Array
(
    [content] => 
    [params] => Array
        (
            [0] => /forum/threads/us-lawmaker-questions-intel-ceos-ties-to-china-in-letter-to-company-board-chair.23325/
        )

    [addOns] => Array
        (
            [DL6/MLTP] => 13
            [Hampel/TimeZoneDebug] => 1000070
            [SV/ChangePostDate] => 2010200
            [SemiWiki/Newsletter] => 1000010
            [SemiWiki/WPMenu] => 1000010
            [SemiWiki/XPressExtend] => 1000010
            [ThemeHouse/XLink] => 1000970
            [ThemeHouse/XPress] => 1010570
            [XF] => 2021770
            [XFI] => 1050270
        )

    [wordpress] => /var/www/html
)

"US lawmaker questions Intel CEO's ties to China in letter to company board chair"

Arthur Hanson

Well-known member
Any thoughts by the SemiWiki community on this technology breach by Cadence would be appreciated. Will this help in preventing breaches in the future?

 

Any thoughts by the SemiWiki community on this technology breach by Cadence would be appreciated. Will this help in preventing breaches in the future?
even though in practice everyone knows there are loop holes, not just for cadence but the whole EDA industry, having something like this formerly charged and proven guilty is very rare. this must be very bad behind the scenes ...
 
(Sorry it's Reuters again) -

- Senator Cotton sent a letter to Intel's board chair questioning CEO's ties to China
- Cotton questioned what Intel's board knew about subpoenas to Cadence
- Letter asks board chair about Tan's investment disclosures due to Secure Enclave involvement

SAN FRANCISCO, Aug 6 (Reuters) - U.S. Republican Senator Tom Cotton sent a letter to Intel's board chair on Wednesday with questions about the chipmaker's new CEO Lip-Bu Tan's ties to Chinese firms and a recent criminal case involving his former company Cadence Design

Writing to "express concern about the security and integrity of Intel's operations and its potential impact on U.S. national security", Cotton asked in the letter to Intel chairperson Frank Yeary whether the company's board was aware of the subpoenas sent to Cadence during Tan's time there as CEO before Intel hired him. Cotton asked what measures were taken to address those concerns.

He also asked whether Intel's board required Tan to divest from chip firms in China linked to the Chinese military or Communist Party, and if Tan adequately disclosed other ties to Chinese companies due to Intel's involvement in the Secure Enclave program, an initiative designed under the Biden administration to ensure a secure supply of microelectronics for defense.

Because of Intel getting federal funding under the initiative, Cotton questioned Yeary in the letter about Tan's disclosures related to investment, professional roles or other ties to Chinese companies.

"Intel is required to be a responsible steward of American taxpayer dollars and to comply with applicable security regulations," Cotton wrote. "Mr. Tan's associations raise questions about Intel's ability to fulfill these obligations."

In a statement, an Intel spokesperson said, "Intel and Mr. Tan are deeply committed to the national security of the United States and the integrity of our role in the U.S. defense ecosystem." The company said it would address the matters in the letter with the Senator.

In April, Reuters reported Tan - himself or through venture funds he has founded or operates - has invested in hundreds of Chinese companies, some of which are linked to the Chinese military. The Intel CEO invested at least $200 million in hundreds of Chinese advanced manufacturing and chip firms between March 2012 and December 2024, Reuters found.

A source familiar with the matter had at the time told Reuters that Tan had divested from his positions in entities in China, without providing further details. Chinese databases reviewed by Reuters at the time had listed many of his investments as current, and Reuters was at the time unable to establish the extent of his divestitures.

CADENCE REACHES SETTLEMENTS​

It is not illegal for U.S. citizens to hold stakes in Chinese companies, even those with ties to the Chinese military, unless those companies have been added to the U.S. Treasury's Chinese Military-Industrial Complex Companies List, which explicitly bans such investments. Reuters in April had found no evidence that Tan at the time was invested directly in any company on the U.S. Treasury's list.

Separately, last week Cadence Design agreed to plead guilty and pay more than $140 million to resolve charges for selling its chip design products to a Chinese military university, Reuters reported. The institution was believed to be involved in simulating nuclear blasts.

In a filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission, Cadence said it was "pleased" to reach settlements with the Justice and Commerce departments.

Tan ran Cadence as CEO from 2008 through 2021 and was executive chairman until May 2023. The sales to Chinese entities occurred under his leadership at Cadence, which makes design software and other tools used to create chips.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
(Sorry it's Reuters again) -

- Senator Cotton sent a letter to Intel's board chair questioning CEO's ties to China
- Cotton questioned what Intel's board knew about subpoenas to Cadence
- Letter asks board chair about Tan's investment disclosures due to Secure Enclave involvement

SAN FRANCISCO, Aug 6 (Reuters) - U.S. Republican Senator Tom Cotton sent a letter to Intel's board chair on Wednesday with questions about the chipmaker's new CEO Lip-Bu Tan's ties to Chinese firms and a recent criminal case involving his former company Cadence Design

Writing to "express concern about the security and integrity of Intel's operations and its potential impact on U.S. national security", Cotton asked in the letter to Intel chairperson Frank Yeary whether the company's board was aware of the subpoenas sent to Cadence during Tan's time there as CEO before Intel hired him. Cotton asked what measures were taken to address those concerns.

He also asked whether Intel's board required Tan to divest from chip firms in China linked to the Chinese military or Communist Party, and if Tan adequately disclosed other ties to Chinese companies due to Intel's involvement in the Secure Enclave program, an initiative designed under the Biden administration to ensure a secure supply of microelectronics for defense.

Because of Intel getting federal funding under the initiative, Cotton questioned Yeary in the letter about Tan's disclosures related to investment, professional roles or other ties to Chinese companies.

"Intel is required to be a responsible steward of American taxpayer dollars and to comply with applicable security regulations," Cotton wrote. "Mr. Tan's associations raise questions about Intel's ability to fulfill these obligations."

In a statement, an Intel spokesperson said, "Intel and Mr. Tan are deeply committed to the national security of the United States and the integrity of our role in the U.S. defense ecosystem." The company said it would address the matters in the letter with the Senator.

In April, Reuters reported Tan - himself or through venture funds he has founded or operates - has invested in hundreds of Chinese companies, some of which are linked to the Chinese military. The Intel CEO invested at least $200 million in hundreds of Chinese advanced manufacturing and chip firms between March 2012 and December 2024, Reuters found.

A source familiar with the matter had at the time told Reuters that Tan had divested from his positions in entities in China, without providing further details. Chinese databases reviewed by Reuters at the time had listed many of his investments as current, and Reuters was at the time unable to establish the extent of his divestitures.

CADENCE REACHES SETTLEMENTS​

It is not illegal for U.S. citizens to hold stakes in Chinese companies, even those with ties to the Chinese military, unless those companies have been added to the U.S. Treasury's Chinese Military-Industrial Complex Companies List, which explicitly bans such investments. Reuters in April had found no evidence that Tan at the time was invested directly in any company on the U.S. Treasury's list.

Separately, last week Cadence Design agreed to plead guilty and pay more than $140 million to resolve charges for selling its chip design products to a Chinese military university, Reuters reported. The institution was believed to be involved in simulating nuclear blasts.

In a filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission, Cadence said it was "pleased" to reach settlements with the Justice and Commerce departments.

Tan ran Cadence as CEO from 2008 through 2021 and was executive chairman until May 2023. The sales to Chinese entities occurred under his leadership at Cadence, which makes design software and other tools used to create chips.


It would be hard for me to believe that this was not already investigated by the Intel BoD during the CEO vetting process. But then again..... :rolleyes:

I remember the Intel CEO offer did not require Lip-Bu to stop his VC work in China or anywhere else:

The offer letter does not require exclusive devotion. It specifies that Tan is expected to devote “such time as is necessary” to perform his responsibilities as CEO. This is less restrictive than a full-effort clause seen in traditional CEO contracts.

Prior to joining Intel, Tan remained active with other ventures—particularly through his venture capital firm, Walden International, where he invested in startups including many in China. These activities are not explicitly prohibited by the agreement, which instead focuses on the time necessary to fulfill Intel duties


 
Copy of the letter:

Senator Cotton with Intel Hat SemiWiki.jpg


August 5, 2025

Mr. Frank D. Yeary
Chairman of the Board of Directors
Intel Corporation
2200 Mission College Blvd
Santa Clara, CA 95054

Dear Mr. Yeary:

I write to express concern about the security and integrity of Intel’s operations and its potential impact on U.S. national security. In March 2025, Intel appointed Lip‑Bu Tan as its new CEO. Mr. Tan reportedly controls dozens of Chinese companies and has a stake in hundreds of Chinese advanced‑manufacturing and chip firms. At least eight of these companies reportedly have ties to the Chinese People’s Liberation Army.

Mr. Tan was most recently the CEO of Cadence Design Systems, a company that makes electronic design automation (EDA) technology, which is a key enabler of advanced chip design. Last week, Cadence pleaded guilty to illegally selling its products to a Chinese military university and transferring its technology to an associated Chinese semiconductor company without obtaining licenses. These illegal activities occurred under Mr. Tan’s tenure.

Intel was awarded nearly \$8 billion from the CHIPS and Science Act, the largest grant to a single company. Intel is required to be a responsible steward of American taxpayer dollars and to comply with applicable security regulations. Mr. Tan’s associations raise questions about Intel’s ability to fulfill these obligations. In the interest of transparency and national security, I respectfully request a response to the following questions by August 15, 2025.

1. Was the Board aware of Cadence’s subpoenas before hiring Mr. Tan as CEO? If so, what measures were taken to address concerns about Cadence’s activities under Mr. Tan?
2. Did the Board require Mr. Tan to divest from his positions in semiconductor firms linked to the Chinese Communist Party or the People’s Liberation Army and any other concerning entities in China that could pose a conflict of interest for Intel’s CEO?
3. Given Intel’s contract under the Secure Enclave program, has Mr. Tan disclosed any remaining investments, professional roles, or other ties to Chinese companies to the U.S. government?

Thank you for your attention to this matter. I look forward to your response.

Sincerely,

Tom Cotton
United States Senator
 
Last edited:
Well, Tom hasn't disclosed his 2024 investments yet. He requested an extension to avoid doing so with the extension expiring August 13th. Another week from now..
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20250806-162227.png
    Screenshot_20250806-162227.png
    173.6 KB · Views: 3
Copy of the letter:

View attachment 3434


August 5, 2025

Mr. Frank D. Yeary
Chairman of the Board of Directors
Intel Corporation
2200 Mission College Blvd
Santa Clara, CA 95054

Dear Mr. Yeary:

I write to express concern about the security and integrity of Intel’s operations and its potential impact on U.S. national security. In March 2025, Intel appointed Lip‑Bu Tan as its new CEO. Mr. Tan reportedly controls dozens of Chinese companies and has a stake in hundreds of Chinese advanced‑manufacturing and chip firms. At least eight of these companies reportedly have ties to the Chinese People’s Liberation Army.

Mr. Tan was most recently the CEO of Cadence Design Systems, a company that makes electronic design automation (EDA) technology, which is a key enabler of advanced chip design. Last week, Cadence pleaded guilty to illegally selling its products to a Chinese military university and transferring its technology to an associated Chinese semiconductor company without obtaining licenses. These illegal activities occurred under Mr. Tan’s tenure.

Intel was awarded nearly \$8 billion from the CHIPS and Science Act, the largest grant to a single company. Intel is required to be a responsible steward of American taxpayer dollars and to comply with applicable security regulations. Mr. Tan’s associations raise questions about Intel’s ability to fulfill these obligations. In the interest of transparency and national security, I respectfully request a response to the following questions by August 15, 2025.

1. Was the Board aware of Cadence’s subpoenas before hiring Mr. Tan as CEO? If so, what measures were taken to address concerns about Cadence’s activities under Mr. Tan?
2. Did the Board require Mr. Tan to divest from his positions in semiconductor firms linked to the Chinese Communist Party or the People’s Liberation Army and any other concerning entities in China that could pose a conflict of interest for Intel’s CEO?
3. Given Intel’s contract under the Secure Enclave program, has Mr. Tan disclosed any remaining investments, professional roles, or other ties to Chinese companies to the U.S. government?

Thank you for your attention to this matter. I look forward to your response.

Sincerely,

Tom Cotton
United States Senator
These are all excellent questions. But also an example of what good governance should look like (regardless of whether Senator Cotton is himself compliant - see earlier comment - I have absolutely no idea ...). At least in the US you have these processes and controls in place (at least in theory).

I'm not convinced, however, by the "illegal activities occurred under Mr. Tan's tenure" part. If any of this did happen, it seems highly likely that this would be the result of local actions pre-dating LBT's appointment - has he been around long enough to cause such a rapid change in behaviour ? how much of this is local initiatitive vs central direction ? the ARM experience suggests that the local Chinese operation might "go rogue" and use a little too much initiative. But again, it is healthy that such questions can be, and are being, asked.
 
Back
Top