You are currently viewing SemiWiki as a guest which gives you limited access to the site. To view blog comments and experience other SemiWiki features you must be a registered member. Registration is fast, simple, and absolutely free so please, join our community today!
I agree. I just don’t like it when someone duplicates Intel’s entire 35-minute content onto their own YouTube channel and encourages everyone to watch it, even though the same Intel/Citi audio is freely available on the official site. This duplication is essentially piracy. Regardless of the tool used to copy it, this practice is harmful to the academic environment, society, and the semiconductor industry.
This is not a duplicate; it's my personal note—similar to how you duplicated a source to Notebook LM and create derivative materials. My purpose is to better understand the content, including transcription and enhancing the audio. Also, on this site, I’ve never copied an entire article—I always use links.
At the moment, I’m studying the latest conference using this approach:
This is not a duplicate; it's my personal note—similar to how you duplicated a source to Notebook LM and create derivative materials. My purpose is to better understand the content, including transcription and enhancing the audio. Also, on this site, I’ve never copied an entire article—I always use links.
At the moment, I’m studying the latest conference using this approach:
Please keep your copy of the identical Intel audio to yourself. You may analyze or parse it for your own personal learning, but do not share the original audio publicly. This audio belongs to Intel and Citi Bank.
Violating piracy is wrong and amounts to theft. In the worst case, a person could even be expelled from school or lose his job.
Please keep your copy of the identical Intel audio to yourself. You may analyze or parse it for your own personal learning, but do not share the original audio publicly. This audio belongs to Intel and Citi Bank.
Violating piracy is wrong and amounts to theft. In the worst case, a person could even be expelled from school or lose his job.
Yes, but that doesn’t give anyone a license to steal. If you choose to disregard intellectual property, that is your own decision, but please don’t glorify it.
Yes, but that doesn’t give anyone a license to steal. If you choose to disregard intellectual property, that is your own decision, but please don’t glorify it.
IT would have been better for Intel if they were a partner for rapidus they would get the advantage of cheaper than US and better subsidies than US not to mention customer exposure due to government forcing them.
You really don't get it, do you ? This is getting extremely tiresome.
By all means do your own "note taking" for your own use.
If you want to add some commentary around Intel, then do some original work of your own and add value. Like most of us manage to do on here (and which should not be considered a forum for self-promotion and advertising).
As it is, this is just unprofessional and unethical IMHO.
You really don't get it, do you ? This is getting extremely tiresome.
By all means do your own "note taking" for your own use.
If you want to add some commentary around Intel, then do some original work of your own and add value. Like most of us manage to do on here (and which should not be considered a forum for self-promotion and advertising).
As it is, this is just unprofessional and unethical IMHO.
Are you an Intel shareholder? If not, what value are you adding by constantly posting biased opinions (I know you support TSM)?
Yesterday, I contacted someone I know at Intel to check if the IR team can help. I’m not gaining any personal benefit from this, apart from knowing that people need better access to accurate information. Otherwise, people like you just keep spreading opinionated claims, and it becomes difficult for others to find proper references.
Hist kept implying that Intel would increase outsourcing to TSMC, but from the GS conference yesterday, it’s clear that this is not the case. For IFS to reach breakeven, they NEED to significantly ramp up 18A.
The people supporting that post are not only non-native English speakers from Europe, Japan, Korea, China, etc., but also proficient English speakers, including a reporter from a popular site.
