Array
(
    [content] => 
    [params] => Array
        (
            [0] => /forum/threads/panther-lake-design-rules-revealed-no-hd-cells.24596/
        )

    [addOns] => Array
        (
            [DL6/MLTP] => 13
            [Hampel/TimeZoneDebug] => 1000070
            [SV/ChangePostDate] => 2010200
            [SemiWiki/Newsletter] => 1000010
            [SemiWiki/WPMenu] => 1000010
            [SemiWiki/XPressExtend] => 1000010
            [ThemeHouse/XLink] => 1000970
            [ThemeHouse/XPress] => 1010570
            [XF] => 2030970
            [XFI] => 1060170
        )

    [wordpress] => /var/www/html
)

Panther Lake design rules revealed, no HD cells

I would like to point out few things
  • - Intel has traditionally used HP Cells in their Products. Intel 10nm -> ADL,RPL,TGL Intel 4/3 -> MTL/ARL.​
  • - The decision to use HP/HD is on design not on foundry for what characteristics they want.​
  • As for whether Intel can do 32nm direct print or not remains to be seen cause they didn't put it in any other product yet.​
  • The article seems poorly written imo.​
 
Given the power consumption and performance of PTL, I say they made a good design choice.

For customers, doesn't that mean they have a potentially chaper alternative (since it is less dense) for the same power/performance level?
 
1771683089169.png
 
Back
Top