You are currently viewing SemiWiki as a guest which gives you limited access to the site. To view blog comments and experience other SemiWiki features you must be a registered member. Registration is fast, simple, and absolutely free so please, join our community today!
Samsung Electronics Co. has sharply increased its production yield of the industry’s most advanced 3-nanometer chips for fabless clients, according to in
www.kedglobal.com
South Korean sources further asserted TSMC's yield would be 50% at most.
Samsung Electronics Co. has sharply increased its production yield of the industry’s most advanced 3-nanometer chips for fabless clients, according to in
www.kedglobal.com
South Korean sources further asserted TSMC's yield would be 50% at most.
Tiny died Bitcoin mining asics that don't care about Perf and that's about it. Be it a failure on Samsung design, foundry, (or more likely both) 3GAE isn't even in exynos socs (and we have no indication when they will use 3GAE).
What really cinches it for me though is not the "perfect yields" (it is a very close second though), but the ROC and ROK "press" fangirling about their own nation's chip giant's "totally accurate" "yields" while trying to tear the other down. From what I can gather this fangirling isn't even new either. All told though everything about this article is *chef's kiss* tres magnifique.
[인포스탁데일리=이동희 기자] 삼성전자가 삼성반도체 파운드리 최첨단 수율 허위보고 문제에 이어 수율확보를 이유로 집행된 자금의 행방에 대해서도 확대 조사할 방침인 것으로 알려졌다.21일 인포스탁데일리 취재에 따르면 최근 진행된 삼성전자 DS부문에 대한 경영진단은 비메모리 3나노와 4나노에 이어 5나노 확보수율도 함께 들여다보고 있다.삼성전자 내부 사정에 밝은 한 관계자는 “최근 밀려드는 파운드리 수주물량보다 생산되는 물량이 적어 납기에 애를 먹고 있다는 점에서 확보됐다던 비메모리 최첨단 공정 수율에 의구심을 갖는 것이 사실”이라고
www.infostockdaily.co.kr
Samsung Electronics' management diagnosis is interpreted as putting weight on the possibility that the yield of the state-of-the-art process reported to the top group by former and current management of the DS division is false. It is said that the management diagnosis goes beyond Samsung Electronics' foundry division and also investigates whether or not the investment money that went into securing the yield of the cutting-edge process was properly used.
Tiny died Bitcoin mining asics that don't care about Perf and that's about it. Be it a failure on Samsung design, foundry, (or more likely both) 3GAE isn't even in exynos socs (and we have no indication when they will use 3GAE).
What really cinches it for me though is not the "perfect yields" (it is a very close second though), but the ROC and ROK "press" fangirling about their own nation's chip giant's "totally accurate" "yields" while trying to tear the other down. From what I can gather this fangirling isn't even new either. All told though everything about this article is *chef's kiss* tres magnifique.
We all know the Samsung conglomerate has its tentacles around all aspects of Korean life. I would not be surprised in the least if Korean media is totally compromised by their interests. The very fact this article feels the need to denigrate tsmcs yields says it all really. This reeks of desperation on Samsungs part more then anything…
[인포스탁데일리=이동희 기자] 삼성전자가 삼성반도체 파운드리 최첨단 수율 허위보고 문제에 이어 수율확보를 이유로 집행된 자금의 행방에 대해서도 확대 조사할 방침인 것으로 알려졌다.21일 인포스탁데일리 취재에 따르면 최근 진행된 삼성전자 DS부문에 대한 경영진단은 비메모리 3나노와 4나노에 이어 5나노 확보수율도 함께 들여다보고 있다.삼성전자 내부 사정에 밝은 한 관계자는 “최근 밀려드는 파운드리 수주물량보다 생산되는 물량이 적어 납기에 애를 먹고 있다는 점에서 확보됐다던 비메모리 최첨단 공정 수율에 의구심을 갖는 것이 사실”이라고
Kind of old news with the audit that started up in early 22 or late 21 (as if anyone saying their yields were “perfect” wasn’t always suspect). My comments about ridiculous fangirling is no matter how well or poorly N3 and 3GAE are doing; any claim that yields are x or y% can safely be viewed as nothing but hogwash. As I’ve stated before a % is worthless unless you have information about the die being fabbed and what kind of yield we are talking about. Even then yield doesn’t necessarily tell you anything about process health.
As an example it is obvious to see that 4LPE is either having or had issues. But any claim that yields are only 30% is nonsense to me. For one it is hard to believe that a “released node” could have DDs that bad. Two the main issue with 4LPE seems to be that parametric yields (the contacts don’t inspire confidence either).
Any attempts by Taiwanese media to pump up TSMC and degrade SS with claims that are not based on any technical facts are just as pathetic to me.
[인포스탁데일리=이동희 기자] 삼성전자가 삼성반도체 파운드리 최첨단 수율 허위보고 문제에 이어 수율확보를 이유로 집행된 자금의 행방에 대해서도 확대 조사할 방침인 것으로 알려졌다.21일 인포스탁데일리 취재에 따르면 최근 진행된 삼성전자 DS부문에 대한 경영진단은 비메모리 3나노와 4나노에 이어 5나노 확보수율도 함께 들여다보고 있다.삼성전자 내부 사정에 밝은 한 관계자는 “최근 밀려드는 파운드리 수주물량보다 생산되는 물량이 적어 납기에 애를 먹고 있다는 점에서 확보됐다던 비메모리 최첨단 공정 수율에 의구심을 갖는 것이 사실”이라고
Press releases are not journalism. Every company - and university - has a cheerleading section, and the internet has sucked the funding out of journalism so pressos fill a vacuum. It can be depressing. Semiwiki is one of the places where we can get real insights.
Kind of old news with the audit that started up in early 22 or late 21 (as if anyone saying their yields were “perfect” wasn’t always suspect). My comments about ridiculous fangirling is no matter how well or poorly N3 and 3GAE are doing; any claim that yields are x or y% can safely be viewed as nothing but hogwash. As I’ve stated before a % is worthless unless you have information about the die being fabbed and what kind of yield we are talking about. Even then yield doesn’t necessarily tell you anything about process health.
As an example it is obvious to see that 4LPE is either having or had issues. But any claim that yields are only 30% is nonsense to me. For one it is hard to believe that a “released node” could have DDs that bad. Two the main issue with 4LPE seems to be that parametric yields (the contacts don’t inspire confidence either).
Any attempts by Taiwanese media to pump up TSMC and degrade SS with claims that are not based on any technical facts are just as pathetic to me.
If anything I find Taiwanese media puts out TSMC FUD even more. I’m looking at you trends force, digitimes. According to them the sky is always falling over at TSMC…
If anything I find Taiwanese media puts out TSMC FUD even more. I’m looking at you trends force, digitimes. According to them the sky is always falling over at TSMC…
Ah yes the perpetual motion machine of sh*tty journalism. One puts out a poorly sourced article and then the rest all start quoting each other giving the impression of an a actual piece of journalism. I see we have seemed to have reached a self sustaining critical mass
Ah yes the perpetual motion machine of sh*tty journalism. One puts out a poorly sourced article and then the rest all start quoting each other giving the impression of an a actual piece of journalism. I see we have seemed to have reached a self sustaining critical mass
www.infostockdaily.co.kr
