You are currently viewing SemiWiki as a guest which gives you limited access to the site. To view blog comments and experience other SemiWiki features you must be a registered member. Registration is fast, simple, and absolutely free so please, join our community today!
Hot off the presses, we have confirmation from multiple employees that Intel is cutting costs tremendously at the expense of their employees. These cuts are broad-based, with employees having their…
Hot off the presses, we have confirmation from multiple employees that Intel is cutting costs tremendously at the expense of their employees. These cuts are broad-based, with employees having their…
If this is true. Wooooof. Prioritizing the dividend over talent retention is nightmare fuel for those you appreciate good management. If I were an Intel investor I would be shouting from the rooftops to cut the dividend before talent. What a terrible strategic decision. TSMC should look to scoop up and disgruntled employees.
Good lord who thought this was a good idea!!! Unbelievable. This is what happens when the finance guys on the board run amok. What is morale like from your Intel friend? Must be rough. My heart goes out to the employees getting wage cuts in an inflationary environment. Just brutal
This is just unbelievable. Pat is probably putting himself on the back (no pun intended) for the 25% pay cut. Doesn’t mean squat when the base pay is already so high. Everyone else is still going to feel the pain way more than he will ever do. Who’s this new CFO they’ve got. Heard he’s not the nicest guy but good lord, now I’m sure he must be a real Scrooge.
What is morale like from your Intel friend? Must be rough. My heart goes out to the employees getting wage cures in an inflationary environment. Just brutal
I already made my opinion know on how important the dividend is for Intel to keep it's stock value higher and ensure they can get the loans necessary for expansions that IFS requires, so I won''t restate them here. Of course people are welcome to their own opinions on the matter, but personally I have never seen an argument for axing the dividend that was convincing.
Who’s this new CFO they’ve got. Heard he’s not the nicest guy but good lord, now I’m sure he must be a real Scrooge.
I already made my opinion know on how important the dividend is for Intel to keep it's stock value higher and ensure they can get the loans necessary for expansions that IFS requires, so I won''t restate them here. Of course people are welcome to their own opinions on the matter, but personally I have never seen an argument for axing the dividend that was convincing.
In the old days banks and lenders were willing to accept business borrower's company stocks or major shareholders' stocks as the collateral. But today especially in the Intel's case, I don't think that's feasible or relevant.
In the old days banks and lenders were willing to accept business borrower's company stocks or major shareholders' stocks as the collateral. But today especially in the Intel's case, I don't think that's feasible or relevant.
Gelsinger did bring back some a few of his old allies, at the Senior Fellow and SVP level, but I wouldn't call them a big investment in the context of Intel's total spending.
Gelsinger did bring back some a few of his old allies, at the Senior Fellow and SVP level, but I wouldn't call them a big investment in the context of Intel's total spending.
www.semianalysis.com
