Array ( [content] => [params] => Array ( [0] => /forum/threads/will-the-chinese-deepseek-ai-upset-the-ai-ml-race.21768/page-2 ) [addOns] => Array ( [DL6/MLTP] => 13 [Hampel/TimeZoneDebug] => 1000070 [SV/ChangePostDate] => 2010200 [SemiWiki/Newsletter] => 1000010 [SemiWiki/WPMenu] => 1000010 [SemiWiki/XPressExtend] => 1000010 [ThemeHouse/XLink] => 1000970 [ThemeHouse/XPress] => 1010570 [XF] => 2021770 [XFI] => 1050270 ) [wordpress] => /var/www/html )
The point is, for the same Tiananmen question, ChatGPT gave a better answer, or at least an answer:
View attachment 2733
I showed this to my supervisor. It seems OpenAI's RLHF incorporated elements of DEI.DeepSeek will be sensitive to topics China is sensitive to, ChatGPT is also sensitive to certain topics. Either way you are consuming propaganda by using any of these models.
If your supervisor is in the US, that’s a wrong answer. Protected classes don’t stem from DEI, but rather the Equal Employment Opportunity Act of 1972.I showed this to my supervisor. It seems OpenAI's RLHF incorporated elements of DEI.
Thank you for pointing that out. That is the reason I put a question mark there.If your supervisor is in the US, that’s a wrong answer. Protected classes don’t stem from DEI, but rather the Equal Employment Opportunity Act of 1972.
Not sure of your question. But Executive Orders don’t change legislation.Thank you for pointing that out. That is the reason I put a question mark there.
Is that law clause related to the following announcement?
![]()
Ending Illegal Discrimination And Restoring Merit-Based Opportunity
By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, it is hereby ordered:Section 1. Purpose.www.whitehouse.gov
That means the prompt explicitly disparages some group of people, based on being in some class or category.I showed this to my supervisor. It seems OpenAI's RLHF incorporated elements of DEI.
My understanding is that all classes should be equal and merit-based. I didn’t get the reason for embedding preferential bias when reading that technical material.That means the prompt explicitly disparages some group of people, based on being in some class or category.
Right, a protected class would be for example, gender, in itself (not female gender).My understanding is that all classes should be equal and merit-based. I didn’t get the reason for embedding preferential bias when reading that technical material.
Intel's former CEO says the market is getting DeepSeek wrong after AI chip stock rout
Pat Gelsinger
@PGelsinger
Wisdom is learning the lessons we thought we already knew. DeepSeek reminds us of three important learnings from computing history:1) Computing obeys the gas law. Making it dramatically cheaper will expand the market for it. The markets are getting it wrong, this will make AI much more broadly deployed.2) Engineering is about constraints. The Chinese engineers had limited resources, and they had to find creative solutions.3) Open Wins. DeepSeek will help reset the increasingly closed world of foundational AI model work. Thank you DeepSeek team.
Wow. the former CEO of THE x86 company endorsing open source. Hm...
Intel has always been proponent of open source software, for hardware not so much, but RISC-V was a fascination for a very short time. As for PG, he was not much of a proponent of open source software when he was CEO of VMware.Wow. the former CEO of THE x86 company endorsing open source. Hm...
Well Intel has many open source things like their rendering toolkit which got nominated for. Academy award Intel has many open source stuff probably they are one of the Top 5 companies with open source contributionWow. the former CEO of THE x86 company endorsing open source. Hm...
Wow!
(Bloomberg) -- Nvidia Corp.’s plunge, fueled by investor concern about Chinese artificial-intelligence startup DeepSeek, erased a record amount of stock-market value from the world’s largest company.
Nvidia shares tumbled 17% Monday, the biggest drop since March 2020, erasing $589 billion from the company’s market capitalization. That eclipsed the previous record — a 9% drop in September that wiped out about $279 billion in value — and was the biggest in US stock-market history.
The drop rippled through the rest of the market due to how much weight Nvidia has in major indexes. Including Monday’s slump, Nvidia selloffs have caused eight of the top ten biggest one-day drops in the S&P 500 Index, based on market value, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. The S&P 500 fell 1.5% Monday and the Nasdaq 100 tumbled nearly 3%.
The semiconductor maker led a broader selloff in technology stocks after DeepSeek’s low-cost approach reignited concerns that big US companies have poured too much money into developing artificial intelligence. The Chinese firm appears to provide a comparable performance at a fraction of the price.
All About DeepSeek and Its Lower-Cost AI Model: QuickTake
The latest AI model of DeepSeek, released last week, is widely seen as competitive with those of OpenAI and Meta Platforms Inc. The open-sourced product was founded by quant-fund chief Liang Wenfeng and is now at the top of Apple Inc.’s App Store rankings.
“Concerns have immediately emerged that it could be a disruptor to the current AI business model, which relies on high end chips and extensive computing power and hence energy,” Jefferies analysts said in a note to clients.
Nvidia has been the biggest beneficiary of the influx in spending on AI because they design semiconductors used in the technology. While that heavy spending looks poised to continue, investors may grow wary of rewarding companies that aren’t showing a sufficient return on the investment.
Meta announced plans on Friday to boost capital expenditures on AI projects this year by about half to as much as $65 billion, sending its shares to a record high. That came on the heels of OpenAI, SoftBank Group Corp. and Oracle Corp. announcing a $100 billion joint venture called Stargate to build out data centers and AI infrastructure projects around the US.
In a bid to stall China’s progress in AI, the US has banned the export of advanced semiconductor technologies to the country and is limiting sales of advanced Nvidia AI chips to others. But DeepSeek’s progress suggests Chinese AI engineers have found a way to work around the export bans, focusing on greater efficiency with limited resources.
Nvidia said in a statement Monday that DeepSeek’s model is an “excellent AI advancement” and indicated that the Chinese company didn’t violate US restrictions that limit access to advanced US chips in creating its technology. It also added that inference, or the work of running AI models, requires “requires significant numbers of Nvidia GPUs and high-performance networking.”