardrooms across multiple industries. He’s held seats at Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Schneider Electric, and, perhaps most intriguingly, SoftBank—one of the most influential investment firms in tech.

One of the biggest signs of what’s ahead for Intel isn’t just who Tan is, but who he disagreed with. While his ties to SoftBank are notable, his past role at Intel’s board of directors from 2022 to 2024 is even more telling. He stepped down in August 2024, and it wasn’t just a quiet exit—he left due to clear disagreements with then-CEO Pat Gelsinger.

A vision at odds with Intel’s old ways​

According to Reuters, Tan’s concerns about Intel’s direction weren’t minor. He wasn’t thrilled with the company’s growing workforce, saw too much red tape slowing things down, and believed Intel had become too cautious when it needed to take bigger risks. He also had serious doubts about the company’s approach to artificial intelligence and was frustrated that he couldn’t push through an initiative to secure third-party manufacturing contracts—a move that could have positioned Intel as a powerhouse in the semiconductor industry.

At 65 years old, Tan isn’t stepping into the CEO role to play it safe. Analysts like Patrick Moorhead predict he’ll make aggressive cost-cutting moves, and in the corporate world, that almost always spells layoffs.

One of the biggest questions surrounding Tan’s leadership is whether he’ll push for a major shake-up—specifically, splitting Intel’s foundry unit from its processor design division. This is exactly what AMD did back in 2009, a move that ultimately worked in its favor. Many industry experts have been urging Intel to follow suit, arguing that it could help the company operate more efficiently.

If there’s one thing working in Tan’s favor, it’s his reputation. He’s not an outsider trying to find his footing—he already knows the players inside and outside of Intel. The company’s potential clients are familiar with him too, especially those who worked with him during his time on Intel’s board or partnered with Cadence while he was CEO.

 
"One of the biggest questions surrounding Tan’s leadership is whether he’ll push for a major shake-up—specifically, splitting Intel’s foundry unit from its processor design division. This is exactly what AMD did back in 2009, a move that ultimately worked in its favor. Many industry experts have been urging Intel to follow suit, arguing that it could help the company operate more efficiently."

Intel Foundries is a separate business, it has been already been split, right? Or do they mean outright sell it? Then why not just say sell it? That is what AMD did, they did not just split it, they sold it off. Intel Design has a CEO that reports into Lip-Bu. It seems like Intel Design and Manufacturing are two different companies already. I seriously doubt Lip-Bu will sell IFS, nor will he lay-off 50k+ people, that is ridiculous.

"new CEO Lip Bu Tan will lay off half the workforce to save the company from possible bankruptcy"

:ROFLMAO:
Made us click :ROFLMAO:
 
"One of the biggest questions surrounding Tan’s leadership is whether he’ll push for a major shake-up—specifically, splitting Intel’s foundry unit from its processor design division. This is exactly what AMD did back in 2009, a move that ultimately worked in its favor. Many industry experts have been urging Intel to follow suit, arguing that it could help the company operate more efficiently."

Intel Foundries is a separate business, it has been already been split, right? Or do they mean outright sell it? Then why not just say sell it? That is what AMD did, they did not just split it, they sold it off. Intel Design has a CEO that reports into Lip-Bu. It seems like Intel Design and Manufacturing are two different companies already. I seriously doubt Lip-Bu will sell IFS, nor will he lay-off 50k+ people, that is ridiculous.

"new CEO Lip Bu Tan will lay off half the workforce to save the company from possible bankruptcy"

:ROFLMAO:
Made us click :ROFLMAO:

The Intel Design/Product Division and Intel Foundry are just two divisions under a single corporation, Intel, with the stock symbol INTC. While each division has its own Profit and Loss accounting calculations, these are ultimately consolidated into a single SEC financial filing.

If Intel leadership chooses, they can allocate more expenses to the Intel Foundry Division to make the Intel Design/Product Division appear more profitable. Alternatively, they can shift more expenses to the Intel Product Division from Intel Foundry to create the impression that Intel Foundry is improving.

Essentially, it's like moving money between the left pocket and the right pocket of the same pair of pants.
 
Ridiculous titles continue:

Intel's New CEO Just Dropped a Bombshell -- Is This the Comeback Investors Have Been Waiting For?
Intel (NASDAQ:INTC) just kicked off a major shake-up under new CEO Lip-Bu Tan, and he's wasting no time making big moves. Tan is set to slash middle management, overhaul the company's AI strategy, and double down on Intel's foundry businessa division that has struggled to keep up with Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing (NYSE:TSM). With Intel posting a $19 billion loss in 2024, its worst since 1986, Tan is on a mission to revive the company's competitive edge. His strategy? A leaner, faster, and more aggressive Intel, capable of not just designing top-tier chips but also manufacturing them for giants like Microsoft and Amazon.

 
The Intel Design/Product Division and Intel Foundry are just two divisions under a single corporation, Intel, with the stock symbol INTC. While each division has its own Profit and Loss accounting calculations, these are ultimately consolidated into a single SEC financial filing.

If Intel leadership chooses, they can allocate more expenses to the Intel Foundry Division to make the Intel Design/Product Division appear more profitable. Alternatively, they can shift more expenses to the Intel Product Division from Intel Foundry to create the impression that Intel Foundry is improving.

Essentially, it's like moving money from the left pocket to the right pocket of the same pair of pants.

Is it the same with Altera? Would that be the back pocket?
 
Is it the same with Altera? Would that be the back pocket?

Or one of those several hidden pockets in the same Intel pants.

Do you remember the infamous Intel "Contra Revenue" scheme? I have always suspected that Intel lost more than the $1–2 billion reported. For example, at that time, McAfee (wholly owned by Intel then) offered a 100% manufacturer rebate for its antivirus software to customers who purchased it along with Acer, Asus, or HP tablets (built with Intel mobile chips, which were also entitled to a 100% manufacturer rebate).

McAfee was one of those pockets to beautify Intel's books.
 
Or one of those several hidden pockets in the same Intel pants.

Do you remember the infamous Intel "Contra Revenue" scheme? I have always suspected that Intel lost more than the $1–2 billion reported. For example, at that time, McAfee (wholly owned by Intel then) offered a 100% manufacturer rebate for its antivirus software to customers who purchased it along with Acer, Asus, or HP tablets (built with Intel mobile chips, which were also entitled to a 100% manufacturer rebate).

McAfee was one of those pockets to beautify Intel's books.

Contra Revenue was Intel CFO Stacy Smith. I thought it was a very shady thing to do. Lost billions trying to get into mobile. :ROFLMAO: Paul Otellini started that one and BK rode it out. Worst two Intel CEOs in my opinion.
 
Back
Top