Array
(
[content] =>
[params] => Array
(
[0] => /forum/whats-new/latest-activity?before_id=89755
)
[addOns] => Array
(
[DL6/MLTP] => 13
[Hampel/TimeZoneDebug] => 1000070
[SV/ChangePostDate] => 2010200
[SemiWiki/Newsletter] => 1000010
[SemiWiki/WPMenu] => 1000010
[SemiWiki/XPressExtend] => 1000010
[ThemeHouse/XLink] => 1000970
[ThemeHouse/XPress] => 1010570
[XF] => 2021770
[XFI] => 1050270
)
[wordpress] => /var/www/html
)
You are currently viewing SemiWiki as a guest which gives you limited access to the site. To view blog comments and experience other SemiWiki features you must be a registered member. Registration is fast, simple, and absolutely free so please,
join our community today !
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser .
X
P.S. Here's "blueone" in the Pentium-M Days
Aug 11, 2025
X
I thought it was silly Intel didn't do IMC with C2, but, Core 2 sticking with the FSB had two advantages:
- Nvidia nForce chipset gave...
Aug 11, 2025
X
Well the Unified Core is based on Atom that is replacing future P cores and atom has evolved in a. Nice way.
As for x86 the only problem...
Aug 11, 2025
C
I think Walden International may have to invest in some Trump affiliated cryptocurrency and these concerns might go away. Removing...
Aug 11, 2025
M
Totally agree... everyone here saying Intel MUST have a foundry to be relevant is conveniently ignoring all the fabless companies out...
Aug 11, 2025
M
Luckily, Companies are making plans so they do not have to work with the US. This is the answer to "What would Tony Soprano/ Vito...
Aug 11, 2025
Totally agree... everyone here saying Intel MUST have a foundry to be relevant is conveniently ignoring all the fabless companies out...
Aug 11, 2025
B
Well the Unified Core is based on Atom that is replacing future P cores and atom has evolved in a. Nice way.
As for x86 the only problem...
Aug 11, 2025
C
Totally agree... everyone here saying Intel MUST have a foundry to be relevant is conveniently ignoring all the fabless companies out...
Aug 11, 2025
C
These ideas are really missing the sad reality point IMHO:
1) People had a chance to work with Intel Foundry. They chose not to. There...
Aug 11, 2025
These ideas are really missing the sad reality point IMHO:
1) People had a chance to work with Intel Foundry. They chose not to. There...
Aug 11, 2025
M
These ideas are really missing the sad reality point IMHO:
1) People had a chance to work with Intel Foundry. They chose not to. There...
Aug 11, 2025
B
https://semiwiki.com/semiconductor-manufacturers/intel/360006-should-intel-be-split-in-half/
Aug 11, 2025
Any CEO’s decisions, strategies, and vision can greatly impact a company’s future long after his or her retirement. They can determine...
Aug 11, 2025
S
It would more register even though register are renamed during OOO the results have to be written to physical registers and when the...
Aug 11, 2025
Like.
Well the Unified Core is based on Atom that is replacing future P cores and atom has evolved in a. Nice way. As for x86 the only problem...
hist78 reacted to count's post in the thread Former Intel CEO Craig Barrett on saving Intel with