Array
(
    [content] => 
    [params] => Array
        (
            [0] => /forum/index.php?threads/intel-does-it-again.20691/
        )

    [addOns] => Array
        (
            [DL6/MLTP] => 13
            [Hampel/TimeZoneDebug] => 1000070
            [SV/ChangePostDate] => 2010200
            [SemiWiki/Newsletter] => 1000010
            [SemiWiki/WPMenu] => 1000010
            [SemiWiki/XPressExtend] => 1000010
            [ThemeHouse/XLink] => 1000970
            [ThemeHouse/XPress] => 1010570
            [XF] => 2021370
            [XFI] => 1050270
        )

    [wordpress] => /var/www/html
)

Intel does it again

blueone

Well-known member

Intel Names Naga Chandrasekaran to Lead Foundry Manufacturing and Supply Chain​

SANTA CLARA, Calif., July 25, 2024 – Intel Corporation today announced the appointment of Dr. Naga Chandrasekaran as chief global operations officer, executive vice president and general manager of Intel Foundry Manufacturing and Supply Chain organization. Chandrasekaran joins Intel from Micron, where he served as senior vice president for Technology Development. He will be a member of Intel’s executive leadership team and report to CEO Pat Gelsinger.

Chandrasekaran succeeds Keyvan Esfarjani, who has decided to retire from Intel after nearly 30 years of dedicated service. Esfarjani’s distinguished career set a strong foundation for Intel Foundry, and his leadership in global supply chain resilience and manufacturing excellence has helped to position Intel’s business for long-term success. He will remain with Intel through the end of the year to ensure a seamless transition.

Chandrasekaran joins Intel on Aug. 12, and he will be responsible for Intel Foundry’s worldwide manufacturing operations, including Fab Sort Manufacturing, Assembly Test Manufacturing, strategic planning for Intel Foundry, corporate quality assurance and supply chain.

“Naga is a highly accomplished executive whose deep semiconductor manufacturing and technology development expertise will be a tremendous addition to our team,” Gelsinger said. “As we continue to build a globally resilient semiconductor supply chain and create the world’s first systems foundry for the AI era, Naga’s leadership will help us to accelerate our progress and capitalize on the significant long-term growth opportunities ahead.”

During more than 20 years at Micron, Chandrasekaran served in various senior leadership roles. Most recently, he led Micron’s global technology development and engineering efforts related to the scaling of current memory technologies, advanced packaging technology and emerging technology solutions. Previously, he served as Micron’s senior vice president of Process R&D and Operations. His experience spans the breadth of semiconductor manufacturing and R&D, including process and equipment development, device technology, mask technology and more.

Chandrasekaran earned a bachelor’s degree in mechanical engineering from the University of Madras; both a master’s and a doctorate degree in mechanical engineering from Oklahoma State University; a master’s degree in information and data science from the University of California, Berkeley; and dual executive MBAs from the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA-Anderson School of Management) and the National University of Singapore.

The Intel Foundry business encompasses Intel’s technology development, global manufacturing, and foundry customer service and ecosystem operations. It brings together all the critical components that fabless customers need to design and manufacture chips for a new era of AI-driven computing.

Dr. Chandrasekaran will work closely with the other Intel Foundry leaders: Dr. Ann Kelleher, executive vice president and general manager, Foundry Technology Development; Kevin O’Buckley, senior vice president and general manager of Foundry Services; and Lorenzo Flores, chief financial officer of Intel Foundry. Together, this team brings a breadth of foundry business and technical leadership experience that will help Intel achieve its goal of creating the first systems foundry for the AI era.

 
Keyvan is a great manager and leader and was a important person as Intel moved forward after IDM2.0 announcement. I am a bit concerned about the turnover. I am a huge Keyvan fan and I hope he enjoys his next challenge (or retirement if that is what it is)

Naga has tremendous experience at Micron and will bring a fresh perspective. I think Microns operations and cost effectiveness are world class so maybe he can help Intel make some serious progress on cost.
 
So many changes in the Intel Foundry. It will take me a while to understand the logic behind.
 
I am a bit concerned about the turnover.
The first thought I had when I read the news release was the title of this thread, and I think it is very concerning. I don't know Keyvan, but I would bet he's not the type to run away from one of the greatest challenges in the semiconductor industry. I suspect there is a lot more to this story.
 
The first thought I had when I read the news release was the title of this thread, and I think it is very concerning. I don't know Keyvan, but I would bet he's not the type to run away from one of the greatest challenges in the semiconductor industry. I suspect there is a lot more to this story.
Lets see what earnings show and whether Intel announces the changes to the Fab plans. That might give us some info. Listen to CFO comments. IMO Keyvan and Zinsner are the two most straightforward people at Intel.
 
Historically outsiders have not done well, Intel culture is strong and I am sure lots of the VPs underneath will have a very different background and culture and make the going more than just challenging. We saw some recent short timers in Keller and Murthy and I predict many more.

There have been a lot of outsiders hired from engineering level to executive level and without wholesale new vision and culture change I personally think this is a slow moving train wreck in the making when IDM2.0 can least afford it.
 
Stu leaving made alot more since. In hindsight he really did just look like the temporary man until the Tower acquisition could be closed. When that didn't happen Stu had to continue holding the helm until an experienced foundry guy could come in. Keyvan on the other hand is more of a head scratchier he isn't as old as Stu so he seemed to have many more years of service ahead of him. He was also fab manager of memory fabs D2 and Fab 68. If memory serves he was also a leader at IMF. On paper he seems like a good fit for improving efficiency for the logic side of the house in a world where iso process wafer cost is no longer at the bottom of the priority list.

Something that might fly under folk's radar is that this seems like a massive lose for Micron given their most important asset is their technology lead. Micron seems to have alot of TD superstars, so it might not be that big of a deal, but something worth monitoring given the vacuum cleaner of talent post PG intel has become.

Historically outsiders have not done well, Intel culture is strong and I am sure lots of the VPs underneath will have a very different background and culture and make the going more than just challenging. We saw some recent short timers in Keller and Murthy and I predict many more.
While those folks may have butted into how the fabs ran, all of those people were from and mostly worked on the chip design side though.
There have been a lot of outsiders hired from engineering level to executive level and without wholesale new vision and culture change I personally think this is a slow moving train wreck in the making when IDM2.0 can least afford it.
A seemingly sizable number of said outsiders on the fab side are folks that deserted intel during a period of toxic culture and neglect. As for a lack of new vision and culture change I don't know how you can reasonably say that with all of the public changes to how intel runs TD/MSO.
 
Historically outsiders have not done well, Intel culture is strong and I am sure lots of the VPs underneath will have a very different background and culture and make the going more than just challenging. We saw some recent short timers in Keller and Murthy and I predict many more.

There have been a lot of outsiders hired from engineering level to executive level and without wholesale new vision and culture change I personally think this is a slow moving train wreck in the making when IDM2.0 can least afford it.

I know two outsiders that have done quite well at Intel: Gary Patton and Suk Lee. Gary was from IBM/GF and Suk from TSMC/Cadence. Smart people go in with their eyes open and listen before speaking.

 
Last edited:
Back
Top