Array
(
    [content] => 
    [params] => Array
        (
            [0] => /forum/threads/where-are-the-semiconductor-breakthroughs-for-ai.23967/
        )

    [addOns] => Array
        (
            [DL6/MLTP] => 13
            [Hampel/TimeZoneDebug] => 1000070
            [SV/ChangePostDate] => 2010200
            [SemiWiki/Newsletter] => 1000010
            [SemiWiki/WPMenu] => 1000010
            [SemiWiki/XPressExtend] => 1000010
            [ThemeHouse/XLink] => 1000970
            [ThemeHouse/XPress] => 1010570
            [XF] => 2030770
            [XFI] => 1060170
        )

    [wordpress] => /var/www/html
)

Where are the semiconductor breakthroughs for AI?

milesgehm

Active member
It seems like the current attitude is: Apple needs a trillion-parameter model so Daniel can plan his vacation. Apple will buy 0.666 billion Nvidia chips. That requires more power than the Hoover Damn (sic). Solution: buy the chips, build 2 nuclear power plants, charge the people more for the electricity they need to cool/heat their homes. Daniel gets to go on a vacation that is better.

Where are the breakthroughs in architecure and chip design that avoid this disaster?
 


The breakthrough you're asking about exists, and it starts with a radically different approach: what if we could do the same AI computations with 100-100,000x fewer transistors? Dynamic Reconfigurable Data Center Logic (DRDCL), developed by SoftChip, does exactly that by fundamentally rethinking how silicon is utilized. Current AI chips waste enormous resources because they're built as fixed-architecture processors. A typical solution might use 3,200+ transistors where DRDCL uses just 38 - and those 38 transistors can dynamically reconfigure in nanoseconds to perform thousands of different operations. This transistor efficiency translates directly to 100-100,000x power efficiency improvements and 99% power reduction at the datacenter level. The real-world impact: instead of needing two nuclear power plants for Apple's AI infrastructure, DRDCL could deliver equivalent performance using a fraction of the chips and 1MW instead of 100MW.

This isn't theoretical - it's mathematically proven (original paper, addendum) and we're raising capital to develop the silicon compiler that will integrate DRDCL seamlessly into existing chip design workflows. Today's AI infrastructure runs at catastrophic 5-25% utilization for inference workloads - meaning 75-95% of the silicon Daniel's vacation planner uses is sitting completely idle, burning power for nothing. DRDCL's architecture can push utilization to 85-95% while using orders of magnitude less power per computation. We don't need to choose between AI services and heating people's homes - we need architectures that aren't burning $400 billion worth of silicon doing nothing. The mathematical proofs are published. The architecture is patent-pending. The industry needs this now.

- Tom Jackson, Founder & VP Business Development, SoftChip
TJ@SoftChip.tech
 
This isn't theoretical - it's mathematically proven (original paper, addendum) and we're raising capital to develop the silicon compiler that will integrate DRDCL seamlessly into existing chip design workflows.
I respect the writeup and the work your team is doing. This looks honestly exciting, and I'm glad (as a consumer and enthusiast) to see someone is tackling this from a different angle. (Of course - with 1,000x greater power efficiency, software developers can always invent new ways to need 1,000x more energy to achieve the same result -- see Python vs. C++/Assembler in CPU history).

However, I would caution that this efficiency gain is not proven until there's working silicon and independent benchmarks have proven the results.

P.S. What's doubly exciting is - if this does work as stated, you won't even need 'the most advanced node' to (significantly) exceed the performance of GPUs. That could help with cost and availabiltiy of products tremendously. Good luck with this.

Respectfully,
John
 
Back
Top