You are currently viewing SemiWiki as a guest which gives you limited access to the site. To view blog comments and experience other SemiWiki features you must be a registered member. Registration is fast, simple, and absolutely free so please, join our community today!
Definitely worth looking into. Even better would be to optimize the software and require less hardware. Throwing big iron at a problem has always been a knee jerk reaction.
Way back when I saw dueling keynotes Bill Gates and Andy Grove at a consumer electronics conference in Las Vegas. Maybe the precursor to CES. Bill Gates said hardware would always be the compute limitation. Andy Grove said software will be the limitation. Both were right of course.
Regarding the power issue of AI, this is what is happening the coming 5 years, off grid if you can.
Very nice overview article in NYT of all that is happening now with the new AI data centres being constructed all over the US.
Has a great image of the new INTEL construction site in OHIO and all the datacentres around it that are being developed.
...................................................................................................
Industry analysts and executives also question whether power plants built alongside data centers will remain competitive if it becomes easier to connect to the grid.
Siemens Energy makes some of the equipment that the New Albany power plants plan to use. But even that company’s chief executive, Christian Bruch, is skeptical about using smaller machines as permanent power sources.
“These will not be long-term installations,” Mr. Bruch said in a recent interview, discussing the broader trend. “Is it good in terms of efficiency? And is that a smart power supply solution? Absolutely not.”
Old satellites are recycled by burning them up via Earths atmosphere; a short deorbit burn
Satellites also naturally lose orbit - though how long it takes depends on the height of the orbit. (Can be weeks to hundreds of years or more depending).
Definitely worth looking into. Even better would be to optimize the software and require less hardware. Throwing big iron at a problem has always been a knee jerk reaction.
Way back when I saw dueling keynotes Bill Gates and Andy Grove at a consumer electronics conference in Las Vegas. Maybe the precursor to CES. Bill Gates said hardware would always be the compute limitation. Andy Grove said software will be the limitation. Both were right of course.
Old satellites are recycled by burning them up via Earths atmosphere; a short deorbit burn
Satellites also naturally lose orbit - though how long it takes depends on the height of the orbit. (Can be weeks to hundreds of years or more depending).
Data centers don't just throw away old hardware,they sell them to server recyclers. They can recover a lot money from second hand components especially DRAM
But if they just burn the whole thing down at atmosphere,it will be expensive
I think the justification around data centers in space probably has less to do with cost (It's going to be way more expensive) than it does to do with jursidiction. In space you can do (almost) whatever you want without pesky governments stopping you - that's what makes it attractive to someone like Musk.
Data centers don't just throw away old hardware,they sell them to server recyclers. They can recover a lot money from second hand components especially DRAM
But if they just burn the whole thing down at atmosphere,it will be expensive
Agreed -- though the space data centers are likely to have a longer cycle life than what's on Earth. They'll be swarms of satellites initially (re-purposed Starlink v3 or v4's) - each with their own power supply (battery and solar). So most likely they'll want to use them for several years, even if 'better' stuff is available - because deorbiting the full stack and bringing to Earth for recycling is probably more expensive than launching it in the first place (with today's technology).
I think the justification around data centers in space probably has less to do with cost (It's going to be way more expensive) than it does to do with jursidiction. In space you can do (almost) whatever you want without pesky governments stopping you - that's what makes it attractive to someone like Musk.
OT - side benefit is it keeps land property and local energy prices down -- as building data centers make those things more costly for.. everyone else.