Array
(
    [content] => 
    [params] => Array
        (
            [0] => /forum/threads/intel%E2%80%99s-ceo-under-attack-from-trump-is-already-at-odds-with-his-board.23370/
        )

    [addOns] => Array
        (
            [DL6/MLTP] => 13
            [Hampel/TimeZoneDebug] => 1000070
            [SV/ChangePostDate] => 2010200
            [SemiWiki/Newsletter] => 1000010
            [SemiWiki/WPMenu] => 1000010
            [SemiWiki/XPressExtend] => 1000010
            [ThemeHouse/XLink] => 1000970
            [ThemeHouse/XPress] => 1010570
            [XF] => 2021770
            [XFI] => 1050270
        )

    [wordpress] => /var/www/html
)

Intel’s CEO, Under Attack From Trump, Is Already at Odds With His Board

hist78

Well-known member

Lip-Bu Tan and chip maker’s directors have been clashing over how to revive the struggling tech giant​


Yeary, a former investment banker, had drawn up a plan for Intel to exit from the foundry business entirely earlier this year when acting as interim executive chair. Yeary’s proposal involved spinning out the business and having other companies such as Nvidia and Amazon take stakes in it, the people said. Yeary also explored brokering a sale of the business to Taiwan’s TSMC, the people said, but that effort went nowhere.

Tan, on the other hand, has argued that Intel’s foundry business is integral to its success and needed to ensure the U.S. doesn’t become reliant on foreign semiconductor companies such as TSMC and Samsung, the people said. (While TSMC and Samsung have committed to building more plants in the U.S., critics say their research and development efforts are still centralized elsewhere.)

More recently, Intel had lined up a handful of Wall Street investment banks to facilitate a multibillion-dollar capital raise, with the aim of using the money to invest in its fabrication plants and bolster the company’s balance sheet, the people said.

Management hoped to kick off the efforts around the company’s most recent quarterly earnings report in late July. But some board members, including Yeary, wanted to move on a slower timeline than Tan and pushed it back, possibly to 2026, the people said.



Source:
https://www.wsj.com/tech/intel-ceo-lip-bu-tan-trump-board-9cc08631?reflink=desktopwebshare_permalink
 
CEO is not a big deal compared to the bad deeds that the board of directors did
It's because of the extraordinary board of directors that he's always dragged Intel's legs.
80%+ of the BOD has been replaced. Correct? And only One CEO lost >50% of the Market value. Please look at performance by CEO...
 
80%+ of the BOD has been replaced. Correct? And only One CEO lost >50% of the Market value. Please look at performance by CEO...
He also failed... But no matter what It's embarrassing to put all the responsibility on GelSinger
Well, actually, Gel Singer just took on dirty work.
What has piled up so far has just collapsed in the age of GelSinger.
There's even a big sinner called BK
 
It's short-sighted to put all the responsibility on PG, but it's simple, pleasant, and you don't need to twist your head, so I agree that you just do it.
However, there are multiple factors that led to this kind of thing, so it's extremely difficult to make a decision to make the PG alone's responsibility.
 
It's short-sighted to put all the responsibility on PG, but it's simple, pleasant, and you don't need to twist your head, so I agree that you just do it.
However, there are multiple factors that led to this kind of thing, so it's extremely difficult to make a decision to make the PG alone's responsibility.
The Stock price drop was based on going all in on foundry, Starting to build multiple fabs, Finding out IFS is a horrible money losing business, and then finding there are no meaningful customers (Foundry revenue dropped in 2023 and 2024) None of that has anything to do with any other CEO (Other CEOs thought it was crazy to go all in on foundry given the financials). And of course ALL of this was predicted in 2021-2022.

NOW AI failure and DC CPU markets share loss ... all CEOs are equally responsible for that nonsense .... Intel Culture killed them.

LBT will fix this by improving Org speed.....

Side note: I also have some good anecdotal comments from last week on how Intel was "working with" foundry customers .... At no point would it be called "partnering" :LOL: :ROFLMAO: :LOL: :ROFLMAO:
 
The Stock price drop was based on going all in on foundry, Starting to build multiple fabs, Finding out IFS is a horrible money losing business, and then finding there are no meaningful customers (Foundry revenue dropped in 2023 and 2024) None of that has anything to do with any other CEO (Other CEOs thought it was crazy to go all in on foundry given the financials). And of course ALL of this was predicted in 2021-2022.

NOW AI failure and DC CPU markets share loss ... all CEOs are equally responsible for that nonsense .... Intel Culture killed them.

LBT will fix this by improving Org speed.....

Side note: I also have some good anecdotal comments from last week on how Intel was "working with" foundry customers .... At no point would it be called "partnering" :LOL: :ROFLMAO: :LOL: :ROFLMAO:
Well, Intel is a gathering of idiots, so it can never be revived.
Why can't I understand if Intel can never be revived?
If you twist your head a little, you should be able to figure it out
 
Back
Top