Array
(
    [content] => 
    [params] => Array
        (
            [0] => /forum/threads/intel-may-sell-part-of-intel-foundry-in-the-future-intel-at-citi-2025-global-tmt-conference.23553/page-4
        )

    [addOns] => Array
        (
            [DL6/MLTP] => 13
            [Hampel/TimeZoneDebug] => 1000070
            [SV/ChangePostDate] => 2010200
            [SemiWiki/Newsletter] => 1000010
            [SemiWiki/WPMenu] => 1000010
            [SemiWiki/XPressExtend] => 1000010
            [ThemeHouse/XLink] => 1000970
            [ThemeHouse/XPress] => 1010570
            [XF] => 2021770
            [XFI] => 1050270
        )

    [wordpress] => /var/www/html
)

Intel may sell part of Intel Foundry in the future - Intel at Citi 2025 Global TMT Conference

I agree. I just don’t like it when someone duplicates Intel’s entire 35-minute content onto their own YouTube channel and encourages everyone to watch it, even though the same Intel/Citi audio is freely available on the official site. This duplication is essentially piracy. Regardless of the tool used to copy it, this practice is harmful to the academic environment, society, and the semiconductor industry.
This is not a duplicate; it's my personal note—similar to how you duplicated a source to Notebook LM and create derivative materials. My purpose is to better understand the content, including transcription and enhancing the audio. Also, on this site, I’ve never copied an entire article—I always use links.

At the moment, I’m studying the latest conference using this approach:

Screenshot 2025-09-09 115427_resized.png
 
This is not a duplicate; it's my personal note—similar to how you duplicated a source to Notebook LM and create derivative materials. My purpose is to better understand the content, including transcription and enhancing the audio. Also, on this site, I’ve never copied an entire article—I always use links.

At the moment, I’m studying the latest conference using this approach:

View attachment 3630

Please keep your copy of the identical Intel audio to yourself. You may analyze or parse it for your own personal learning, but do not share the original audio publicly. This audio belongs to Intel and Citi Bank.

Violating piracy is wrong and amounts to theft. In the worst case, a person could even be expelled from school or lose his job.
 
Please keep your copy of the identical Intel audio to yourself. You may analyze or parse it for your own personal learning, but do not share the original audio publicly. This audio belongs to Intel and Citi Bank.

Violating piracy is wrong and amounts to theft. In the worst case, a person could even be expelled from school or lose his job.
See my post. Intel has the duty to communicate all pertinent information to all stakeholders.
 
See my post. Intel has the duty to communicate all pertinent information to all stakeholders.

Yes, but that doesn’t give anyone a license to steal. If you choose to disregard intellectual property, that is your own decision, but please don’t glorify it.
 
Yes, but that doesn’t give anyone a license to steal. If you choose to disregard intellectual property, that is your own decision, but please don’t glorify it.
My intent is the same as your intent with Notebook LM - as a form of notetaking.

Here, I am highlighting the key issue - the event recording platform is not effective and cannot serve all interested stakeholders in a timely manner.
 
So Intel should not build fabs in the US, correct? The total cost for Ireland fabs was cheaper than Taiwan option or Japan Option
IT would have been better for Intel if they were a partner for rapidus they would get the advantage of cheaper than US and better subsidies than US not to mention customer exposure due to government forcing them.
 
Back
Top