You are currently viewing SemiWiki as a guest which gives you limited access to the site. To view blog comments and experience other SemiWiki features you must be a registered member. Registration is fast, simple, and absolutely free so please, join our community today!
Interesting Micron Logo change and the summary by @ChemStat66667. Upon this, what can we find the commonality and what will we expect if using infineon as another example?
My thoughts: at bottom.
1. All three have removed the circles (boundaries).
2. Micron change M to low capital m for similar reasons as other companies?
3. Will infineon remove the red boundary soon?
The site www.logos-world.net has such comment on TSMC's logo. It's kind of funny though. The writer of the comment probably has no idea about a semiconductor wafer.
"The TSMC logo is not particularly innovative; it feels stuck in the past century, as it features a perforated surface reminiscent of the early days of programming. At the same time, the emblem reflects the reliability and stability of the semiconductor manufacturer for various electronic devices."
The site www.logos-world.net has such comment on TSMC's logo. It's kind of funny though. The writer of the comment probably has no idea about a semiconductor wafer.
"The TSMC logo is not particularly innovative; it feels stuck in the past century, as it features a perforated surface reminiscent of the early days of programming. At the same time, the emblem reflects the reliability and stability of the semiconductor manufacturer for various electronic devices."
The episode of low capital in "tsmc" is: the Symbol of "T" implies there is a bar on top and hard to breakthrough it. Choosing t implies the company can always breakthrough the bar above. Not expect them to change it.
The episode of low capital in "tsmc" is: the Symbol of "T" implies there is a bar on top and hard to breakthrough it. Choosing t implies the company can always breakthrough the bar above. Not expect they to change it.
By looking at TSMC's past annual reports, around and before 2000 its logo actually had more black sections than the current one and used black color as the background. I think to improve the wafer manufacturing yield, the logo design is very important.
The site www.logos-world.net has such comment on TSMC's logo. It's kind of funny though. The writer of the comment probably has no idea about a semiconductor wafer.
"The TSMC logo is not particularly innovative; it feels stuck in the past century, as it features a perforated surface reminiscent of the early days of programming. At the same time, the emblem reflects the reliability and stability of the semiconductor manufacturer for various electronic devices."
By looking at TSMC's past annual reports, around and before 2000 its logo actually had more black sections than the current one and used black color as the background. I think to improve the wafer manufacturing yield, the logo design is very important.
By looking at TSMC's past annual reports, around and before 2000 its logo actually had more black sections than the current one and used black color as the background. I think to improve the wafer manufacturing yield, the logo design is very important.
I do remember hearing a comment at TSMC that they did increase yield with the new logo. I highly doubt TSMC paid millions for the logo. Morris would not do that. I would bet it was done in-house. The above the bar comment is correct and very accurate as it turns out. In fact, TSMC has raised the bar as well.
The site www.logos-world.net has such comment on TSMC's logo. It's kind of funny though. The writer of the comment probably has no idea about a semiconductor wafer.
"The TSMC logo is not particularly innovative; it feels stuck in the past century, as it features a perforated surface reminiscent of the early days of programming. At the same time, the emblem reflects the reliability and stability of the semiconductor manufacturer for various electronic devices."