AFAIK Cerebras have not done this for the scaled-up AI case which will drive the entire industry in the next few years (as opposed to particular benchmarks that they chose) and neither has any independent test including anything on SemiAnalysis -- am I wrong?
I think you are correct - they have found a lucrative sub-market market for super-fast response times and token production. For instance, Opus-4.6 from Anthropic on Cerebras, is fast is but ~5x more expensive than the regular version on Cursor. Not sure if and when Cerebras will benchmark over a broader operating range outside of their sweet spot.
I find this guy's blogs to be interesting on the hardware/software challenges of serving coding agents. He explains why different compute paradigms / architectures are needed for different phases of inference for coding agents.
CES and Groq "Acqui-hire" Reflection: Nvidia's Plan to Build Real Time Agents? | Hanchen Li
Opus-4.6 and GPT-5.3-Codex both use 𝗖𝗲𝗿𝗲𝗯𝗿𝗮𝘀 for fast inference options. Seems like companies are 𝗱𝗶𝘀𝗰𝗮𝗿𝗱𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗡𝘃𝗶𝗱𝗶𝗮 for real-time agents. But is this the future trend? In my newest blog, I argue that Nvidia’s latest moves still demonstrate great potential for fast but economical agent...
He's one of the guys who originally developed KV caching, while doing a post-Doc at University of Chicago. Now has a startup that is focused on making inference far more cost efficient.
Last edited:
