
Intel Names Jaguar Shores as its Next-generation AI Chip
Intel has put the name of a brand new AI chip on its roadmap that will compete with offerings from AMD and Nvidia. The Jaguar Shores AI chip is listed […]

Array ( [content] => [params] => Array ( [0] => /forum/threads/intel-names-jaguar-shores-as-its-next-generation-ai-chip.21509/ ) [addOns] => Array ( [DL6/MLTP] => 13 [Hampel/TimeZoneDebug] => 1000070 [SV/ChangePostDate] => 2010200 [SemiWiki/Newsletter] => 1000010 [SemiWiki/WPMenu] => 1000010 [SemiWiki/XPressExtend] => 1000010 [ThemeHouse/XLink] => 1000970 [ThemeHouse/XPress] => 1010570 [XF] => 2021770 [XFI] => 1050270 ) [wordpress] => /var/www/html )
Share the same feeling.I am glad intel delivered on a name for its next AI chip. that was a major milestone. The powerpoint slide is complete. What will Gaudi3 revenue be in 2025?
Many fierce animals have been used in names like Tiger Lake, Lion Cove, Panther Lake, and now Jaguar Shores.These names come from where?
Intel loves using place names for their chips, kind of like a tradition. We've seen names like "Cascade Lake" or "Emerald Rapids" before, so it makes sense they’d go with something like this for their next-gen AI chip.These names come from where?
While it may be considered tradition by now, I believe there is a strong legal reason for this as well. If I remember correctly geographic places cannot be trademarked, hence no unexpected legal costs for mistakenly using protected brandingIntel loves using place names for their chips, kind of like a tradition. We've seen names like "Cascade Lake" or "Emerald Rapids" before, so it makes sense they’d go with something like this for their next-gen AI chip.
While it may be considered tradition by now, I believe there is a strong legal reason for this as well. If I remember correctly geographic places cannot be trademarked, hence no unexpected legal costs for mistakenly using protected branding
Someone else can use the same branding thanWhile it may be considered tradition by now, I believe there is a strong legal reason for this as well. If I remember correctly geographic places cannot be trademarked, hence no unexpected legal costs for mistakenly using protected branding