Array
(
[content] =>
[params] => Array
(
[0] => /forum/whats-new/latest-activity?before_id=92397
)
[addOns] => Array
(
[DL6/MLTP] => 13
[Hampel/TimeZoneDebug] => 1000070
[SV/ChangePostDate] => 2010200
[SemiWiki/Newsletter] => 1000010
[SemiWiki/WPMenu] => 1000010
[SemiWiki/XPressExtend] => 1000010
[ThemeHouse/XLink] => 1000970
[ThemeHouse/XPress] => 1010570
[XF] => 2021770
[XFI] => 1050270
)
[wordpress] => /var/www/html
)
You are currently viewing SemiWiki as a guest which gives you limited access to the site. To view blog comments and experience other SemiWiki features you must be a registered member. Registration is fast, simple, and absolutely free so please,
join our community today !
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser .
And it doesn’t require EUV, backside power, or gate-all-around, any of those gimmicks.
Monday at 11:59 AM
No thank you, I do not need your bailout. My Lego empire is thriving on its own. It is very capital extensive but the ROI is well worth it.
Monday at 11:54 AM
IMO
Stock buy backs dont have any effect on the company... it does prevent stock dilution. Intel spend TOO much on capex and R&D. Who...
Monday at 11:51 AM
M
IMO
Stock buy backs dont have any effect on the company... it does prevent stock dilution. Intel spend TOO much on capex and R&D. Who...
Monday at 11:49 AM
One way or another, every government in the world (including the US and Taiwan) supports its own industries. Otherwise, it isn’t really...
Monday at 11:42 AM
X
No thank you, I do not need your bailout. My Lego empire is thriving on its own. It is very capital extensive but the ROI is well worth it.
Monday at 11:40 AM
M
Now we need to get back to basic questions:
1) Will people commit to buy foundry wafers from Intel someday
2) How much will intel...
Monday at 11:34 AM
M
I there are two different issues.
1) The Intel investment looks like a win win given what intel needs and the fact that they are not...
Monday at 11:28 AM
S
I knew you were a too highly valued person for POTUS to deal with !!
Monday at 10:43 AM
S
No thank you, I do not need your bailout. My Lego empire is thriving on its own. It is very capital extensive but the ROI is well worth it.
Monday at 10:43 AM
B
If the goal is competition for TSMC, the fastest way to do that would be to let China have EUV.
Monday at 10:39 AM
I knew you were a too highly valued person for POTUS to deal with !!
Monday at 10:31 AM
No thank you, I do not need your bailout. My Lego empire is thriving on its own. It is very capital extensive but the ROI is well worth it.
Monday at 10:30 AM
That's correct, he got a gun to his head that he was going to get fired, unless he came to KISS the KING's RING.
He did and the rest is...
Monday at 10:29 AM
S
If the goal is competition for TSMC, the fastest way to do that would be to let China have EUV.
Monday at 10:27 AM
hist78 replied to the thread TSMC considers returning US subsidies over government equity stake.And it doesn’t require EUV, backside power, or gate-all-around, any of those gimmicks.
Like.
No thank you, I do not need your bailout. My Lego empire is thriving on its own. It is very capital extensive but the ROI is well worth it.
IMO Stock buy backs dont have any effect on the company... it does prevent stock dilution. Intel spend TOO much on capex and R&D. Who...
user nl replied to the thread TSMC considers returning US subsidies over government equity stake.I knew you were a too highly valued person for POTUS to deal with !!