Array
(
    [content] => 
    [params] => Array
        (
            [0] => /forum/threads/intel-has-manufacturing-capacity-issues-they-may-take-years-to-fix.24681/
        )

    [addOns] => Array
        (
            [DL6/MLTP] => 13
            [Hampel/TimeZoneDebug] => 1000070
            [SV/ChangePostDate] => 2010200
            [SemiWiki/Newsletter] => 1000010
            [SemiWiki/WPMenu] => 1000010
            [SemiWiki/XPressExtend] => 1000010
            [ThemeHouse/XLink] => 1000970
            [ThemeHouse/XPress] => 1010570
            [XF] => 2030970
            [XFI] => 1060170
        )

    [wordpress] => /var/www/html
)

Intel has manufacturing capacity issues. They may take years to fix.

Fred Chen

Moderator
The company redirected some of its chips production to meet surging server demand, but analysts say it’s missing out on emerging AI-driven trends.

Published March 3, 2026 Nathan Owens

Technology companies are clamoring for processors, especially hyperscalers looking to power their data centers.

The demand is so strong and supply is so tight that Intel redirected some of its production lines from consumer chips to Xeon server chips. On an earnings call Jan. 22, CFO David Zinsner said he expects wafer supplies to improve over the next six months, noting that supplies are most constrained in the first quarter.

“It’s just literally hand-to-mouth, what we can get out of the fab and what we can get to customers is how we’re managing it,” Zinsner said.

Intel, unlike fabless companies AMD and Nvidia, can leverage its own production facilities as demand outpaces supply. When asked about the imbalance, Zinsner saw it as “largely a win.”

Then again, there’s only so much available capacity. Entering 2026, he said, buffer inventory is depleted and the shift in wafers toward server chips won’t come out of the fab until later in the first quarter.

In short, Intel is missing out at a critical point in the market. On the call, CEO Lip-Bu Tan said his team is “working tirelessly” to drive efficiency and increase output, but he is also mindful of the challenges ahead.

During the fourth quarter, Intel’s data center segment grew 9% to $4.7 billion over last year. At the same time, consumer sales, which account for the majority of Intel’s revenue, declined 7% as the company looks to ramp up its foundry business and capture AI-driven trends.

“I’m disappointed that we are not able to fully meet the demand in our markets,” Tan said. He also noted that Intel is on a “multiyear journey” and “it will take time and resolve” to rebuild the company.

Investor sentiment wavered following Intel’s latest earnings call and results. Brian Colello, a senior equity analyst at Morningstar, said the thought on Wall Street was that Intel’s supply shortages would result in higher pricing and perhaps a stronger quarter. Many people were also expecting the company to announce a large foundry customer such as Apple or Nvidia, he added.

“I think Intel let them down on both fronts,” Colello said. “It’s always great when you can sell everything you can make, but it could have been better than probably the most optimistic of assumptions.”

The surge in data center demand is also affecting other U.S. chip companies. Nvidia’s CFO Colette Kress said on a recent earnings call that she believes inventory and supply commitments are in place to address growing demand, including shipments through next year. However, she said that supply tightness in server chips will likely persist.

Lisa Su, AMD’s chair, president and CEO, noted similar activity on a separate call, saying the company is working with supply chain partners to increase output. AMD, one of Intel’s biggest competitors, reported data center revenue of $5.4 billion in the quarter, up 39% from a year ago.

AMD and Nvidia both rely on Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. or Samsung as manufacturing partners for their computer chips. Intel does as well for most of its advanced current and future products, the company disclosed in its latest annual report. The difference is that Intel is facing higher overhead costs as it works to further establish its foundry business and grow its customer base.

Bank of America analyst Vivek Arya wrote in a research brief that Intel’s foundry business could need another two to three years to reach its full potential. He noted that Intel’s current 18a node, or process for making semiconductors, delivers low yields. If the company is currently struggling with output from its current-generation node, “it may not be able to promise flawless execution to external customers at the more advanced 14a process.”

On the call, Tan said Intel recently started shipping out its products built on 18a, and yields are steadily improving.

In addition to explosive server chip demand, advancements in agentic AI are also driving a comeback for general-purpose processors because the technology does not require as much processing power, Manoj Sukumaran, a senior principal analyst at Omdia, said in an email.

“The market was not prepared for this kind of explosive [central processing unit] demand,” Sukumaran said. “So everyone is facing the heat now.”

Currently, all of TSMC’s leading edge nodes are booked by companies like Nvidia, Apple, AMD, Broadcom and more.

“Even if Intel would like to increase CPU shipments, they can’t do it because TSMC capacity is not available,” Sukumaran said. “The bottleneck for Intel is the compute chiplets manufactured by TSMC rather than their own manufacturing constraint.”

 
As I mentioned on Linked In and was discussed here a feww weeks ago. The capacity constraint is Intel 7, Not 18A and not TSMC. Apparently Intel made some decisions expecting Intel 7 to move to TSMC and 18A and this did not happen.... so they are adding Intel 7 capacity now. and it should be noted that Intel has capacity issues when revenue and market share are going down. There is a reason why this happened and why Intel could not manage the conversion from Intel 7. Wildcat lake may be able to help this.

The possible demand from external customers is not needed until 2028 (the designs have not be signed yet). Intel has options to get that capacity if it is needed (Fab 62).
 
I'm gonna take this guy with a few grains of salt:
1772756469782.png
 
I published an update on what caused the shortages, where they are and how they can .... or cannot be fixed.
www.mkwventures.com or https://mkwsemiconductors.substack.com/

Spoiler alert: Plan to introduce new technologies and push people to them. People dont want the new products and they are not cost effective. realize you dont have capacity anymore on old technologies.

Spoiler 2: If you dont ramp it, it never becomes cost effective....... if you do ramp it, you loose billions until it does become cost effective.

I believe it was Otellini who said (paraphrase) they spend 10 Billion building a factory for a process that doesnt work yet for products that havent been designed yet for customers who have not agreed to buy parts yet.
 
I published an update on what caused the shortages, where they are and how they can .... or cannot be fixed.
www.mkwventures.com or https://mkwsemiconductors.substack.com/
Thank you for sharing -- I appreciate the insight into the Intel machine.

Question from your article:

"Apparently, they did remove Intel 7 capacity assuming people would jump to new products. Historically, this has always been a problem and Intel was able to deal with it. Tell customers they have to move"

Has this always been a thing at Intel (i.e. even 1990s), or was there a starting point where the 'you will be forced to move' happened? A long time ago, Intel's newer products were often so good, you'd be a fool not to move.

(I recall a major division of Lockheed Martin was throwing out 2-3 year old equipment when Nehalem came out as it was a huge upgrade for their data centers in basically one generation, circa 2010 or so).

..

P.S. One minor comment on the article -- Panther Lake has some 'tail winds': AMD is shifting wafers to server/compute (from mobile), and seems to be seeking margins rather than market share in the current generation. This should mean Intel has less pricing competition in markets that can afford the premium (corporate laptops, mid range "workstation" laptops). Zen 6 is also looking like a 2027 product, and since AMD mobile usually trails desktop and server; Panther Lake has 4-5 quarters without facing a next-gen product. I wouldn't say this is a miracle for Intel, but it is an opportunity.

Zinger - If IFS is profitable in 2030, then at least they'll be profitable before OpenAI...
 
Back
Top