Array
(
    [content] => 
    [params] => Array
        (
            [0] => /forum/threads/natcast-to-lay-off-majority-of-its-staff.23596/
        )

    [addOns] => Array
        (
            [DL6/MLTP] => 13
            [Hampel/TimeZoneDebug] => 1000070
            [SV/ChangePostDate] => 2010200
            [SemiWiki/Newsletter] => 1000010
            [SemiWiki/WPMenu] => 1000010
            [SemiWiki/XPressExtend] => 1000010
            [ThemeHouse/XLink] => 1000970
            [ThemeHouse/XPress] => 1010570
            [XF] => 2021770
            [XFI] => 1050270
        )

    [wordpress] => /var/www/html
)

Natcast to Lay Off Majority of Its Staff

osnium

Well-known member
Natcast could have been the US equivalent of imec if it was permitted to run.

From the article:

Natcast, the non-profit organization created to run the U.S. CHIPS & Science Act’s National Semiconductor Technology Center (NSTC) told the majority of its staff they would be laid off this week, IEEE Spectrum has learned. A small core team will continue on to shut Natcast down over the next few weeks, a person familiar with the matter said.

The organization was founded in 2023 to run NSTC, which the law established to conduct “research and prototyping of advanced semiconductor technology and grow the domestic semiconductor workforce to strengthen the economic competitiveness and security of the domestic supply chain.”

However, on 25 August Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick stated that the department would not deliver the US $7.4 billion in funds under its contract with the government. In an accusatory letter to Natcast CEO Deirdre Hanford and a press release, Lutnick claimed the nonprofit was not created legally, and said that the National Institute of Standards and Technology would be taking over NSTC operations.

 
Natcast could have been the US equivalent of imec if it was permitted to run.


From the article:

Natcast, the non-profit organization created to run the U.S. CHIPS & Science Act’s National Semiconductor Technology Center (NSTC) told the majority of its staff they would be laid off this week, IEEE Spectrum has learned. A small core team will continue on to shut Natcast down over the next few weeks, a person familiar with the matter said.

The organization was founded in 2023 to run NSTC, which the law established to conduct “research and prototyping of advanced semiconductor technology and grow the domestic semiconductor workforce to strengthen the economic competitiveness and security of the domestic supply chain.”

However, on 25 August Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick stated that the department would not deliver the US $7.4 billion in funds under its contract with the government. In an accusatory letter to Natcast CEO Deirdre Hanford and a press release, Lutnick claimed the nonprofit was not created legally, and said that the National Institute of Standards and Technology would be taking over NSTC operations.

It's a sad ending.
 
The closest thing would be the joint IBM-Globalfoundries-Samsung operation running at Albany I think. IBM is still there I think, dunno about the others.
 
Why do we need Natcast and NIST? Natcast is non-profit but how big is their payroll? Just what were the 100+ employees actually doing? I know Deirdre Hanford and you will never hear anything bad about her. She is a very ethical person but I still have questions. She was at Synopsys at its inception (37 years) so I doubt she needs the money. She started as an Applications Engineer and finished as Chief Security Officer doing government programs.

Anyone appointed by the previous administration has a target on their back. Politics. 😖 It will be interesting to see the NATCAST Form 990 to see what the executive staff was paid. Our tax dollars hard at work.
 
Why do we need Natcast and NIST? Natcast is non-profit but how big is their payroll? Just what were the 100+ employees actually doing? I know Deirdre Hanford and you will never hear anything bad about her. She is a very ethical person but I still have questions. She was at Synopsys at its inception (37 years) so I doubt she needs the money. She started as an Applications Engineer and finished as Chief Security Officer doing government programs.

Anyone appointed by the previous administration has a target on their back. Politics. 😖 It will be interesting to see the NATCAST Form 990 to see what the executive staff was paid. Our tax dollars hard at work.
These kinds of government spearheaded initiatives will be effective in China, where the government has tremendous sway over the tech. companies, either through overt political pressure, or through incentives like the big fund. There are also a lot of SOEs there to begin with.

In a way, it is ironic that it is this admin. that killed Natcast, isn't more control of the private sector what they want.
 
These kinds of government spearheaded initiatives will be effective in China, where the government has tremendous sway over the tech. companies, either through overt political pressure, or through incentives like the big fund. There are also a lot of SOEs there to begin with.

In a way, it is ironic that it is this admin. that killed Natcast, isn't more control of the private sector what they want.

The current administration is not a fan of the CHIPs Act so this is not a surprise. The NIST head, nominated by Joe Biden, stepped down at the end of last year and the new person Craig Burkhardt is a longtime GOP election-law attorney. Politics.
 
The current administration is not a fan of the CHIPs Act so this is not a surprise. The NIST head, nominated by Joe Biden, stepped down at the end of last year and the new person Craig Burkhardt is a longtime GOP election-law attorney. Politics.
politics certainly is a big factor here. But it is indeed going to be very interesting to see, if possible, what Natcast is spending their resource. No doubt there are significant waste, comes with the government spending
 
Back
Top