Array
(
    [content] => 
    [params] => Array
        (
            [0] => /forum/index.php?threads/intel-reducing-staff-by-15-and-dividend-suspended.20721/
        )

    [addOns] => Array
        (
            [DL6/MLTP] => 13
            [Hampel/TimeZoneDebug] => 1000070
            [SV/ChangePostDate] => 2010200
            [SemiWiki/Newsletter] => 1000010
            [SemiWiki/WPMenu] => 1000010
            [SemiWiki/XPressExtend] => 1000010
            [ThemeHouse/XLink] => 1000970
            [ThemeHouse/XPress] => 1010570
            [XF] => 2021370
            [XFI] => 1050270
        )

    [wordpress] => /var/www/html
)

Intel reducing staff by 15% and dividend suspended

From the Intel company website:


Intel CEO Pat Gelsinger sent the following note to employees after second-quarter 2024 earnings were published on Aug. 1, 2024:

Team,

We have moved our All Company Meeting to today, following our earnings call, as we are announcing significant actions to reduce our costs. We plan to deliver $10 billion in cost savings in 2025, and this includes reducing our head count by roughly 15,000 roles, or 15% of our workforce. The majority of these actions will be completed by the end of this year.

This is painful news for me to share. I know it will be even more difficult for you to read. This is an incredibly hard day for Intel as we are making some of the most consequential changes in our company’s history. When we meet in a few hours, I’ll talk about why we’re doing this and what you can expect in the coming weeks. In advance of that, I wanted to preview some of what’s on my mind.

Simply put, we must align our cost structure with our new operating model and fundamentally change the way we operate. Our revenues have not grown as expected – and we’ve yet to fully benefit from powerful trends, like AI. Our costs are too high, our margins are too low. We need bolder actions to address both – particularly given our financial results and outlook for the second half of 2024, which is tougher than previously expected.

These decisions have challenged me to my core, and this is the hardest thing I’ve done in my career. My pledge to you is that we will prioritize a culture of honesty, transparency and respect in the weeks and months to come.

Next week, we’ll announce a companywide enhanced retirement offering for eligible employees and broadly offer an application program for voluntary departures. I believe that how we implement these changes is just as important as the changes themselves, and we will adhere to Intel values throughout this process.

Why Now?

Since introducing our new operating model, we have taken a clean-sheet view of the business and assessed ourselves against benchmarks for high-performing foundries, fabless product companies and corporate functions. This work made it clear our cost structure is not competitive.

For example, our annual revenue in 2020 was about $24 billion higher than it was last year, yet our current workforce is actually 10% larger now than it was then. There are a lot of reasons for this, but it’s not a sustainable path forward.

Beyond our costs, we need to change the way we operate – something many of you shared as part of our Employee Experience Survey. There’s too much complexity, so we need to both automate and simplify processes. It takes too long for decisions to be made, so we need to eliminate bureaucracy. And there’s too much inefficiency in the system, so we need to expedite workflows.

Key Priorities

The actions we are taking will make Intel a leaner, simpler and more agile company. Let me highlight our areas of focus:



  • Reducing Operational Costs: We will drive companywide operational and cost efficiencies, including the cost savings and head count reductions mentioned above.
  • Simplifying Our Portfolio: We will complete actions this month to simplify our businesses. Each business unit is conducting a portfolio review and identifying underperforming products. We are also integrating key software assets into our business units so we accelerate our shift to systems-based solutions. And we will narrow our incubation focus on fewer, more impactful projects.
  • Eliminating Complexity: We will reduce layers, eliminate overlapping areas of responsibility, stop non-essential work, and foster a culture of greater ownership and accountability. For example, we will consolidate Customer Success into the Sales, Marketing and Communications Group to streamline our go-to-market motions.
  • Reducing Capital and Other Costs: With the completion of our historic five-nodes-in-four-years roadmap clearly in sight, we will review all active projects and equipment so we begin to shift our focus toward capital efficiency and more normalized spending levels. This will reduce our 2024 capital expenditures by more than 20%, and we plan to reduce our non-variable cost of goods sold by roughly $1 billion in 2025.
  • Suspending Our Dividend: We will suspend our stock dividend beginning next quarter to prioritize investments in the business and drive more sustained profitability.
  • Maintaining Growth Investments: Our IDM2.0 strategy is unchanged. Having fought hard to reestablish our innovation engine, we will maintain the key investments in our process technology and core product leadership.


The Future

I have no illusions that the path in front of us will be easy. You shouldn’t either. This is a tough day for all of us and there will be more tough days ahead. But as difficult as all of this is, we are making the changes necessary to build on our progress and usher in a new era of growth.

When we began this journey, we set our sights high, knowing that Intel is a place where big ideas are born and the power of what’s possible triumphs over the status quo. After all, our mission is to create world-changing technologies that improve the lives of every person on the planet. And at our best, we have exemplified these ideals more than any company in the world.

To live up to this mission, we must continue to drive our IDM 2.0 strategy, which remains the same: re-establish process technology leadership; invest in at-scale, globally resilient supply chain by expanding manufacturing capacity in the U.S. and EU; become a world-class, leading-edge foundry for internal and external customers; rebuild product portfolio leadership; and deliver AI Everywhere.

Over the past few years, we have rebuilt a sustainable innovation engine that is largely in place and on track. It’s now time to focus on building the sustainable financial engine needed to drive our performance. We must improve our execution, adapt to new market realities and operate as a more agile company. That’s the spirit of the actions we are taking – knowing that the choices we make today, as difficult as they are, will strengthen our ability to serve our customers and grow our business for years to come.

As we take these next steps in our journey, let’s not forget that there has never been a greater need for what we do. The world will increasingly run on silicon – and the world needs a healthy and vibrant Intel. That’s why the work we are doing is so consequential. Not only are we remaking a great company, but we are also creating technology and manufacturing capabilities that will reshape the world for decades to come. And this is something we should never lose sight of as we push forward in pursuit of our goals.

We’ll talk more in a few hours. Please come with your questions so we can have an open and honest discussion about what comes next.
 
Intel foundry lost more money... its getting much worse .... Per Pat: Ramping new technologies is killing profits. Running old technologies is killing profits. Market is killing profits. I was waiting for him to say "no one is making money in this market"

We may soon see what Stacy's plan is. Right now Intel foundry looks like IBM2.0. See our website for scenarios and Intel WSPM ramp plan by fab www.mkwventures.com

I would review the 10Q. the finances are actually worse than shown today
 
  1. I worked at Intel from 1982 to 1986 when they:
  2. Froze hiring
  3. Cut all salaries by 10%, across the board
  4. Asked all salaried employees to work 2 more hours per day at no pay
  5. Did shut-downs, causing employees to file for unemployment benefits
  6. About 1/3 of the company quit
 
  1. I worked at Intel from 1982 to 1986 when they:
  2. Froze hiring
  3. Cut all salaries by 10%, across the board
  4. Asked all salaried employees to work 2 more hours per day at no pay
  5. Did shut-downs, causing employees to file for unemployment benefits
  6. About 1/3 of the company quit
Isn't that the time when they changed their business from memory to CPU?
 
Isn't that the time when they changed their business from memory to CPU?
That was during that period. I remember hearing a story that Andy Grove asked the head of TD at the time to end memory development. He refused saying that intel would have no product to sell, so Andy fired him. He then hired and fired TD executives until he got one who ended DRAM TD. If memory servers 3 TD heads were fired until Andy got someone who would go along with his/Moore's strategy shift.
 
That was during that period. I remember hearing a story that Andy Grove asked the head of TD at the time to end memory development. He refused saying that intel would have no product to sell, so Andy fired him. He then hired and fired TD executives until he got one who ended DRAM TD. If memory servers 3 TD heads were fired until Andy got someone who would go along with his/Moore's strategy shift.
When is pat going to do this fire the people who bought this onto themselves bad and are still there just hope they keep talent in core buisness and restructure also need to fire marketing people last i hear marketing went to a cruize trip on company budget
 
Intel foundry lost more money... its getting much worse .... Per Pat: Ramping new technologies is killing profits. Running old technologies is killing profits. Market is killing profits. I was waiting for him to say "no one is making money in this market"

We may soon see what Stacy's plan is. Right now Intel foundry looks like IBM2.0. See our website for scenarios and Intel WSPM ramp plan by fab www.mkwventures.com

I would review the 10Q. the finances are actually worse than shown today
And Intel said new US sanctions against China reduced its revenue too. It was a very depressed and unhappy earnings conference call.

Will Dow Jones Industrial Average replace Intel with another semiconductor company such as Nvidia, AMD, Broadcom, or Qualcomm? Intel's revenue growth, stock performance, and market cap are not representing the semiconductor industry anymore.
 
I
And Intel said new US sanctions against China reduced its revenue too. It was a very depressed and unhappy earnings conference call.

Will Dow Jones Industrial Average replace Intel with another semiconductor company such as Nvidia, AMD, Broadcom, or Qualcomm? Intel's revenue growth, stock performance, and market cap are not representing the semiconductor industry anymore.
I think Intel also said the market is tough LOL. the reply was "your competitors seem to be doing great" ...
 
And Intel said new US sanctions against China reduced its revenue too. It was a very depressed and unhappy earnings conference call.

Will Dow Jones Industrial Average replace Intel with another semiconductor company such as Nvidia, AMD, Broadcom, or Qualcomm? Intel's revenue growth, stock performance, and market cap are not representing the semiconductor industry anymore.
There is indisputably a CPU glut on the market, because PC/laptop sales are down, but CPU tapeout volumes never adjusted. This results in lots, and lots of old chips accumulating in inventories, never being sold out before the new chip generation arrives. So China sanctions have little to do with it.

It's just the war in Europe erased a double digit of the market overnight. Eastern Europe was a big market.
 
Next week, we’ll announce a companywide enhanced retirement offering for eligible employees and broadly offer an application program for voluntary departures. I believe that how we implement these changes is just as important as the changes themselves, and we will adhere to Intel values throughout this process.
I may be mistaken but during the investor call I understood that this action is NOT budgeted, i.e. there is not yet a precise number for the total cost at company level, did I understand correctly ?
 
Back
Top