Array
(
    [content] => 
    [params] => Array
        (
            [0] => /forum/index.php?threads/political-backlash-grows-in-washington-to-chinese-takeovers.7328/
        )

    [addOns] => Array
        (
            [DL6/MLTP] => 13
            [Hampel/TimeZoneDebug] => 1000070
            [SV/ChangePostDate] => 2010200
            [SemiWiki/Newsletter] => 1000010
            [SemiWiki/WPMenu] => 1000010
            [SemiWiki/XPressExtend] => 1000010
            [ThemeHouse/XLink] => 1000970
            [ThemeHouse/XPress] => 1010570
            [XF] => 2021370
            [XFI] => 1050270
        )

    [wordpress] => /var/www/html
)

Political Backlash Grows in Washington to Chinese Takeovers

Daniel Nenni

Admin
Staff member
It looks like Fairchild is back at ON Semi. ON offered $20 per share in cash last year. China Resources Holding offered $21.70 ($2.46B USD). Here is the most interesting quote:

“China’s engaged in a buying spree of international semiconductor firms,” said Michael R. Wessel, a member of the United States-China Economic and Security Review Commission, a group created by Congress to monitor bilateral relations. “What they can’t develop on their own, they intend to buy, if they can, or steal, if they must.

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/02/18/b...onductor-bid-rejected.html?smid=li-share&_r=0

HONG KONG — As Chinese companies try to snap up American tech businesses, they are setting off ripples of unease in the Obama administration and in Congress, inciting a backlash that has stopped the latest acquisition attempt.

One of the companies that first brought silicon to Silicon Valley — Fairchild Semiconductor International — said it would remain in American hands after rejecting a takeover offer worth about $2.5 billion led by Chinese state-backed buyers. Instead, Fairchild embraced a smaller bid from an American rival on Tuesday, citing concerns that federal regulators might reject the Chinese deal....
 
Last edited:
I am not sure whether the current deal is "fair" for Fairchild. However, taking a longer term view if they feel to be safer under federal regulation regime, then that could turnout to be a prudent approach.
 
Back
Top