siliconbruh999
Well-known member
Is Glenn Hinton still Working at Intel ?
Array
(
[content] =>
[params] => Array
(
[0] => /forum/threads/intel-names-%E2%80%98long-term%E2%80%99-successor-to-its-technology-development-chief-and-top-oregon-executive.21310/page-2
)
[addOns] => Array
(
[DL6/MLTP] => 13
[Hampel/TimeZoneDebug] => 1000070
[SV/ChangePostDate] => 2010200
[SemiWiki/Newsletter] => 1000010
[SemiWiki/WPMenu] => 1000010
[SemiWiki/XPressExtend] => 1000010
[ThemeHouse/XLink] => 1000970
[ThemeHouse/XPress] => 1010570
[XF] => 2030770
[XFI] => 1060170
)
[wordpress] => /var/www/html
)
Guests have limited access.
Join our community today!
Join our community today!
You are currently viewing SemiWiki as a guest which gives you limited access to the site. To view blog comments and experience other SemiWiki features you must be a registered member. Registration is fast, simple, and absolutely free so please, join our community today!
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Intel names ‘long-term’ successor to its technology development chief and top Oregon executive
- Thread starter XYang2023
- Start date
What is true? The part where a ‘ long term’ successor was named or Dr. Ann was leaving or firedUgh. I just heard from an insider it is true.
That a "long-term successor" was named.What is true? The part where a ‘ long term’ successor was named or Dr. Ann was leaving or fired
Yes. He retired prior to Gelsinger's return, and then Gelsinger successfully asked him to un-retire.Is Glenn Hinton still Working at Intel ?
I think it is really interesting that Intel chose to announce this. (even if it was just announced internally -- Intel had to know it would leak)
Why would they do this ? It seems like there would be no upside as Intel is at a key point for bringing in foundry customers. Stability would be important.
I wonder if it is related to 18A ? That is the technology that Pat G said they are betting the company on. (I forget his precise wording.)
Or it could be related to something personal. Or maybe pushed by the BOD for some reason?
Why would they do this ? It seems like there would be no upside as Intel is at a key point for bringing in foundry customers. Stability would be important.
I wonder if it is related to 18A ? That is the technology that Pat G said they are betting the company on. (I forget his precise wording.)
Or it could be related to something personal. Or maybe pushed by the BOD for some reason?