Array
(
    [content] => 
    [params] => Array
        (
            [0] => /forum/threads/intel-ceo-lip-bu-tan%E2%80%99s-letter-%E2%80%93-2024-annual-report-to-security-holders.22424/
        )

    [addOns] => Array
        (
            [DL6/MLTP] => 13
            [Hampel/TimeZoneDebug] => 1000070
            [SV/ChangePostDate] => 2010200
            [SemiWiki/Newsletter] => 1000010
            [SemiWiki/WPMenu] => 1000010
            [SemiWiki/XPressExtend] => 1000010
            [ThemeHouse/XLink] => 1000970
            [ThemeHouse/XPress] => 1010570
            [XF] => 2021770
            [XFI] => 1050270
        )

    [wordpress] => /var/www/html
)

Intel CEO Lip-Bu Tan’s Letter – 2024 Annual Report to Security Holders

XYang2023

Well-known member
Letter from Intel CEO

Dear Stockholder,

When I stepped into my role as CEO of Intel earlier this month, I did so with a pragmatic focus on the business and a profound belief in our company. While there are clear challenges that we need to overcome, there are also significant opportunities to accelerate our turnaround and improve our performance.

Achieving the results I know Intel is capable of starts by refocusing on our customers. This has been priority number one since my first day on the job. I am listening carefully to their feedback so that we continue driving the changes needed to delight our customers and strengthen our competitive position.

Plain and simple, the time for talk is over. We must turn our words into action and deliver on our commitments. I have been pleased to see the leadership team has already started driving the culture change needed to make this happen. As CEO, I will continue to drive this transformation so that we move faster, work smarter and make it easier for customers to win with Intel. Most importantly, I will empower our people to do what they do best -- push the limits of technology and innovate to achieve new breakthroughs.

Actions to Accelerate Progress

Intel’s future success requires an honest assessment of past performance. As I look back on the company’s 2024 results, there is no sugarcoating the fact that we fell short of your expectations. There are many reasons for this, but there are no excuses. I am focused on solutions that will enhance the long-term performance of the company and deliver for you, our shareholders.

The work our team has been doing to deliver on the $10 billion cost action plan we announced last year plays an important role. It has required decisive actions, including a 15% reduction in the size of our workforce last year as we right-size the business for the future. We will remain focused on executing this plan to reduce our operating expenses and capital expenditures, simplify our portfolio, and eliminate organizational complexity -- all while maintaining critical investments in future growth.

Our most recent quarterly results showed signs of progress. In Q4 of last year, we delivered revenue, gross margin, and EPS above our guidance. While our performance is nowhere near where I believe it ultimately can and must be, this gives us a lot to build on in 2025 as we continue to drive a disciplined focus on execution and value creation.

A Stronger Intel Products Business

As someone who has followed Intel for a long time, I have seen firsthand that the company has always performed at its best when it delivers amazing products that delight customers. This is the mindset that drives me as a leader. And as I've been meeting with our teams, I've been inspired by the opportunities I see to reinvigorate the Intel Products portfolio.

Roughly 7 in 10 PCs in the world are powered by Intel. We are expanding our leadership position in key segments like AI PCs with our Core Ultra systems.

But it’s not just hardware that makes me optimistic about our client business. It's also the work we are doing with more than 200 independent software vendors across more than 400 features to optimize their software on Intel silicon. This is strengthening our position as the CPU of choice in a valuable growth market. We will further enhance our position in the second half of this year with the launch of Panther Lake, our lead product on Intel 18A, followed by Nova Lake in 2026.

Nearly three-quarters of the world’s primary data center workloads also run on Intel silicon. That said, past strength is not a predictor of future success, and it's clear we need to up our game. It is good to see the new Xeon 6 portfolio starting to close gaps with competition and reassert Intel’s leadership in this important market. We plan to build on this with Clearwater Forest, our first Intel 18A server product, launching in the first half of 2026.

When it comes to the Al hyperscale data center, I see a clear customer need for lower cost, more efficient compute. Intel's leading position as the host CPU for Al servers is a strong foundation that we can build upon, particularly as the market evolves toward on-prem inferencing and edge Al applications. But there's no question we need to strengthen our position in the cloud-based Al data center market by developing competitive rack-scale system solutions, which will be a key priority for me and the team.

A Stronger Intel Foundry

To enable great products, I am equally focused on creating great process technology, which is core to our strategy for building a world-class foundry.

One of the first things I did when I joined the company was to better understand the progress of Intel 18A. It is healthy and will enhance our competitiveness in the market. In addition to Panther Lake, we are in our final design phase with early Intel 18A external customer projects and expect to complete our first release to fab manufacturing in the middle of this year. We also continue to advance our roadmap of future nodes as we rebuild process leadership.

We're doing this while optimizing our capital to align spending with market demand and put Intel Foundry on the path to profitability.

Intel has a vitally important role to play in meeting the growing need for advanced semiconductor production, both in the U.S. and abroad. We are excited to begin high-volume production on Intel 18A at our newest fab in Arizona later this year and look forward to continued work with the U.S. Administration to strengthen the country’s technology and manufacturing leadership. While some companies are returning to the U.S. or investing here for the first time, Intel never left -- and we continue to expand our operations.

A New Intel

I recognize much work is needed to deliver the kind of results you expect with your investment. The entire leadership team and I are committed to improving our performance and positioning the business for future success. We will do so by putting customers at the center of everything we do -- and we are moving ahead with confidence because we have an incredible team of employees that’s up to the challenge.

My pledge to you is that we will continue acting with urgency to strengthen Intel’s competitive position and cultivate a culture of customer-centricity needed to win in our markets. In the process, I’m confident we will deliver a greater return for you, our shareholders.

I am humbled and honored to be Intel’s CEO and appreciate the trust the Board has placed in me to lead our company. Thank you for your investment in Intel.

Sincerely,

Lip-Bu Tan

 
That's the part that caught my eye as well.
I think what Lip-Bu could do:
1. Assigning a right person to lead the this effort
2. Allocating more resources into the project
3. Accelerate the time-to-market schedule
4. Try to increase the competitiveness of the Jaguar Shores product line vs. Nvidia's products at that time
 
I think what Lip-Bu could do:
1. Assigning a right person to lead the this effort
2. Allocating more resources into the project
3. Accelerate the time-to-market schedule
4. Try to increase the competitiveness of the Jaguar Shores product line vs. Nvidia's products at that time

After thinking about this for a bit I wonder if Lip-Bu is playing his cards close to his chest here. Or maybe he is speaking directly to investors. Intel is a leader, not a follower. Following TSMC and Nvidia is an overwhelming challenge, and now Intel will be following in rack-scale systems? That seems like low hanging fruit. What is the long game here? Lip-Bu knows full well that only the paranoid survive. He brought that to Cadence and he will bring it back to Intel, my opinion.
 
One common point I noticed about all the comments I read about lip bu Tan is he is extremely well connected in the semiconductor industry. Hopefully that will be a great help to Intel.
 
After thinking about this for a bit I wonder if Lip-Bu is playing his cards close to his chest here. Or maybe he is speaking directly to investors. Intel is a leader, not a follower. Following TSMC and Nvidia is an overwhelming challenge, and now Intel will be following in rack-scale systems? That seems like low hanging fruit. What is the long game here? Lip-Bu knows full well that only the paranoid survive. He brought that to Cadence and he will bring it back to Intel, my opinion.
Several analysts mentioned Intel does not have concrete products to address the data centre AI market. They have Gaudi though. Anyways, addressing this point should allow Intel command for a higher multiple. The market is very large and there are only handful of companies that can address this market.

For foundry, I think Intel should try to make it break even as soon as possible. Doing so will remove the drag on Intel's valuation.

Hence, addressing the two areas are not contradictory.
 
Several analysts mentioned Intel does not have concrete products to address the data centre AI market. They have Gaudi though. Anyways, addressing this point should allow Intel command for a higher multiple. The market is very large and there are only handful of companies that can address this market.

For foundry, I think Intel should try to make it break even as soon as possible. Doing so will remove the drag on Intel's valuation.

Hence, addressing the two areas are not contradictory.
Foundry breakeven depends on volume the more volume on EUV nodes the sooner they break even
 
Is one of the problems with the AI server market that Intel basically expects to supply silicon to Supermicro or Dell or HP or whoever? Once you cross the rubicon into making the servers themselves, competing with your core customer base, it is a big change in competitive strategy. I'm not sure how Nvidia can do it either, although with Nvidia, they've always sold a certain number of graphics cards themselves, basically as a reference design. Until recently with these AI servers.
 
Following TSMC and Nvidia is an overwhelming challenge, and now Intel will be following in rack-scale systems?
I trust Lip Bu to be extremely customer-focused as well as strategic. If customers want to consume their AI data center chips in the form of tuned racks, and even larger systems, Intel needs to deliver that. Maybe he sees a way to leverage Intel's ostensible lead in photonics and photonic switching as well.
Is one of the problems with the AI server market that Intel basically expects to supply silicon to Supermicro or Dell or HP or whoever?
I think this has been one of Intel's problems - they have been relying on sell-through to enterprises, while another big chunk of their business goes through the hyperscalers who do their own data center magic. But the enterprise AI data center product has to be more than just a integration, it has be a rack and even data-center-wide tuned system, where everything is engineered together - GPU/CPUs, rack-level interconnect, rack to rack interconnect, and data-center wide orchestration software. HPE was looking to do something like this, but they couldn't complete the Juniper deal. AMD bought ZT to go integrated.
 
I can't shake the feeling that Intel will create a great rack scale AI system and bring it to market just in time for the bubble to really pop. Please help ease my fears on this.

On scale: Intel has high performance products but usually also higher powered products than seen in phones etc. So from a production line learning standpoint they ship much less units so learning suffers. Can Intel ever hope to catch up to TSMC on the learning curve?
 
I can't shake the feeling that Intel will create a great rack scale AI system and bring it to market just in time for the bubble to really pop. Please help ease my fears on this.

On scale: Intel has high performance products but usually also higher powered products than seen in phones etc. So from a production line learning standpoint they ship much less units so learning suffers. Can Intel ever hope to catch up to TSMC on the learning curve?
I think the market is looking for cost-effective alternatives. Generative AI is useful in certain areas—though not for tasks like cartoon generation—but for roles such as medical general practitioners, legal assistance, and more. However, I have reservations about its widespread application.

Regarding robotics, I don’t believe it will become widespread, not due to technological limitations but because of regulatory challenges. For example, drones have been around for decades, yet we still haven't widely adopted them for delivery services. The same logic applies to humanoid robots—it doesn't make sense to place them in households and require residents to wear steel-toe boots for safety.

Therefore, I believe generative AI will primarily remain a software-driven field, and hopefully, the current hype around it will eventually subside.

 
AMD bought ZT to go integrated.
Quick update - AMD / ZT deal just closed.

AMD Closes $4.9 Billion ZT Systems Deal, Targeting Its Piece of the ‘AI Factory’
Chip giant CEO Lisa Su says AI is still in its ‘very early stages’ as the company revs up competition with Nvidia


As AI drives up the complexity of hardware integration for customers, AMD needs to provide more than just chips and software, said Chief Executive Lisa Su. “You really have to put the entire system together,” she said.

Over the past several years, both Nvidia and AMD have taken greater interest in data-center servers, the infrastructure that goes into the massive server farms that power cloud-computing platforms and AI applications. Servers are the overall systems that house and connect chips and accelerators like graphics processing units,

Nvidia has made a concerted effort to broaden its focus from silicon by taking on a new role as data-center designer—or an “AI factory,” a strategy most associated with Chief Executive Jensen Huang. That means offering a sort of one-stop shop for all the key elements in data centers, including software, design services and networking technology.

With ZT, AMD is aiming to get a piece of the AI factory, too. Where AMD stands out among competitors like Nvidia is by offering a so-called open or open-source ecosystem, rather than a proprietary system with all-inclusive pieces, Su said.
 
Back
Top