Array ( [content] => [params] => Array ( [0] => /forum/threads/intel-arc-b580.21735/page-4 ) [addOns] => Array ( [DL6/MLTP] => 13 [Hampel/TimeZoneDebug] => 1000070 [SV/ChangePostDate] => 2010200 [SemiWiki/Newsletter] => 1000010 [SemiWiki/WPMenu] => 1000010 [SemiWiki/XPressExtend] => 1000010 [ThemeHouse/XLink] => 1000970 [ThemeHouse/XPress] => 1010570 [XF] => 2021770 [XFI] => 1050270 ) [wordpress] => /var/www/html )
I think B580 Lacked the VRAM that held it's compute back otherwise it's 1/3 the compute of A100
I think B580 Lacked the VRAM that held it's compute back otherwise it's 1/3 the compute of A100
It is not that far from A100!I think B580 Lacked the VRAM that held it's compute back otherwise it's 1/3 the compute of A100
That is what I felt about it after going through the exercise. They should be confident about their products and start competing aggressively.So what, pray tell, are Intel doing with all this Falcon/Jaguar Shores reshuffling if their consumer GPUs are already this competent? I’ve heard it’s to “refocus Jaguar Shores on rack-scale system abilities” so is that the big delay? The core GPU IP and overall system seem quite competent now… gosh, I wish this company could just get it together. It’s all at their fingertips if only they would execute on a good plan for once.