siliconbruh999
Well-known member
One of the Intel PTL slides comparing the nearly same uARch on N3B and 18A as close as we can get
Array ( [content] => [params] => Array ( [0] => /forum/threads/n3b-lion-cove-in-lnl-vs-18a-cougar-cove-lnc.23763/ ) [addOns] => Array ( [DL6/MLTP] => 13 [Hampel/TimeZoneDebug] => 1000070 [SV/ChangePostDate] => 2010200 [SemiWiki/Newsletter] => 1000010 [SemiWiki/WPMenu] => 1000010 [SemiWiki/XPressExtend] => 1000010 [ThemeHouse/XLink] => 1000970 [ThemeHouse/XPress] => 1010570 [XF] => 2030770 [XFI] => 1060170 ) [wordpress] => /var/www/html )
View attachment 3724
One of the Intel PTL slides comparing the nearly same uARch on N3B and 18A as close as we can get
Estimated performance * estimated power * estimated architecture differences = ???so 18a is 10% higher performance than N3B at given power. Is that correct?
I agree. That chart looks really suspicious. I think that would have made even Gelsinger blush.Estimated performance * estimated power * estimated architecture differences = ???.
Never trust a slide with unmarked axes. Instant lab fail when I was at school and university. Also, why do they use the wording "at similar performance/power" ? The normal wording would be "higher performance at the same power".I agree. That chart looks really suspicious. I think that would have made even Gelsinger blush.
Yes or 40% lower power at the same performanceso 18a is 10% higher performance than N3B at given power. Is that correct?