Array
(
    [content] => 
    [params] => Array
        (
            [0] => /forum/threads/pumping-the-oil-of-the-21st-century-tsmc-versus-intel.24428/page-2
        )

    [addOns] => Array
        (
            [DL6/MLTP] => 13
            [Hampel/TimeZoneDebug] => 1000070
            [SV/ChangePostDate] => 2010200
            [SemiWiki/Newsletter] => 1000010
            [SemiWiki/WPMenu] => 1000010
            [SemiWiki/XPressExtend] => 1000010
            [ThemeHouse/XLink] => 1000970
            [ThemeHouse/XPress] => 1010570
            [XF] => 2030871
            [XFI] => 1060170
        )

    [wordpress] => /var/www/html
)

Pumping the oil of the 21st century: TSMC versus INTEL

"At the same time TSMC can not complain: they got Chips-act money, cheap loan, 35% tax break and loan guarantees by the Taiwan government in the 250 B investment treaty with US. In total it means all the Arizona investments of 165 B$ by TSMC are also heavily subsidized, and they can import chips from Taiwan for 0 tariff for their US customers as long as the Arizona Giga-campus is under construction. So, all this money for TSMC will help them as well to grow their gross margin and net profit margin."

I believe there is an error in your table (or Google's AI generated table) and analysis.

The $250 billion loan credit guarantees are for an additional $250 billion of investment in the United States, this is not part of the $250 billion direct investment in the US (the majority is coming from TSMC). The $250 billion loan guarantees are backed by Taiwan’s government, not by the US government, and not for TSMC, or at least not totally for TSMC.

It seems NVIDIA's CEO likes the Taiwan-US trade deal very much and praises TSMC as being very important in that deal.

He just arrived in Taiwan for some special events and a hair cut:


https://wccftech.com/nvidia-ceo-to-...ar-dinner-with-taiwanese-partners-this-month/
 
Last edited:
Yes Intel is stronger. Intel is in the lead with BSPD for example. Others are following but Intel is the leader. Packaging revenue will come but it will not be big margins. There really needs to be wafers packaged in there. Again, this is the NOT TSMC packaging market.
BPSD is not packaging, it is wafer processing.... if you want to say Intel knows how to package it,... fair enough. But <1% of worlds logic wafers made in 2026 and probably even 2027 will be BPSD (obviously only Intel)

I assume by packaging, you mean CoWoS/Foveros type. Is the plan that Intel would package TSMC wafers from external customers onto a Intel Wafer interposer? Or they just choose Intel wafers for Intel packaging?
 
Back
Top