Array
(
    [content] => 
    [params] => Array
        (
            [0] => /forum/threads/why-tsmc-will-keep-its-roots-in-taiwan-even-as-it-goes-global.18524/
        )

    [addOns] => Array
        (
            [DL6/MLTP] => 13
            [Hampel/TimeZoneDebug] => 1000070
            [SV/ChangePostDate] => 2010200
            [SemiWiki/Newsletter] => 1000010
            [SemiWiki/WPMenu] => 1000010
            [SemiWiki/XPressExtend] => 1000010
            [ThemeHouse/XLink] => 1000970
            [ThemeHouse/XPress] => 1010570
            [XF] => 2021770
            [XFI] => 1050270
        )

    [wordpress] => /var/www/html
)

Why TSMC Will Keep Its Roots in Taiwan, Even as It Goes Global

Daniel Nenni

Admin
Staff member
Mark Liu 2023.jpg


In an interview, the chip maker’s chairman, Mark Liu, explained why TSMC’s top tech would stay in Taiwan, despite growing threats from China and worries from the United States.

TSMC, which is manufacturing the world’s most advanced microchips, conducts business on the island of Taiwan, dead center in one of the most geopolitically volatile places on the planet. That makes people in Washington very nervous. TSMC dominates the semiconductor industry; it’s a company that the United States can’t do without, 80 miles off the coast of China. The U.S. government has appropriated tens of billions of dollars to strengthen America’s own semiconductor sector and help fund TSMC’s nascent operations in the U.S., far from China, which has never renounced the use of force to absorb Taiwan.

But TSMC has invested billions of its own over nearly four decades growing deep roots in Taiwan. There, it employs a small army of engineers, R&D scientists, technicians and production workers in the exquisitely complex task of producing chips. It would be exceedingly difficult to replicate what TSMC has built in Taiwan, said Mark Liu, chairman of TSMC. Developing and producing the company’s most cutting-edge chips at a rapid pace requires a huge effort, he said, as many as 3,000 research scientists for one generation of the technology.

“We cannot put it anyplace else,” he said.

TSMC has embarked on a global expansion, with two factories under construction in the United States and one in Japan, as well as a possible facility in Germany. It’s part of the company’s strategy to address the calls by U.S. officials to reduce America’s reliance on chips made in Taiwan. That makes the 68-year-old Mr. Liu, who holds a doctoral degree in electronic engineering and computer science, as much a diplomat as a scientist and an executive. He joined TSMC 30 years ago after stints at Intel and Bell Labs, rose through the ranks and today runs the $500 billion company with its CEO and vice chairman, C.C. Wei.

In late June, when he spoke to The New York Times at TSMC’s offices in the northern Taiwan city of Hsinchu, he had just returned from a trip to the United States, which he said he visits roughly every three months.

“We have a pretty good relationship across Congress, the Commerce Department, the White House. I think they know us,” he said.

“China will not invade Taiwan because of semiconductors. China will not NOT invade Taiwan because of semiconductors,” he said. “It is really up to the U.S. and China: How do they maintain the status quo, which both sides want?”

And doubts loom over whether American companies will be willing to pay the likely premium required for chips made in Arizona, where TSMC’s construction costs alone could be at least four times higher than they are in Taiwan. Mr. Liu said he had told the U.S. government that it needed to offer American companies incentives, beyond the $52 billion in subsidies in the CHIPS Act, to buy American-made chips.

“Otherwise, it will be limited,” he said. “It will come to limits pretty quickly. So that is on the table. But I don’t think we have a solution yet.”

 
“China will not invade Taiwan because of semiconductors. China will not NOT invade Taiwan because of semiconductors,” he said. “It is really up to the U.S. and China: How do they maintain the status quo, which both sides want?”

True, China will only invade militarily if future Taiwan leaders calling for independence from China, or no hope to unite peacefully.
 
I think TSMC management, including Morris Chang, should just be quiet. Even the least impressive members of the US Congress are fully aware that China could not possibly think that they would invade Taiwan to capture advanced semiconductor manufacturing. If there is an invasion, it will be to solidify Xi Jinping's legacy as a Chinese leader on par with Mao Zedong. As for both sides wanting to maintain the status quo, that is ridiculous. The Chinese government is obviously not satisfied with the status quo. They are restricted from formally buying leading edge semiconductors. Of course, I see TSMC's dilemma. The company is afraid to have an aggressive posture towards China, and the western countries who want TSMC to build on their soil are reluctant to confront TSMC's claims and negotiate to get their investment at the same time. After all of this posturing about costs and lack of trained people, TSMC would look heroic if they succeed, which I'm sure strokes their corporate ego.

Isn't a deep competitive advantage grand? (While it lasts...)

The biggest strategic question in my mind is... what will the US and its allies do if Taiwan strikes a deal with China and decides to unify peacefully? I know this is an unpopular and currently unlikely position in Taiwan, but positions change. When I've thought about this, it would allow Xi to be China's greatest legacy hero, TSMC would be intact, and I can't think of an acceptable US/Western country response other than capitulation. Just cutting the newly Chinese TSMC off from western semiconductor equipment would harm the equipment companies almost as much as it would a unified China and TSMC, which would harm the resulting western countries' emergency semiconductor arms race. If all players were rational this scenario would be unthinkable, but autocrats chasing legacy are not usually rational. China would change the world order without firing a shot, and deeply harm its adversaries in numerous ways without firing a shot too. China could grant Taiwan any deal they demand short of independence and still come out far ahead. I think that's the scary part.
 
Last edited:
what will the US and its allies do if Taiwan strikes a deal with China and decides to unify peacefully? I know this is an unpopular and currently unlikely position in Taiwan, but positions change.
It can happen. Let's remember that Taiwan also has president election. It's possible for Taiwanese who want that option to vote for any leader that embrace unification. What China can do is to put more navy/air force around the island to create that atmosphere which is something we are seeing now.

 
I think TSMC management, including Morris Chang, should just be quiet. Even the least impressive members of the US Congress are fully aware that China could not possibly think that they would invade Taiwan to capture advanced semiconductor manufacturing. If there is an invasion, it will be to solidify Xi Jinping's legacy as a Chinese leader on par with Mao Zedong. As for both sides wanting to maintain the status quo, that is ridiculous. The Chinese government is obviously not satisfied with the status quo. They are restricted from formally buying leading edge semiconductors. Of course, I see TSMC's dilemma. The company is afraid to have an aggressive posture towards China, and the western countries who want TSMC to build on their soil are reluctant to confront TSMC's claims and negotiate to get their investment at the same time. After all of this posturing about costs and lack of trained people, TSMC would look heroic if they succeed, which I'm sure strokes their corporate ego.

Isn't a deep competitive advantage grand? (While it lasts...)

The biggest strategic question in my mind is... what will the US and its allies do if Taiwan strikes a deal with China and decides to unify peacefully? I know this is an unpopular and currently unlikely position in Taiwan, but positions change. When I've thought about this, it would allow Xi to be China's greatest legacy hero, TSMC would be intact, and I can't think of an acceptable US/Western country response other than capitulation. Just cutting the newly Chinese TSMC off from western semiconductor equipment would harm the equipment companies almost as much as it would a unified China and TSMC, which would harm the resulting western countries' emergency semiconductor arms race. If all players were rational this scenario would be unthinkable, but autocrats chasing legacy are not usually rational. China would change the world order without firing a shot, and deeply harm its adversaries in numerous ways without firing a shot too. China could grant Taiwan any deal they demand short of independence and still come out far ahead. I think that's the scary part.


A peaceful unification between two sides of Taiwan Straits is possible only if Chinese Communist Party is kicked out from the power. It will happen eventually but it may take time.

"The biggest strategic question in my mind is... what will the US and its allies do if Taiwan strikes a deal with China and decides to unify peacefully? I know this is an unpopular and currently unlikely position in Taiwan, but positions change. When I've thought about this, it would allow Xi to be China's greatest legacy hero, TSMC would be intact, and I can't think of an acceptable US/Western country response other than capitulation. Just cutting the newly Chinese TSMC off from western semiconductor equipment would harm the equipment companies almost as much as it would a unified China and TSMC, which would harm the resulting western countries' emergency semiconductor arms race. If all players were rational this scenario would be unthinkable, but autocrats chasing legacy are not usually rational. China would change the world order without firing a shot, and deeply harm its adversaries in numerous ways without firing a shot too. China could grant Taiwan any deal they demand short of independence and still come out far ahead. I think that's the scary part."
 
Yeah, if China were to make a sweet enough deal to Taiwan, maybe positions could change - but it's hard to imagine at the moment. Right now there is too much animosity, and no real dialogue on the subject.
 
Yeah, if China were to make a sweet enough deal to Taiwan, maybe positions could change - but it's hard to imagine at the moment. Right now there is too much animosity, and no real dialogue on the subject.

Mainland China is controlled by the Chinese Communist Party and by one person, Chairman Xi, while Taiwan, Republic of China, is a democratic country exists for 112 years.

Most people in Taiwan is smart enough to know that believing a dictator is wasting of time.
 
Yeah, if China were to make a sweet enough deal to Taiwan, maybe positions could change - but it's hard to imagine at the moment. Right now there is too much animosity, and no real dialogue on the subject.

Did things go as planned/promised with Hong Kong? I was there during some protests/riots but I have not been back since the pandemic.
 
Did things go as planned/promised with Hong Kong? I was there during some protests/riots but I have not been back since the pandemic.
"One country, two systems" is still legally alive, but it would be difficult to call it a true success from the papers I've read. But if the alternative is a costly invasion and betting on the US and Japan for defense, I can see where some Taiwan officials five years from now might be tempted by unification negotiations.
 
View attachment 1350

In an interview, the chip maker’s chairman, Mark Liu, explained why TSMC’s top tech would stay in Taiwan, despite growing threats from China and worries from the United States.

TSMC, which is manufacturing the world’s most advanced microchips, conducts business on the island of Taiwan, dead center in one of the most geopolitically volatile places on the planet. That makes people in Washington very nervous. TSMC dominates the semiconductor industry; it’s a company that the United States can’t do without, 80 miles off the coast of China. The U.S. government has appropriated tens of billions of dollars to strengthen America’s own semiconductor sector and help fund TSMC’s nascent operations in the U.S., far from China, which has never renounced the use of force to absorb Taiwan.

But TSMC has invested billions of its own over nearly four decades growing deep roots in Taiwan. There, it employs a small army of engineers, R&D scientists, technicians and production workers in the exquisitely complex task of producing chips. It would be exceedingly difficult to replicate what TSMC has built in Taiwan, said Mark Liu, chairman of TSMC. Developing and producing the company’s most cutting-edge chips at a rapid pace requires a huge effort, he said, as many as 3,000 research scientists for one generation of the technology.

“We cannot put it anyplace else,” he said.

TSMC has embarked on a global expansion, with two factories under construction in the United States and one in Japan, as well as a possible facility in Germany. It’s part of the company’s strategy to address the calls by U.S. officials to reduce America’s reliance on chips made in Taiwan. That makes the 68-year-old Mr. Liu, who holds a doctoral degree in electronic engineering and computer science, as much a diplomat as a scientist and an executive. He joined TSMC 30 years ago after stints at Intel and Bell Labs, rose through the ranks and today runs the $500 billion company with its CEO and vice chairman, C.C. Wei.

In late June, when he spoke to The New York Times at TSMC’s offices in the northern Taiwan city of Hsinchu, he had just returned from a trip to the United States, which he said he visits roughly every three months.

“We have a pretty good relationship across Congress, the Commerce Department, the White House. I think they know us,” he said.

“China will not invade Taiwan because of semiconductors. China will not NOT invade Taiwan because of semiconductors,” he said. “It is really up to the U.S. and China: How do they maintain the status quo, which both sides want?”

And doubts loom over whether American companies will be willing to pay the likely premium required for chips made in Arizona, where TSMC’s construction costs alone could be at least four times higher than they are in Taiwan. Mr. Liu said he had told the U.S. government that it needed to offer American companies incentives, beyond the $52 billion in subsidies in the CHIPS Act, to buy American-made chips.

“Otherwise, it will be limited,” he said. “It will come to limits pretty quickly. So that is on the table. But I don’t think we have a solution yet.”


The more I think, the more this New York Times article's title seems funny to me. For example Intel, IBM, Texas Instruments, Google, and Microsoft all have big global operations, R&D, and manufacturing activities in many countries. But they all keep their roots in United States.

To ask TSMC such questions, New York Times reporters should have asked the same question to those above companies first.
 
Last edited:
To ask TSMC such questions, New York Times reporters should have asked the same question to those above companies first.

I agree completely. TSMC is clearly being targeted to get clicks. The newsies gotta get clicks. I think this will be one of the times that we look back and say "Wow that was inappropriate". Same thing with the constant talk about China attacking Taiwan.
 
The more I think, the more this New York Times article's title seems funny to me. For example Intel, IBM, Texas Instruments, Google, and Microsoft all have big global operations, R&D, and manufacturing activities in many countries. But they all keeps their roots in United States.

To ask TSMC such questions, New York Times reporters should have asked the same question to those above companies first.
Because Taiwan government has been an outstanding partner for semiconductor businesses there. Use this as example, https://asia.nikkei.com/Business/Te...-boost-its-chipmakers-with-sweeter-tax-breaks

If a business is spending hugely on R&D, they can get 25% back as tax credit. TSMC last year R&D is 5.48B‬ USD, which results in 1.37B in tax credit. If using Intel as example, that is 4.38B in tax credit if Intel is conducting all of its R&D there while Chips Act only grant $13.2 billion in R&D and workforce development. Please note that the tax credit policy will end in 2029, so a total of 7 years including 2023. That would give Intel 30.66B if Intel were to move all of its R&D to Taiwan. This is R&D only. For Capex, there's additional 5% of tax credits to be granted, adding on top of the benefits that already exist (building shell and finding talent is way-way cheaper there compared to US) If we are taking that TSMC's scale or Intel's scale of capital expenditure and research and development, that would result in a saving of more than 52B for either company. (CHIPS Act for whole US and foreign semiconductor companies)
 
So it makes sense that TSMC doesn't want to move to its main operation outside of Taiwan, since no country in the world is offering such attractive policy. And if there's no such threat from China, I bet Intel want to move all of its operations there as well because it just cannot compete at same level
 
I agree completely. TSMC is clearly being targeted to get clicks. The newsies gotta get clicks. I think this will be one of the times that we look back and say "Wow that was politically incorrect". Same thing with the constant talk about China attacking Taiwan.
I never thought I would be defending the New York Times (just the thought makes me light-headed), but TSMC is mostly resident in a country that's not considered an actual country by the US or the United Nations, and China has said they would not rule out taking Taiwan by force. To many readers of the NYT, who are mostly not experts on semiconductor industry or Taiwan's status, I think their questions are politically correct, though perhaps naive.
 
Did things go as planned/promised with Hong Kong? I was there during some protests/riots but I have not been back since the pandemic.
Basically "One country, two systems" is already failed. In Taiwan, 99.9% of politicians would not use HongKong as the example for persuading Taiwanese people to go unification.
 
True, China will only invade militarily if future Taiwan leaders calling for independence from China, or no hope to unite peacefully.

There is no hope whilst CCP still running the show , they are the only group looking to unilaterally change the status quo.
 
"One country, two systems" is still legally alive, but it would be difficult to call it a true success from the papers I've read. But if the alternative is a costly invasion and betting on the US and Japan for defense, I can see where some Taiwan officials five years from now might be tempted by unification negotiations.
Having seen how its gone in Hong Kong why would anyone in Taiwan opt for any form of discussion.

The only group talking invasion is CCP , so how does one negotiate with folk threatening you.

Similar to the Ukraine , how to negotiate with the Putin and his Commie buddies
 
I know lots of people in HK. For most it doesn't change their day to day life very much. Many people there actually support integration with China. But some people feel a serious loss of freedom. Personally I think it's inevitable that Taiwan is eventually integrated into China, and we should hope it's a peaceful reintegration.
 
Back
Top