Array
(
    [content] => 
    [params] => Array
        (
            [0] => /forum/search/292887/?c%5Busers%5D=Fred+Chen&o=date&page=7
        )

    [addOns] => Array
        (
            [DL6/MLTP] => 13
            [Hampel/TimeZoneDebug] => 1000070
            [SV/ChangePostDate] => 2010200
            [SemiWiki/Newsletter] => 1000010
            [SemiWiki/WPMenu] => 1000010
            [SemiWiki/XPressExtend] => 1000010
            [ThemeHouse/XLink] => 1000970
            [ThemeHouse/XPress] => 1010570
            [XF] => 2021770
            [XFI] => 1050270
        )

    [wordpress] => /var/www/html
)

Search results

  1. F

    Panther lake delay?

    I don't know why they couldn't have said something like "it's even better than Meteor Lake yield at launch" rather than the whole qualifying statement.
  2. F

    Panther lake delay?

    To me, saying PTL yield is slightly ahead of MTL yield at a similar point in time during development, is not exactly the highest of praise.
  3. F

    Taiwan suggests $100bn Trump semiconductor deal is not guaranteed

    Country’s government says deal with TSMC needs state assessment and it may protect its most advanced tech Helen Davidson in Taipei Tue 4 Mar 2025 12.20 GMT Taiwan’s government has suggested a $100bn semiconductor deal between Donald Trump and the Taiwanese chip maker TSMC is not guaranteed...
  4. F

    TSMC CEO to meet with Trump to tout investment plans

    There's some seeing this as win-win? https://english.cw.com.tw/article/article.action?id=3988
  5. F

    TSMC CEO to meet with Trump to tout investment plans

    Trump's "monopoly" referral implies he thinks Intel doesn't have a strong position (against TSMC) even now.
  6. F

    Exclusive: Nvidia and Broadcom testing chips on Intel manufacturing process, sources say

    The 18A process was already delayed to 2026 for potential contract manufacturing customers. Now, according to supplier documents reviewed by Reuters and two sources familiar with the matter, Intel has pushed back its timeline another six months. The delay is due to the need to qualify crucial...
  7. F

    Trump wants TSMC to take over Intel’s plants. That’s a terrible idea—here’s what needs to happen instead

    While Intel Foundry is not split off from Intel Product, there's always the concern for AMD, Nvidia, or Apple that their designs are not completely safe when handed over to Intel Foundry, or that their business will not get sufficient priority compared to Intel Product. After all, Intel Product...
  8. F

    TSMC Will Not Take Over Intel Operations

    Not sure if that has been defined clearly so far.
  9. F

    Updating our current logic density benchmarking methodologies

    It seems this formula has been around for years, but not necessarily followed (from https://www.angstronomics.com/p/the-truth-of-tsmc-5nm): Going directly by the picture, it works out to 1.56 transistors/CPP/Cell height. It hasn't been followed by everyone obviously. One example is Wikichip...
  10. F

    Intel produced 30,000 wafers on ASML's high NA EUV

    If the "earlier" machines are the previous EUV NA, he might be talking about ~ 20 nm pitch. imec had just released some results for 20 nm pitch: https://www.imec-int.com/en/press/imec-demonstrates-electrical-yield-20nm-pitch-metal-lines-obtained-high-na-euv-single, still rough as expected...
  11. F

    Intel produced 30,000 wafers on ASML's high NA EUV

    It's likely (or hopefully) not used most of that time.
  12. F

    Intel produced 30,000 wafers on ASML's high NA EUV

    This should be a general new generation vs older generation thing. 3800 model should be similar improvement over older models.
  13. F

    ISSCC N2 and 18A has same SRAM Density.

    Looking at some prior but recent generations' SRAM design examples, of course they were frontside but they had Vss and Vdd lines on different metal layers. This is unlike the standard logic arrangement of both Vss and Vdd on same layer. I wonder if backside routing could not support so many...
  14. F

    ISSCC N2 and 18A has same SRAM Density.

    So Vss, Vdd connections for SRAM array are frontside, can't be backside?
  15. F

    ISSCC N2 and 18A has same SRAM Density.

    Yes, I saw that afterwards. Makes me wonder where else they would exclude PowerVia.
  16. F

    ISSCC N2 and 18A has same SRAM Density.

    I'm not saying it couldn't have been expected, just that it was odd to put this counter-spin to PowerVia at this time. I guess it means PowerVia will only be implemented in non-SRAM sections of the chip.
  17. F

    ISSCC N2 and 18A has same SRAM Density.

    Odd report: PowerVia didn't help bit cell density, made it worse in fact.
  18. F

    1b, 1c DRAM redesign by Samsung

    Samsung to increase next-generation DRAM 'chip size'... HBM Yield Improvement Priority Weigh in on yield stabilization instead of productivity... Earnings expected by the end of the second quarter Semiconductor Display Input:2025/02/10 17:05 Modified: 2025/02/11 10:09 Jang Kyung-yoon It is...
Back
Top