Semiwiki on LinkedIn Semiwiki on Facebook Semiwiki on Twitter Register / Log in 
Array
(
    [content] => 
    [params] => Array
        (
            [0] => /forum/threads/how-intel-stock-falls-to-10.23262/page-2
        )

    [addOns] => Array
        (
            [DL6/MLTP] => 13
            [Hampel/TimeZoneDebug] => 1000070
            [SV/ChangePostDate] => 2010200
            [SemiWiki/Newsletter] => 1000010
            [SemiWiki/WPMenu] => 1000010
            [SemiWiki/XPressExtend] => 1000010
            [ThemeHouse/XLink] => 1000970
            [ThemeHouse/XPress] => 1010570
            [XF] => 2021770
            [XFI] => 1050270
        )

    [wordpress] => /var/www/html
)

How Intel Stock Falls to $10

So a lot of people think Intel has an execution issue, and they do. But they also currently have the wrong strategy.

When Steve Jobs went back to Apple, he famously joked with Bill gates that "The ship is taking on water, and my job is to get it pointed in the right direction". It's not Lip Bu's job to fix all the execution problems at Intel, it's his job to get the company pointed in the right direction. Intel needs a culture change and a strategy change. I would say he is in the middle pushing a culture change, but the strategy change has not happened - yet.

Dropping the IDM model won't fix Intel's past failures, but it will get the company moving back in the right direction. Once they have the strategy and culture fixed, better products will follow.
 
Daniel Nenni said:
Do you think, without fabs, Intel will be a clear leader against AMD and Nvidia? Or just another horse in a big horse?

I agree with you by the way, the safe bet would be to off load manufacturing and milk the x86 cow. But safe bets do not get you maximum stock value over the long run.
Click to expand...

Or can we ask an equally important question: Can Intel survive as an IDM in a semiconductor industry that has embraced the fabless/foundry business model for the past 30 to 40 years?

There are still some IDMs operating around the world, but most of them focus on analog, mixed-signal, industrial, or specialty segments. In the leading edge logic semiconductor space, aside from the smaller Samsung, Intel is the only remaining logic IDM, and both Samsung and Intel are struggling.

If Intel is trapped in an outdated business model, no CEO or strategy can save it.
 
Daniel Nenni said:
I did support Pat G and his IDM 2.0 100%. That was short lived however due to Pat's rantings. I still think IDM 2.0 can succeed but there cannot be any more over-promising. I know Lip-Bu, he sets realistic expectations and exceeds them, he does not overpromise.

I was shocked that Lip-Bu took the Intel job. As you said, he is a busy man and his legacy is at stake. Why would he risk it when he is already golden in the EDA and semiconductor VC world? Lip-Bu clearly has a plan for Intel and I am looking forward to seeing it through. He still has my full support.
Click to expand...
In the first place, when LBT doesn't quit IDM or IFS, I think the direction of the will itself is the same as the PAT.
And Intel Also, Intel 18A hasn't completely provided to external customers.
There are few initial external customers, but it may increase,
Also, even if 14A appears, it does not mean that 18A will not be necessary.
 
count said:
So a lot of people think Intel has an execution issue, and they do. But they also currently have the wrong strategy.

When Steve Jobs went back to Apple, he famously joked with Bill gates that "The ship is taking on water, and my job is to get it pointed in the right direction". It's not Lip Bu's job to fix all the execution problems at Intel, it's his job to get the company pointed in the right direction. Intel needs a culture change and a strategy change. I would say he is in the middle pushing a culture change, but the strategy change has not happened - yet.

Dropping the IDM model won't fix Intel's past failures, but it will get the company moving back in the right direction. Once they have the strategy and culture fixed, better products will follow.
Click to expand...
I don't think just throwing away the IdM will not solve the problem.
 
tomatoma said:
I don't think just throwing away the IdM will not solve the problem.
Click to expand...

If Intel is split into Intel Products and Intel Foundry, one or both may have a higher chance of survival. On the other hand, keeping both under the IDM model might end up killing them both.

There’s no clear reason to believe that the IDM business model, abandoned by most of the semiconductor industry over the past 30+ years, will suddenly start working for Intel.
 
hist78 said:
If Intel is split into Intel Products and Intel Foundry, one or both may have a higher chance of survival. On the other hand, keeping both under the IDM model might end up killing them both.

There’s no clear reason to believe that the IDM business model, abandoned by most of the semiconductor industry over the past 30+ years, will suddenly start working for Intel.
Click to expand...

I think I read some one commented that the chips act might have prevented Intel from completely spinning out IFS. Perhaps they still need to maintain 51%
 
Y.H said:
I think I read some one commented that the chips act might have prevented Intel from completely spinning out IFS. Perhaps they still need to maintain 51%
Click to expand...

Everything is negotiable. Don’t take that clause too seriously. Trump can’t kill the CHIPS Act on one hand and then ask Intel to keep its obligations under the CHIPS Act on the other.
 
Spinning off IFS will actually kill Intel products in long term right now they are maintaining share through IFS Simply due to the existence of Intel 7.
Intel Products haven't shown a good product on External node that is PPA Competitive.
AMD is winning due to having better product on TSMC Node while being half node behind(N4P vs N3B) while should be embassies.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top