Array ( [content] => [params] => Array ( [0] => /forum/threads/china-has-spent-billions-of-dollars-building-far-too-many-data-centers-for-ai-and-compute-could-it-lead-to-a-huge-market-crash.22511/page-2 ) [addOns] => Array ( [DL6/MLTP] => 13 [Hampel/TimeZoneDebug] => 1000070 [SV/ChangePostDate] => 2010200 [SemiWiki/Newsletter] => 1000010 [SemiWiki/WPMenu] => 1000010 [SemiWiki/XPressExtend] => 1000010 [ThemeHouse/XLink] => 1000970 [ThemeHouse/XPress] => 1010570 [XF] => 2021770 [XFI] => 1050270 ) [wordpress] => /var/www/html )
Until the jobs disappear. Almost half the factories for gas powered cars in China, all partially subsidized by local municipalities, will close in the period from 2022 to 2025.Most local government's subsidies are lands used to build those factories.
The cost is minimal compared to the outcome of job creation.
I would say China's strategy in the automotive industry paid off. China would not have been able to develop (and subsequently dominate) it's EV industry if it hadn't developed the workforce in manufacturing ICE cars first. When a ICE car factory, which is probably a JV with a US company and all the associated IP and knowhow is from the US, Germany, and Japan, is replaced with an EV factory that's fully Chinese, it's a win for China.Until the jobs disappear. Almost half the factories for gas powered cars in China, all partially subsidized by local municipalities, will close in the period from 2022 to 2025.
80% of the country's new data center capacity is unused, reports say!
China’s AI infrastructure boom is faltering, as according to a report in MIT Technology Review, the country built hundreds of data centers to support its AI ambitions, but many are now sitting unused.
- DeepSeek is just one of the many reasons China's AI growth simply didn't materialize.
- Up to 80% of new data center capacity hasn't been used according to local sources.
- Should this capacity hit the wider market, it could cause a major headache to data center developers?
Billions were invested by both state and private entities in 2023 and 2024, with the expectation that demand for GPU rentals would keep growing, but uptake has in fact dropped off, and as a result many operators are now struggling to survive.
Much of the early momentum was driven by hype. The government, keen for China to become a global leader in AI, encouraged local officials to fast-track data center construction with the result that more than 500 projects were announced nationwide, and at least 150 were completed by the end of 2024, according to state-affiliated sources. However, MIT Technology Review says local publications are reporting that up to 80% of this new computing capacity remains idle.
Selling off GPUs
Location is also a problem, MIT Technology Review notes. Facilities built in central and western China, where electricity is cheap, now face issues meeting latency requirements. In cities like Zhengzhou, operators are reportedly even giving away free compute vouchers in an attempt to lure users.
In some regions, developers began selling off GPUs after failing to secure long-term clients.
Xiao Li, a data center project manager who spoke with MIT Technology Review, said many WeChat groups that once boasted about Nvidia chip deals have gone quiet. “It seems like everyone is selling, but few are buying,” he noted.
Should this capacity hit the wider market, it could cause a major headache to data center developers, flooding an already soft sector with even more supply and pushing prices down further.
https://www.techradar.com/pro/china...-compute-could-it-lead-to-a-huge-market-crash
Nonsense.Under a pure capitalist system with no artificial barriers to entry, margins are also supposed to be close to zero. That's the function of the invisible hand after all.
China’s rapacious export-driven growth has planted the seeds of its own destruction, by forcing premature deindustrialization throughout the developing world. Most of the rest of the developing world has been indelibly harmed by Chinese exports through decimation of their own paths to higher income via manufacturing. What happens when these countries, plus the US and EU dial down Chinese imports.Yes there are domestic casualties along the way, but the biggest casualties are GM, Mercedes, Honda, ect and China has become the worlds biggest auto exporter.
China’s rapacious export-driven growth has planted the seeds of its own destruction, by forcing premature deindustrialization throughout the developing world. Most of the rest of the developing world has been indelibly harmed by Chinese exports through decimation of their own paths to higher income via manufacturing. What happens when these countries, plus the US and EU dial down Chinese imports.
![]()
The Long, Slow Death of Global Development - American Affairs Journal
Most emerging markets have not found an engine of durable growth comparable to manufacturing—most have indeed grown over the last few decades, but dependence on services and commodities exports has not made them rich. Thus most “developing” countries—we are skeptical of that euphemistic...americanaffairsjournal.org
We’re starting to live in a world where export-driven manufacturing growth is a mistake.
Hoping Mr Trump can keep up his promise and his China tariffs, forcing and purging Chinese cheap goods out of our system.
Consequently, the relentless Chinese cheap goods (they have to keep making them) will flood the rest of the world (ROW), which not only will decimate ROW's chance in developing their own manufacturing industries and improved economies, but also make the ROW poorer because of lack of employment.
Within 2 years, it will be a war of the world vs. China, at least economically.
I would say China's strategy in the automotive industry paid off. China would not have been able to develop (and subsequently dominate) it's EV industry if it hadn't developed the workforce in manufacturing ICE cars first. When a ICE car factory, which is probably a JV with a US company and all the associated IP and knowhow is from the US, Germany, and Japan, is replaced with an EV factory that's fully Chinese, it's a win for China.
I don't know about that,I don't think the experience of ICE car manufacturing is relevant in EV manufacturing
If Chinese EV development benefits from ICE car JV with Western/Japanese companies,then why is that the same Western/Japanese companies are struggling in EV development?Given that they have far more ICE experiences than China
Building EVs is a far lower technology barriers to enter market.
On the mechanical side, PRC cars are still far, far behind Japanese, Germans, and even French.
Underneath the modern panelling, usually a very very old licensed platform from US, or European car maker stuffed with electric powertrain.
They do make good EVs. They just don't make them as cheaply as the Chinese brands. Since I've never seen an actual Chinese EV, I can't judge their quality. I can say definitively that Teslas are not built to the quality level (as in fit, finish, and interior design and implementation) as any traditional US or European manufacturer at similar price points.Is that the reason why traditional auto manufacturers cannot make good EV?Because it's too easy?
I haven't heard about these JVs. Do you have references?EU is trying to get Chinese EV manufacturers to setup JV with European manufacturers in Europe,and ask tech transfer from Chinese EV manufacturers. Why would they need tech transfer if EV is so “simple” to make?
You mean their market share is declining in China. I wonder how much of that decline is due to lower prices and nationalism?Europe/American/Japanese machinery makers are facing stiff competition from China,and their market share is declining day by day. That is the reflection of the increasing recognition of Chinese mechanical system world wide
Me either.Never heard of any Chinese EV uses “very very old licensed platform from US, or European car maker”,BYD’s famous DMI platform is self developed
but they do platform sharing with ICE vehicles, and the Chinese and Tesla don't.
EU is trying to get Chinese EV manufacturers to setup JV with European manufacturers in Europe,and ask tech transfer from Chinese EV manufacturers. Why would they need tech transfer if EV is so “simple” to make?