Intel Reports Third-Quarter 2025 Financial Results

[Daniel Nenni]

Intel reported better-than-expected financial results for the third quarter of 2025, signaling progress in its ongoing turnaround. Revenue reached $13.7 billion, exceeding analyst expectations of roughly $13.1 billion and marking a modest 3% year-over-year increase. Adjusted earnings came in at $0.23 per share, significantly above the consensus forecast of about $0.02, reflecting stronger operational execution and cost discipline.

Intel’s gains were driven by improving demand across its client computing and data center segments, along with early contributions from its AI-focused products. The company also benefited from restructuring efforts aimed at streamlining operations and cutting expenses. However, Intel maintained a cautious tone for the remainder of the year, guiding fourth-quarter revenue between $12.8 billion and $13.8 billion.

Gross margins showed gradual improvement, though they remain below historical norms as Intel continues heavy investments in its foundry business and advanced process technologies. Investors responded positively to the earnings beat, with shares rising about 8% after the announcement. The results suggest Intel’s multi-year turnaround plan is beginning to show traction.

"Our Q3 results reflect improved execution and steady progress against our strategic priorities,” said Lip-Bu Tan, Intel CEO. “AI is accelerating demand for compute and creating attractive opportunities across our portfolio, including our core x86 platforms, new efforts in purpose-built ASICs and accelerators, and foundry services. Intel’s industry-leading CPUs and ecosystem, along with our unique U.S.-based leading-edge logic manufacturing and R&D, position us well to capitalize on these trends over time.”

“We took meaningful steps this quarter to strengthen our balance sheet, including accelerated funding from the U.S. Government and investments by NVIDIA and SoftBank Group that increase our operational flexibility and demonstrate the critical role we play in the ecosystem,” said David Zinsner, Intel CFO. “Our stronger than expected Q3 results mark our fourth consecutive quarter of improved execution and reflect the underlying strength of our core markets. Current demand is outpacing supply, a trend we expect will persist into 2026.”

Intel Reports Third-Quarter 2025 Financial Results

www.intc.com

 

[MKWVentures]

Some interesting comments on 18A and when it becomes competitive.

No one has asked the question I recommended "is 18A ramp helping or hurting margins in 2026?" DZ answered it anyway.

Luckily the majority of Intel revenue comes from 10 and 7 (and TSMC).

 

[tomatoma]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1981478604786847834

Intel is losing

 

[Xebec]

Intel is losing

This isn't very optimistic for 18A short term - they're saying that yields will only be "good margin" in 2027, with a small chance at the end of 2026.

It's definitely a signal (to me at least), that N2 yields will be ahead of Intel 18A in 2H 2026.

I'm personally curious - is it the GAAFET, BSPD, or something else causing a slower than expected ramp.

(Note - I'm assuming this quote is from Intel at the investor call today).

 

[samwilde]

My guess is firing all those people is taking its toll. A lot of projects might be delayed. Some were cancelled.

 

[floppydisk]

Stacy Rasgon: Dave, I wanna follow-up on two things on 18A. I thought I heard you say, number one, that yields would not be in a great place at least until the end of next year. And then I thought I also heard you say that you were not gonna be adding a lot of 18A capacity next year. Did I hear those wrong?

Dave Zinsner's Answer: On 18A, we're still at our infancy. And what I'm saying is relative to the CapEx plan, it's not like we're gonna incrementally add supply for 18A next year. But yes, of course, we're going to be ramping the volume over the course of next year. I wouldn't say 18A yields are in a bad place. I mean, they're where we want them to be at this point. We had a goal for the end of the year, and they're gonna hit that goal. But to be fully accretive in terms of the cost structure of 18A, we need the yields to be better. That's like every process. That's what happens, and it's going to take all of next year, I think, to really get to a place where that's the case.

 

[Daniel Nenni]

https://finance.yahoo.com/quote/INTC/earnings/INTC-Q3-2025-earnings_call-366977.html

Yahoo.........

 

[Brady]

Three thoughts on 18A:

1. These yield and margin comments are basically what folks here have been saying; it’s good enough to ship products, but not good enough to rapidly move products onto it without enormous margin issues.
2. This isn’t news; they’re saying the CapEx plan and volume ramp for 18A is going to plan. There’s no better nor worse news here.
3. Intel Foundry is still no TSMC; N2 will ramp in huge volume with good margins from the start in 2H26 and 18A will be no competition for it.

There’s a long road ahead for Foundry, and I await further news on 18AP and customer wafer agreements. No news on the reported MSFT Maia 3 deal…

 

[tooLongInEDA]

Right, so taking this at face value (it's directly from Intel), the key questions that occur to me are:

1. How does this 18A yield ramp compare to the ramp on the nearest equivalent TSMC process ?
2. Do we expect the 2nm yield ramp to be significantly faster than that for 18A ? If so, why and with what confidence level.

My sense is that the 18A yield ramp is slow (and slower than TSMC). But I could be wrong, so I'd like to hear from someone who knows what they're talking about here.

 

[MKWVentures]

https://finance.yahoo.com/quote/INTC/earnings/INTC-Q3-2025-earnings_call-366977.html

Yahoo.........

View attachment 3786

AI/ChatGPT is helping so much. I like it when it gets years wrong on events and pretends past events are upcoming

 

[MKWVentures]

Three thoughts on 18A:

1. These yield and margin comments are basically what folks here have been saying; it’s good enough to ship products, but not good enough to rapidly move products onto it without enormous margin issues.
2. This isn’t news; they’re saying the CapEx plan and volume ramp for 18A is going to plan. There’s no better nor worse news here.
3. Intel Foundry is still no TSMC; N2 will ramp in huge volume with good margins from the start in 2H26 and 18A will be no competition for it.

There’s a long road ahead for Foundry, and I await further news on 18AP and customer wafer agreements. No news on the reported MSFT Maia 3 deal…

exactly

And Intels most successful and profitable products are 10 and 7. And Intel mentioned the effect of 18A on Intels Margins..... (I am pretty sure DZ is getting beat up this morning).

LBT: "What part of 'Shut the &$#% Up' didnt you understand???"
DZ: "Next time I will just say 'we are happy with the progress on 18A and 14A is going to be spec-tacular'"

18A is technically a very advanced and good process. the Finances are not good due to low volume and high cost (the "Intel problem"). The volumes in 2026 and even 2027 are low.

 

[Erik F]

is it just me or Zisner souded nervous?

 

[Artificer60]

Right, so taking this at face value (it's directly from Intel), the key questions that occur to me are:

1. How does this 18A yield ramp compare to the ramp on the nearest equivalent TSMC process ?
2. Do we expect the 2nm yield ramp to be significantly faster than that for 18A ? If so, why and with what confidence level.

My sense is that the 18A yield ramp is slow (and slower than TSMC). But I could be wrong, so I'd like to hear from someone who knows what they're talking about here.

I probably don't qualify as someone who knows what they are talking about, but I'll share my impression anyway.

I suspect that Intel's yield ramp is quite a bit slower than TSMC. And I believe that is a byproduct of their previous business model. When you are going to hit peak output in 3-4 years and shut the process down within 5-7 years you want to get the product out the door as soon as it is good enough to make money. That's what Intel has done for decades. And I think that issue is reflected in the 18A PDK where Intel's PDKs weren't as mature as TSMCs for a given milepost (0.5, 1.0). Intel was willing to accept the additional churn of process changes because being first to market was so important.

TSMC's business model (and Intel foundry going forward) requires them to have far process stability when they start running client silicon. So they have developed a different approach to get yield up and stabilize the process as quickly as possible. Intel is learning how to do that and 18A is the first real process they have to learn from. So I'm not surprised there are more than a few bumps in the road. 14A will be our first chance to see if Intel has learned those lessons and it isn't as far away as you might think. To the best of my knowledge PDK 05. is due out somewhere in the Dec'25 - Jan'26 time frame. If Intel has learned from 18A it should be locked down much more than 18A was.

 

[siliconbruh999]

18A is technically a very advanced and good process. the Finances are not good due to low volume and high cost (the "Intel problem"). The volumes in 2026 and even 2027 are low.

which is not true Intel finances are in part due to Outsourcing as well they don't have any products on their own node part of improvement in DC margin is due to GNR being good and is on a Intel Node can't say that about their offering in client as everything except packing is outsourced.

And Intels most successful and profitable products are 10 and 7. And Intel mentioned the effect of 18A on Intels Margins..... (I am pretty sure DZ is getting beat up this morning).

It's a 2019 Node at this point of time so it's not really unexpected but it kills their margin on foundry side cause it being too poor in terms of cost

 

[Daniel Nenni]

18A is technically a very advanced and good process. the Finances are not good due to low volume and high cost (the "Intel problem"). The volumes in 2026 and even 2027 are low.

This is not just an Intel problem, it is a foundry problem for fabs that do not have the volumes TSMC does. Samsung has been plagued with yield ramp problems ever since 14nm.

 

[MKWVentures]

which is not true Intel finances are in part due to Outsourcing as well they don't have any products on their own node part of improvement in DC margin is due to GNR being good and is on a Intel Node can't say that about their offering in client as everything except packing is outsourced.

It's a 2019 Node at this point of time so it's not really unexpected but it kills their margin on foundry side cause it being too poor in terms of cost

I think you need to re-read the transcript. Corporate margins increased with increasing outsourcing this quarter 10 and 7 have the highest margins.

18A is a headwind on margins in 2026 per Intel. If IFS charged a high price for 18A, then IFS margins will be higher but product group margins are lower due to yield.

Reminder Most Intel Volume is 10 and 7. What percentage of Intel DC sales do you think are GR/SF in Q3

 

[Daniel Nenni]

is it just me or Zisner souded nervous?

That was not his best call.

 

[siliconbruh999]

I think you need to re-read the transcript. Corporate margins increased with increasing outsourcing this quarter 10 and 7 have the highest margins.

They also raised price on Intel 7/10 CPUs

18A is a headwind on margins in 2026 per Intel. If IFS charged a high price for 18A, then IFS margins will be higher but product group margins are lower due to yield.

What IFS charges Intel Products can be made up it's basically having a cheat code and you can distribute it any way you like. I can make Foundry look profitable and Product look bad

Reminder Most Intel Volume is 10 and 7. What percentage of Intel DC sales do you think are GR/SF in Q3

I don't have the data for Q3 it's not out yet but they have increased their GNR/SRF Shipment nowhere close to Intel 7/10nm capacity. Here is the data for Q1.
14% of the CPUs were GNR/SRF

 

[dkr1986]

No one has asked the question I recommended "is 18A ramp helping or hurting margins in 2026?" DZ answered it anyway.

NGL, I was taken aback by the comment that 18A will not be margin accretive until end of 2026! I now think he was talking about the Intel parent company as he later in the call said Intel Foundry margins will improve meaningfully in 2026 (I mean they are negative GM now). Only question now is can they drive up the ASP for their 18A products in the marketplace. I do think it is possible especially with a strong Win10 EOS refresh.

I also realized recent TSMC ER commentary that N2 is margin dilutive in 2026 and N3 is only now catching up to corporate average margin in 2026 even with the wafer volume they drive in their fabs. So, I don't think this is anything unique to Intel or 18A. I as an INTC shareholder may have had optimistic projections for 2026. Instead of mid 2026 tailwind, it moves to end of 2026. That shift in timeframe shouldn't matter for an investor with long term mindset.

 

[MKWVentures]

They also raised price on Intel 7/10 CPUs

What IFS charges Intel Products can be made up it's basically having a cheat code and you can distribute it any way you like. I can make Foundry look profitable and Product look bad

I don't have the data for Q3 it's not out yet but they have increased their GNR/SRF Shipment nowhere close to Intel 7/10nm capacity. Here is the data for Q1.
14% of the CPUs were GNR/SRF
View attachment 3791

OUTSTANDING DATA! THANKS. I just had the commentary. I think SF is a little optimistic from my sources but its close enough

Do you have Client????