You are currently viewing SemiWiki as a guest which gives you limited access to the site. To view blog comments and experience other SemiWiki features you must be a registered member. Registration is fast, simple, and absolutely free so please, join our community today!
President Joe Biden delivers remarks during a visit to TSMC AZ's first semiconductor fabrication plant in Phoenix, Ariz., December 6, 2022. (Jonathan Ernst/Reuters)
TSMC announced its intention to invest $12 billion in constructing the Arizona facility in May 2020. That was over a year before the CHIPS Act was introduced, and over two years before it became law.
TSMC was first interested in expanding to Arizona in 2013, when then-governor Jan Brewer visited Taipei. Arizona has been cultivating its relationship with Taiwan for decades, with Phoenix becoming a sister city with Taipei in 1979 and Arizona opening a trade office in Taiwan in 1987. Arizona senator Barry Goldwater sued President Carter in 1978 when he reneged on the U.S. treaty with Taiwan, alleging it was unconstitutional for Carter to do so. That was in the context of Carter opening up relations with communist China, an issue on which Goldwater, as an ardent anti-communist, had opposed both Nixon and Carter.
TSMC has not received funding from the CHIPS Act so far. Bloomberg notes that it is “in line to win $6.6 billion in government grants and $5 billion in loans,” along with tax credits, but not one cent of that has actually arrived in TSMC’s bank account.
The bigger projected beneficiary of the CHIPS Act, Intel, is in very rough shape at the moment. The company has already said it is cutting 15,000 jobs, which is 5,000 more jobs than it expected to add with CHIPS Act funding. Intel is also looking at selling some of its holdings in other companies as part of a corporate overhaul.
Though TSMC’s Arizona success is not a victory for the CHIPS Act, it is a victory for allowing corporations based in allied countries to invest in the U.S. economy — something politicians are currently in the process of blocking in the steel industry.
To the extent that politicians deserve any credit for TSMC’s results at this point, it is for embracing globalization, standing up to communism, and making Arizona a business-friendly state, not for passing corporate welfare. But the credit should really go to the people making the semiconductors.
If politicians deserve credit for TSMC’s results, it is for embracing globalization, standing up to communism, and making Arizona a business-friendly state.
I doubt TSMC will expand in AZ without CHIPS Act money now that other countries are writing big checks. I have a podcast with a CHIPS Act person on monday, I will ask. I too am curious why money has not been disbursed yet and what will happen with Intel and Samsung. How can they build fabs with CHIPS Act money they cannot fill?
1) any “news” from the National Review is actually just an opinion piece. While the author brings up some excellent points about the forces that brought a working leading-edge TSMC fab to Arizona, it’s absolute fiction to claim that it would have happened on the same timeline without CHIPs and associated groundswell. There‘s just no way to know the alternate history based on different decisions 2-3 years ago.
2) That question of “where is the actual money now” is a great one. As of August, 2024, $30B of the $39B in grants had been ”allocated” to 15 companies, which I think means that the CHIPs org has a preliminary contract in place for all of them. I’m guessing that it’s all milestone-based payouts from this point onward, but it would be interesting to hear directly from the CHIPs folks.
www.nationalreview.com