Array
(
    [content] => 
    [params] => Array
        (
            [0] => /forum/threads/n3b-lion-cove-in-lnl-vs-18a-cougar-cove-lnc.23763/
        )

    [addOns] => Array
        (
            [DL6/MLTP] => 13
            [Hampel/TimeZoneDebug] => 1000070
            [SV/ChangePostDate] => 2010200
            [SemiWiki/Newsletter] => 1000010
            [SemiWiki/WPMenu] => 1000010
            [SemiWiki/XPressExtend] => 1000010
            [ThemeHouse/XLink] => 1000970
            [ThemeHouse/XPress] => 1010570
            [XF] => 2030770
            [XFI] => 1060170
        )

    [wordpress] => /var/www/html
)

N3B Lion Cove in LNL vs 18A Cougar Cove(LNC+)

siliconbruh999

Well-known member
1760020006456.jpeg

One of the Intel PTL slides comparing the nearly same uARch on N3B and 18A as close as we can get
 
Interesting the "est" at the bottom - these are estimates for both performance and power, and not actually measured.

The benchmark itself *appears* to be single threaded, which I actually take as a good sign here - it's easy to show higher performance with more cores. But per-core performance is what matters most to users at this point.
 
I agree. That chart looks really suspicious. I think that would have made even Gelsinger blush.
Never trust a slide with unmarked axes. Instant lab fail when I was at school and university. Also, why do they use the wording "at similar performance/power" ? The normal wording would be "higher performance at the same power".
 
Back
Top