Array
(
    [content] => 
    [params] => Array
        (
            [0] => /forum/index.php?threads/power-consumption-of-fabs-through-the-roof-danger-ahead.21411/
        )

    [addOns] => Array
        (
            [DL6/MLTP] => 13
            [Hampel/TimeZoneDebug] => 1000070
            [SV/ChangePostDate] => 2010200
            [SemiWiki/Newsletter] => 1000010
            [SemiWiki/WPMenu] => 1000010
            [SemiWiki/XPressExtend] => 1000010
            [ThemeHouse/XLink] => 1000970
            [ThemeHouse/XPress] => 1010570
            [XF] => 2021370
            [XFI] => 1050270
        )

    [wordpress] => /var/www/html
)

Power consumption of fabs through the roof, Danger ahead?

Arthur Hanson

Well-known member
The power consumption of chip fabrication plants has climbed to a point this could be an Achilles Heal in the near future. It seems nuclear power may be the only answer. Any thoughts or comments on this appreciated.

The dead end of chips: Manufacturing semiconductors consumes as much energy as entire countries


Two workers at ASML's facilities in Veldhoven, the Netherlands.

Two workers at ASML's facilities in Veldhoven, the Netherlands.© EL PAÍS

The first half of 2024 marked a high point for Nvidia, the leading U.S. company in the chip industry. The firm tripled its global shipments of semiconductors, underscoring a prevailing truth of our time: the world is hungry for this tiny technology. However, the production of these semiconductors faces a significant challenge: the growing demand for electrical energy required for their manufacture. Experts warn that fulfilling the surging market demand for microprocessors may hinder the green transition. The sophisticated and intricate equipment used to print cutting-edge chips consumes vast amounts of electrical energy, which is essential for advancing technologies such as artificial intelligence and data centers.

Specifically, microprocessors — the tiny rectangular plates found in computers, washing machines, and cell phones — are manufactured using complex extreme ultraviolet lithography (EUV) machines. This process involves bathing silicon wafers, the foundational material for chips, in light waves that are invisible to the human eye.

According to Bloomberg, the latest models of these specialized devices consume around one megawatt of electricity, which is equivalent to the average energy consumption of a Spanish household over four months. A decade ago, the U.S. consulting firm McKinsey warned that a typical semiconductor manufacturing plant consumes as much energy annually as about 50,000 homes. The firm noted that these “mega factories” were using more electricity than automotive plants and refineries combined.

An extreme ultraviolet lithography system manufactured by chip manufacturer ASML, in an image provided by the company.


An extreme ultraviolet lithography system manufactured by chip manufacturer ASML, in an image provided by the company.© ASML (EL PAÍS)
José Luis Costa, an expert in nanotechnology, acknowledges that this situation is currently not seen as a problem in most regions, “because it is a strategically critical sector where there will be no impediments to energy expenditure.” Beyond consumer electronics, the arms, space, and automobile industries have also made chips an indispensable part of their product development. According to the World Semiconductor Trade Statistics, global sales of microprocessors surged by 16.3% year-on-year at the beginning of this year, reaching $39.7 billion, and are projected to grow by another 13.1% in 2024.

The key player in the manufacturing of this technology is Taiwan, home to the leading chip manufacturer, Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSMC). It is estimated that 60% to 70% of global chip production originates from this small island in East Asia. Bloomberg reports that due to the significant electricity consumption required to operate the lithography machines, TSMC is expected to soon consume more energy than the entire population of countries like Sri Lanka, which has 21 million residents. In 2020, the company accounted for about 6% of Taiwan’s total energy consumption, a figure projected to rise to 12.5% by 2025.

The problem is that Taiwan’s semiconductor industry is heavily reliant on fossil fuels, with more than 80% of its energy derived from burning coal and gas, according to data from the News Lines Institute think tank. To address this issue, in 2016, the island’s government aimed to obtain 20% of its electricity from renewable sources by 2025, by developing solar power and offshore wind capacity.

However, this target appears increasingly unattainable. The latest energy analysis, released in July, revealed that only 6% of energy was projected to come from renewable sources by the end of 2021, prompting officials to lower the target to 15%. As Liang Chi-Yuan, a professor of management at National Central University in Taoyuan, pointed out in a Bloomberg report, Taiwan will lack the necessary power capacity to support its semiconductor industry unless chipmakers begin constructing their own power supply plants.


People walk outside the building of chipmaker TSMC in Taiwan, July 28.

People walk outside the building of chipmaker TSMC in Taiwan, July 28.© ANN WANG (Reuters)

Other countries with a long history of semiconductor manufacturing are facing a similar dilemma. In South Korea, tech giant Samsung operates six semiconductor manufacturing plants that accounted for 3% of the country’s energy bill in 2021. However, in its efforts to compete directly with TSMC in manufacturing chips for external customers, it plans to expand its number of EUV machines. This influx of new equipment poses a significant challenge to South Korea’s energy framework, which is also heavily reliant on coal and gas. Until 2018, approximately 80% of the country’s energy came from these fossil fuels, according to the Asian Development Bank.

“Chip manufacturing processes require extreme precision and rigorous control, often resulting in huge demands on electricity and water. In addition, many of the materials used in semiconductor manufacturing, such as silicon, require intensive, energy-intensive extraction and purification processes. For these reasons, this production model is not sustainable in the long term,” says Costa.

The industry contends that advancements in semiconductor technology are driving improvements in sustainability and energy efficiency in other areas. Taiwan’s Institute for International Industrial Technology Strategy argues that for every kilowatt of electricity produced by TSMC, the global energy savings could be up to four kilowatts.

Costa partially agrees with this perspective, noting that more sustainable methods of chip production are currently under investigation. These include using light to process information or exploring quantum states that promise to be highly efficient while significantly reducing energy consumption and environmental impact. For instance, Canon has announced plans to enter the lithography machine market — currently dominated by the Dutch firm ASML — through nano printing, which Costa claims could achieve similar results at a fraction of the cost and energy consumption.

Other players in the chip industry, such as Intel, are also striving to make their operations greener and more sustainable, albeit to a lesser extent. The American company has managed to surpass its Asian competitors in renewable energy usage, partly thanks to access to green energy at its facilities in Arizona, New Mexico, and Oregon. According to Bloomberg, Intel sourced 80% of its electricity from renewable resources in 2021, up from 71% the previous year. However, the media outlet also notes that overall electricity consumption is significantly increasing due to advanced manufacturing techniques.

Photograph provided by Google showing Axion, its first Arm-based central processing unit (CPU).

Photograph provided by Google showing Axion, its first Arm-based central processing unit (CPU).© Google / EFE (EFE)

In the race to dominate this complex market, which requires numerous layers of design and manufacturing, several countries have committed substantial funds to develop their own semiconductor manufacturing capacity, aiming to mitigate supply chain disruptions like those experienced during the pandemic. The United States has approved a $52 billion plan to establish its own factories, while the European Union has allocated €49 billion ($53 billion) to attract foreign investment. However, environmental considerations do not appear to be a major priority in either region. “The challenges are already too complex; in that context, energy and environmental arguments are, sadly, secondary,” says Costa.

The demand for lithographic machines continues to surge. Bloomberg Intelligence analyst Masharo Wakasugi predicts that ASML, the only company capable of designing and manufacturing these machines, will sell 30% more EUV machines this year, leading to increased energy consumption for manufacturing countries. “We must become aware as individuals of the emergency situation we are in and demand that something be done about it. If we do not act now, in 20 years we will feel the consequences,” he warns.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
There is a lot of investment in nuclear power start-ups for that specific reason. Fabs, datacenters, anything AI related. The power grids around the world will not support the current AI surge which may last for several more years.
 
Electricity use in the US is growing at a fairly slow rate for the past 20 years, Correct? How much do you think overall Electricity use is expected to increase over the next 5 years?
 
Yet another doomsday prediction by non-expert in the field under discussion (in this case power generation and distribution), and I especially like the moaning about the lack of environmental sensitivity in EUV lithography at the end of the article (Not).

I think the upcoming electrical demands from fabs and datacenters are a good thing for the US. We've needed economic reasons to upgrade our generation technology and our power grid technology for decades, and we've fallen far behind in both. As Dan pointed out, there's a lot more investment happening in nuclear generation, and our grid needs a serious upgrade to higher transmission voltages and DC. And we need to streamline our permitting processes to get things done more quickly, and some of the least efficient permitting processes in government involve power plants and high voltage transmission lines. Maybe now we'll get to work.
 
Electricity use in the US is growing at a fairly slow rate for the past 20 years, Correct? How much do you think overall Electricity use is expected to increase over the next 5 years?

Is that true? I found this. Industrial and transportation have to be growing.

1731026463710.png
 
Electricity use in the US is growing at a fairly slow rate for the past 20 years, Correct? How much do you think overall Electricity use is expected to increase over the next 5 years?

The "usage" and electricity adoption is actually growing. The net kWh is staying still because everything is becoming more energy efficient with semiconductors, and rooftop solar offsets reduces electricity consumption from the grid, especially in sunny states. But there are hugely more air conditioning, more lighting, more ventilation, more powered appliances, etc.

This is why "going back to dumb devices in case of semiconductor production outage" is completely impossible. You can't make even very simple appliances without electronics now, because all the "dumb" mechanical/analog parts are no longer manufactured, and it's near impossible to resume their production because people like expert glass blowers making mercury valves, manual machinists, analog electronics people are no longer on the labour market, their know-how has been lost.
 
The power consumption of chip fabrication plants has climbed to a point this could be an Achilles Heal in the near future. It seems nuclear power may be the only answer. Any thoughts or comments on this appreciated.

The dead end of chips: Manufacturing semiconductors consumes as much energy as entire countries


Two workers at ASML's facilities in Veldhoven, the Netherlands.'s facilities in Veldhoven, the Netherlands.

Two workers at ASML's facilities in Veldhoven, the Netherlands.© EL PAÍS

The first half of 2024 marked a high point for Nvidia, the leading U.S. company in the chip industry. The firm tripled its global shipments of semiconductors, underscoring a prevailing truth of our time: the world is hungry for this tiny technology. However, the production of these semiconductors faces a significant challenge: the growing demand for electrical energy required for their manufacture. Experts warn that fulfilling the surging market demand for microprocessors may hinder the green transition. The sophisticated and intricate equipment used to print cutting-edge chips consumes vast amounts of electrical energy, which is essential for advancing technologies such as artificial intelligence and data centers.

Specifically, microprocessors — the tiny rectangular plates found in computers, washing machines, and cell phones — are manufactured using complex extreme ultraviolet lithography (EUV) machines. This process involves bathing silicon wafers, the foundational material for chips, in light waves that are invisible to the human eye.

According to Bloomberg, the latest models of these specialized devices consume around one megawatt of electricity, which is equivalent to the average energy consumption of a Spanish household over four months. A decade ago, the U.S. consulting firm McKinsey warned that a typical semiconductor manufacturing plant consumes as much energy annually as about 50,000 homes. The firm noted that these “mega factories” were using more electricity than automotive plants and refineries combined.

An extreme ultraviolet lithography system manufactured by chip manufacturer ASML, in an image provided by the company.


An extreme ultraviolet lithography system manufactured by chip manufacturer ASML, in an image provided by the company.© ASML (EL PAÍS)
José Luis Costa, an expert in nanotechnology, acknowledges that this situation is currently not seen as a problem in most regions, “because it is a strategically critical sector where there will be no impediments to energy expenditure.” Beyond consumer electronics, the arms, space, and automobile industries have also made chips an indispensable part of their product development. According to the World Semiconductor Trade Statistics, global sales of microprocessors surged by 16.3% year-on-year at the beginning of this year, reaching $39.7 billion, and are projected to grow by another 13.1% in 2024.

The key player in the manufacturing of this technology is Taiwan, home to the leading chip manufacturer, Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSMC). It is estimated that 60% to 70% of global chip production originates from this small island in East Asia. Bloomberg reports that due to the significant electricity consumption required to operate the lithography machines, TSMC is expected to soon consume more energy than the entire population of countries like Sri Lanka, which has 21 million residents. In 2020, the company accounted for about 6% of Taiwan’s total energy consumption, a figure projected to rise to 12.5% by 2025.

The problem is that Taiwan’s semiconductor industry is heavily reliant on fossil fuels, with more than 80% of its energy derived from burning coal and gas, according to data from the News Lines Institute think tank. To address this issue, in 2016, the island’s government aimed to obtain 20% of its electricity from renewable sources by 2025, by developing solar power and offshore wind capacity.

However, this target appears increasingly unattainable. The latest energy analysis, released in July, revealed that only 6% of energy was projected to come from renewable sources by the end of 2021, prompting officials to lower the target to 15%. As Liang Chi-Yuan, a professor of management at National Central University in Taoyuan, pointed out in a Bloomberg report, Taiwan will lack the necessary power capacity to support its semiconductor industry unless chipmakers begin constructing their own power supply plants.


People walk outside the building of chipmaker TSMC in Taiwan, July 28.

People walk outside the building of chipmaker TSMC in Taiwan, July 28.© ANN WANG (Reuters)

Other countries with a long history of semiconductor manufacturing are facing a similar dilemma. In South Korea, tech giant Samsung operates six semiconductor manufacturing plants that accounted for 3% of the country’s energy bill in 2021. However, in its efforts to compete directly with TSMC in manufacturing chips for external customers, it plans to expand its number of EUV machines. This influx of new equipment poses a significant challenge to South Korea’s energy framework, which is also heavily reliant on coal and gas. Until 2018, approximately 80% of the country’s energy came from these fossil fuels, according to the Asian Development Bank.

“Chip manufacturing processes require extreme precision and rigorous control, often resulting in huge demands on electricity and water. In addition, many of the materials used in semiconductor manufacturing, such as silicon, require intensive, energy-intensive extraction and purification processes. For these reasons, this production model is not sustainable in the long term,” says Costa.

The industry contends that advancements in semiconductor technology are driving improvements in sustainability and energy efficiency in other areas. Taiwan’s Institute for International Industrial Technology Strategy argues that for every kilowatt of electricity produced by TSMC, the global energy savings could be up to four kilowatts.

Costa partially agrees with this perspective, noting that more sustainable methods of chip production are currently under investigation. These include using light to process information or exploring quantum states that promise to be highly efficient while significantly reducing energy consumption and environmental impact. For instance, Canon has announced plans to enter the lithography machine market — currently dominated by the Dutch firm ASML — through nano printing, which Costa claims could achieve similar results at a fraction of the cost and energy consumption.

Other players in the chip industry, such as Intel, are also striving to make their operations greener and more sustainable, albeit to a lesser extent. The American company has managed to surpass its Asian competitors in renewable energy usage, partly thanks to access to green energy at its facilities in Arizona, New Mexico, and Oregon. According to Bloomberg, Intel sourced 80% of its electricity from renewable resources in 2021, up from 71% the previous year. However, the media outlet also notes that overall electricity consumption is significantly increasing due to advanced manufacturing techniques.

Photograph provided by Google showing Axion, its first Arm-based central processing unit (CPU).

Photograph provided by Google showing Axion, its first Arm-based central processing unit (CPU).© Google / EFE (EFE)

In the race to dominate this complex market, which requires numerous layers of design and manufacturing, several countries have committed substantial funds to develop their own semiconductor manufacturing capacity, aiming to mitigate supply chain disruptions like those experienced during the pandemic. The United States has approved a $52 billion plan to establish its own factories, while the European Union has allocated €49 billion ($53 billion) to attract foreign investment. However, environmental considerations do not appear to be a major priority in either region. “The challenges are already too complex; in that context, energy and environmental arguments are, sadly, secondary,” says Costa.

The demand for lithographic machines continues to surge. Bloomberg Intelligence analyst Masharo Wakasugi predicts that ASML, the only company capable of designing and manufacturing these machines, will sell 30% more EUV machines this year, leading to increased energy consumption for manufacturing countries. “We must become aware as individuals of the emergency situation we are in and demand that something be done about it. If we do not act now, in 20 years we will feel the consequences,” he warns.



There are several factors the author didn't consider:

1. The advancement of semiconductor manufacturing has created and enabled many energy-saving activities. People can now sit at home and join high quality video conferences instead of driving 50 miles or flying 500 miles to attend. Remote work from home or another state saves a lot of energy that would otherwise be spent commuting between home and office. Many companies have even reduced the office space needed without laying off employees. We shouldn't only calculate the one-time energy consumption caused by the semiconductor manufacturing process while totally ignoring a chip's lifetime energy savings and impacts.

2. Following the same line of thinking as described in #1, is a server chip made by Intel using renewable energy really better than an AMD server chip made by TSMC using EUV and coal-generated power?

If an Intel server chip causes 30% more energy consumption and impacts (such as electricity, cooling, and more data center footprint) over 10 years of operation than an AMD chip with similar function, can it wipe out all the benefits of the one-time renewable energy consumption Intel enjoyed?

3. If TSMC uses more energy to produce 100 Apple iPhone chips than Intel uses to make 100 PC CPUs, can we assume Intel is better? The answer is no. Those 100 iPhones perform many functions that 100 Intel CPU-based PCs can’t, and, in many cases, those 100 iPhones save energy by reducing the need for those 100 PCs.

We also need to understand that wafer volume, chip functions, and the number of chips that can be cut from a wafer are hard to compare between Intel and TSMC, for example.

4. Is it bad if a fab consumes a high percentage of energy from the country, province, or state where it operates? I don’t know, but I would leave that to the particular country, province, or state to decide. Otherwise, it’s like sitting in a kitchen at a ranch in Texas, complaining that Wisconsin uses a high percentage of its electricity to produce cheese, that Japan uses too much Japanese energy to keep sushi cold, or that Germany uses too much German electricity to make cars. It’s funny, and it’s not your business to begin with.
 
Last edited:
Is that true? I found this. Industrial and transportation have to be growing.

View attachment 2435
Energy use has growth at a very slow rate for the past 20 year. 10% total in 20 years. the data you show confirms this.
You can google it and it shows by area and for each area what the causes are. great info. Also shows sources of energy.
Yes its because we are getting more efficient. but the data is what the data is.
 
Energy use has growth at a very slow rate for the past 20 year. 10% total in 20 years. the data you show confirms this.
You can google it and it shows by area and for each area what the causes are. great info. Also shows sources of energy.
Yes its because we are getting more efficient. but the data is what the data is.
Just a little data on the residential side. The TL;DR is:
- Energy usage slightly decreased over last 20 years, but up substantially over 40 years
- Larger home sizes are offsetting efficiency increases
- Some new categories of energy usage have been introduced raising the 'floor' for an efficient home, even if "traditional electronic" items like TVs are much more efficient today.

I suspect some of these apply to transportation (ex: computers in every car now) and industrial (ex; smart always on wireless connectivity for everything).

... TMI:

US residential electricity consumption has increased from 3 MWH pp pa in 1982 to 4 MWH pp pa in 2022.

Obviously this doesn't include commercial or industrial which have seen some vast improvements due to lighting and other energy sources, but it's a data point. It looks like bigger homes may be offsetting the efficiency increases (left axis is kWh per meter squared of space):

1731092276776.png


Though over the last 20 years it looks like we are indeed using a little less energy for heating/cooling and refrigeration:

1731092346944.png
 
Back
Top