Array
(
    [content] => 
    [params] => Array
        (
            [0] => /forum/threads/intel-to-repurchase-49-equity-interest-in-ireland-fab-joint-venture.24868/
        )

    [addOns] => Array
        (
            [DL6/MLTP] => 13
            [Hampel/TimeZoneDebug] => 1000070
            [SV/ChangePostDate] => 2010200
            [SemiWiki/Newsletter] => 1000010
            [SemiWiki/WPMenu] => 1000010
            [SemiWiki/XPressExtend] => 1000010
            [ThemeHouse/XLink] => 1000970
            [ThemeHouse/XPress] => 1010570
            [XF] => 2031070
            [XFI] => 1060170
        )

    [wordpress] => /var/www/html
)

Intel to Repurchase 49% Equity Interest in Ireland Fab Joint Venture

Daniel Nenni

Founder
Staff member
Apr 1, 2026 • 9:00 AM EDT

SANTA CLARA, Calif. & NEW YORK--(BUSINESS WIRE)-- Intel Corporation (Nasdaq: INTC) and Apollo (NYSE: APO) today announced a definitive agreement for Intel to repurchase the 49% equity interest in the joint venture related to Intel’s Fab 34 in Ireland not held by Intel for $14.2 billion. The agreement reflects Intel’s continued business momentum underpinned by the growing and essential role CPUs play in the era of AI, a significantly strengthened balance sheet and the strong partnership between Intel and Apollo.

In 2024, Apollo-managed funds and affiliates led an $11.2 billion investment to acquire a 49% equity interest in a joint venture entity related to Fab 34, providing Intel with equity-like capital while preserving balance sheet strength. This transaction provided Intel with significant financial flexibility and enabled the company to unlock and redeploy capital to advance its strategic priorities including accelerating the buildout of Intel 4 and Intel 3, the most advanced processes manufactured in Europe, and of Intel 18A, the most advanced process developed and manufactured in the U.S. today.

“We thank Apollo for their ongoing partnership on our journey to build a world-class wafer fabrication and advanced packaging foundry anchored in trust, consistency, and execution,” said David Zinsner, Intel CFO. “Our 2024 agreement was the right structure at the right time and provided Intel with meaningful flexibility, enabling us to accelerate critical initiatives. Today, we have a stronger balance sheet, improved financial discipline and an evolved business strategy. We appreciate Apollo’s continued collaboration to reach this outcome as we realign our capital structure with our long-term strategy.”

“Our partnership with Intel began at an important stage in the execution of its advanced manufacturing roadmap, where our long-term strategic capital played a meaningful role in accelerating the production of next-generation chip technology,” said Apollo Partner Jamshid Ehsani. “Flexibility and alignment are core to how we approach relationships as a long-term, solutions-oriented capital partner, and we are pleased to facilitate this transaction in support of Intel’s evolving strategic and operational priorities. This mutually beneficial transaction is a testament to how we operate: client-driven and focused on long-term partnership. We’re proud to support Intel’s evolving strategic and operational priorities and look forward to pursuing additional opportunities to work together over time.”

The repurchase of the 49% JV stake is expected to be funded through cash on hand and proceeds from the issuance of new debt of approximately $6.5 billion. The transaction is expected to be accretive to ongoing EPS while strengthening Intel’s credit profile in 2027 and beyond. Intel continues to expect it will retire debt maturities as they come due in 2026 and 2027.

Ireland and Fab 34 remain central to Intel’s global manufacturing footprint and current and future product roadmap. Fab 34 is a high-volume semiconductor fabrication facility for products utilizing the Intel 4 and Intel 3 process technologies, including Intel Core Ultra and Intel Xeon 6 processors. Intel continues to make significant capital investments in its Ireland campus to expand manufacturing capacity, strengthen execution, and deliver for customers building next-generation AI-enabled systems.

Advisors

Goldman Sachs & Co. acted as exclusive financial advisor to Intel, Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP served as legal counsel and Eversheds Sutherland and PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP served as tax and accounting advisors. Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP served as legal counsel to affiliates of Apollo. Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC acted as exclusive financial advisor and Kirkland & Ellis LLP served as special legal counsel to the seller's independent board.

Forward-Looking Statements

This release contains forward-looking statements regarding Intel’s expectations with respect to the agreement with Apollo, including the timing and funding of the repurchase of Apollo’s JV stake, the issuance of new debt, the impact of the repurchase on Intel’s EPS and credit profile and the retirement of debt. Such statements involve many risks and uncertainties that could cause Intel’s actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied, including those associated with: uncertainties as to the timing of the consummation of the transaction and Intel’s ability to secure financing for the transaction; global economic conditions, including with respect to corporate debt markets; changes in semiconductor product demand and margins; and other risks and uncertainties described in this release and Intel’s 2025 Form 10-K and other filings with the SEC. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date they were first made. Intel does not undertake, and expressly disclaims any duty, to update such statements, whether as a result of new information, new developments, or otherwise, except to the extent that disclosure may be required by law.

About Intel

Intel (Nasdaq: INTC) designs and manufactures advanced semiconductors that connect and power the modern world. Every day, our engineers create new technologies that enhance and shape the future of computing to enable new possibilities for every customer we serve. Learn more at intel.com.

© Intel Corporation. Intel, the Intel logo, and other Intel marks are trademarks of Intel Corporation or its subsidiaries. Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others.

About Apollo

Apollo is a high-growth, global alternative asset manager. In our asset management business, we seek to provide our clients excess return at every point along the risk-reward spectrum from investment grade credit to private equity. For more than three decades, our investing expertise across our fully integrated platform has served the financial return needs of our clients and provided businesses with innovative capital solutions for growth. Through Athene, our retirement services business, we specialize in helping clients achieve financial security by providing a suite of retirement savings products and acting as a solutions provider to institutions. Our patient, creative, and knowledgeable approach to investing aligns our clients, businesses we invest in, our employees, and the communities we impact, to expand opportunity and achieve positive outcomes. As of December 31, 2025, Apollo had approximately $938 billion of assets under management. To learn more, please visit www.apollo.com.

View source version on businesswire.com: https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20260401857800/en/

Intel Contacts
Investor Relations
investor.relations@intel.com

Sophie Metzger
Media Relations
sophie.metzger@intel.com

Apollo Contacts
Noah Gunn
Global Head of Investor Relations
(212) 822-0540
IR@apollo.com

Joanna Rose
Global Head of Corporate Communications
(212) 822-0491
communications@apollo.com

Source: Intel Corporation

Released Apr 1, 2026 • 9:00 AM EDT
 
Apollo Made $3B in two years but intel got all the rights back and they don't have to share profit anymore and they scale the production however they want without having to pay penalties so i guess that's good.
This is good as the terms of the agreement were very punishing if milestones were not met (they were not met).

Intel now does not have regulations over how to use it.

Using other peoples money to fund IFS growth was a core of Pats plan.... Since intel is not growing, It now is being fixed but it will cost. I will be interested in the debt service on the new loan.

Brookfield deal has similar issues but Intel would need to buy out the JV which owns the property. Fab 52/62 has 21B in investment combined.

Intel now does not have to share the billions in profit that IFS makes from Fab 34 (April Fool).
 
This is good as the terms of the agreement were very punishing if milestones were not met (they were not met).

Intel now does not have regulations over how to use it.

Using other peoples money to fund IFS growth was a core of Pats plan.... Since intel is not growing, It now is being fixed but it will cost. I will be interested in the debt service on the new loan.

Brookfield deal has similar issues but Intel would need to buy out the JV which owns the property. Fab 52/62 has 21B in investment combined.

Intel now does not have to share the billions in profit that IFS makes from Fab 34 (April Fool).

Does this point to a fab spinout?
 
This is good as the terms of the agreement were very punishing if milestones were not met (they were not met).
I remember they paid like $700 million or so one time when the milestones were not me
Intel now does not have regulations over how to use it.

Using other peoples money to fund IFS growth was a core of Pats plan.... Since intel is not growing, It now is being fixed but it will cost. I will be interested in the debt service on the new loan.
I always thought it was a mix on Zinser/Pat idea
Brookfield deal has similar issues but Intel would need to buy out the JV which owns the property. Fab 52/62 has 21B in investment combined.
Intel now does not have to share the billions in profit that IFS makes from Fab 34 (April Fool).
I remember the investment being $30 Billion Total and brook field giving 49% of it
 
This is good as the terms of the agreement were very punishing if milestones were not met (they were not met).

Intel now does not have regulations over how to use it.

Using other peoples money to fund IFS growth was a core of Pats plan.... Since intel is not growing, It now is being fixed but it will cost. I will be interested in the debt service on the new loan.

Brookfield deal has similar issues but Intel would need to buy out the JV which owns the property. Fab 52/62 has 21B in investment combined.

Intel now does not have to share the billions in profit that IFS makes from Fab 34 (April Fool).
The highlight of this "smart capital" was Intel changing their mind on Ireland capex timing shortly after signing off on the Apollo deal. This change of heart resulted in Intel taking a $750M charge in just 6 months(!) after the deal was signed on the expected damages that would need to be paid to Apollo starting in 2026.
 
Does this point to a fab spinout?
It helps allow intel to make the decision. But the fundamentals have not changed from what DZ said a while ago. "IFS is not investable at this time".

At this point the spin off plan would be (and I have seen this with disasters in the past).

Write everything down .... Intel takes the loss. Intel artificially improved P&L with depreciation change so a write down will cause a potential liability/fraud issue.
Intel says what to close and what to keep open.
Intel signs agreement with penalties on purchases for next 10 years.

Then it can be sold..... a JV would be best with customers and USG.

Just an opinion
 
I remember they paid like $700 million or so one time when the milestones were not me

I always thought it was a mix on Zinser/Pat idea
It was mostly Pat. DZ is a good soldier. It would work if the ramp ever came but it did not.
I remember the investment being $30 Billion Total and brook field giving 49% of
We need to make sure we look at actuals vs plans and models. the amount of spending is legally documented in 10Q. total was about 10B brookfield, 10B Intel total to date last quarter (correct me if I am wrong). that is for one not fully tooled out fab (52) and a shell (62).

If the fab doesnt ramp as planned, Intel starts paying interest essentially. Brookfield cannot lose money on the deal
 
What makes you think that Fab 34 economics are subpar? The ramp was rocky, but I thought they stabilized their operations. The demand for Ireland's output should be strong.
It was not fully ramped last time I checked (December). According to IFS metrics (sell at market price to business unit), it was not profitable in our model. Intel has been sticking with the commentary that Intel 7 has higher margins than INtel 3, 4, 18A currently.

Let me know if you have different model on why you think Fab 34 is net positive on margins. We can discuss details

Side note: Intel is doing some complex stuff with Intel 3 on Clearwater forest. I have no idea how that will pan out financially.

If there is a material change in Intel IFS losses in this months report out, I will redo the model.
 
It was not fully ramped last time I checked (December). According to IFS metrics (sell at market price to business unit), it was not profitable in our model. Intel has been sticking with the commentary that Intel 7 has higher margins than INtel 3, 4, 18A currently.

Let me know if you have different model on why you think Fab 34 is net positive on margins. We can discuss details
The only reason i can think of is the Demand for Server CPUs
Side note: Intel is doing some complex stuff with Intel 3 on Clearwater forest. I have no idea how that will pan out financially.
that stuff is gonna continue with Diamond Rapids
 
Back
Top