Array
(
    [content] => 
    [params] => Array
        (
            [0] => /forum/threads/sen-warren-intel-is-a-failing-company.23540/
        )

    [addOns] => Array
        (
            [DL6/MLTP] => 13
            [Hampel/TimeZoneDebug] => 1000070
            [SV/ChangePostDate] => 2010200
            [SemiWiki/Newsletter] => 1000010
            [SemiWiki/WPMenu] => 1000010
            [SemiWiki/XPressExtend] => 1000010
            [ThemeHouse/XLink] => 1000970
            [ThemeHouse/XPress] => 1010570
            [XF] => 2021770
            [XFI] => 1050270
        )

    [wordpress] => /var/www/html
)

Sen. Warren: Intel is a failing company

osnium

Well-known member
Sen. Warren’s letter to Secretary Lutnick about the Intel investment:

1757042019254.png


The Honorable Howard Lutnick
SecretaryDepartment of Commerce
1401 Constitution Ave. NWWashington, D.C. 20230

Dear Secretary Lutnick:

I write with great concern about President Donald Trump’s decision to invest $8.9 billion of taxpayer dollars in Intel, taking a 10% stake in the company, without any conditions or safeguards to ensure that American workers and taxpayers benefit. Intel is a failing company. After spending years focused on chasing short-term profits at the expense of long-term investments in its competitiveness, the company’s share price fell 60 percent last year. Yet the President has handed billions of dollars to Intel, with no meaningful strings attached.

The Biden Administration, as part of its implementation of the CHIPS Act, awarded Intel nearly$8 billion in 2024. That grant came with a clear deliverable: Intel was to invest over $100 billion in new fabs and facilities across the country.1 It also came with specific guardrails to protect the public. Under the agreement, Intel agreed to generally refrain from stock buybacks for five years, 2 work closely with labor unions, and expand affordable childcare. 3 If Intel made excessive profits from its investments, the government would share a portion of those profits. 4 And the entire agreement was enforceable, with specific milestones that Intel would need to achieve before it receives the next disbursement of public funds.

.......

 
Gotta love politics. Just a quick summary:

1757042410578.png


Senator Elizabeth Warren's letter to Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, dated September 3, 2025, criticizes President Trump's decision to invest $8.9 billion in taxpayer funds for a 10% stake in Intel without safeguards. She portrays Intel as a failing company (stock down 60% last year) that prioritized short-term profits over long-term investments. Warren contrasts this with the Biden Administration's 2024 CHIPS Act grant to Intel, which included conditions like a $100B investment commitment, no stock buybacks for five years, union collaboration, affordable childcare, and profit-sharing with the government.

Under Trump's deal, announced August 22, 2025, after meeting Intel CEO Lip-Bu Tan, the grants were converted to equity, discharging most CHIPS obligations (per Intel's SEC filing), including onshoring requirements. The government gets no board seat or independent voting rights, must align with the board, and faces high risks from Intel's declining revenue, job cuts (25,000 planned), and operational struggles. Warren warns of potential adverse effects like limited strategic deals, foreign regulations, and stakeholder backlash.

She advocates for responsible equity stakes in public-good companies (citing her co-sponsored CHIPS amendment with Sen. Sanders) but calls Trump's approach chaotic and favoring special interests, allowing possible offshoring, buybacks, and dividends. Warren urges learning from this "bad deal" for future interventions and poses nine questions on authority, remaining obligations, negotiators, taxpayer protections, exit terms, buyback/dividend restrictions, union safeguards, and voting rights, requesting responses by September 17, 2025.
 
Back
Top