
Intel Appoints Stuart Pann to Lead Intel Foundry Services
Pann to accelerate development of Intel’s open systems foundry offering.

Array ( [content] => [params] => Array ( [0] => /forum/index.php?threads/intel-announced-new-ifs-leader.17651/ ) [addOns] => Array ( [DL6/MLTP] => 13 [Hampel/TimeZoneDebug] => 1000070 [SV/ChangePostDate] => 2010200 [SemiWiki/Newsletter] => 1000010 [SemiWiki/WPMenu] => 1000010 [SemiWiki/XPressExtend] => 1000010 [ThemeHouse/XLink] => 1000970 [ThemeHouse/XPress] => 1010570 [XF] => 2021370 [XFI] => 1050270 ) [wordpress] => /var/www/html )
I was hoping for someone with semi manufacturing experience, foundry experience, or even long and deep foundry customer experience. I could argue the latter is probably very important, because then you have a good feel for what IFS customers will really want.On the plus side he is a good friend of Pat Gelsinger.
I was hoping for someone with semi manufacturing experience, foundry experience, or even long and deep foundry customer experience. I could argue the latter is probably very important, because then you have a good feel for what IFS customers will really want.
I was hoping for someone with semi manufacturing experience, foundry experience, or even long and deep foundry customer experience. I could argue the latter is probably very important, because then you have a good feel for what IFS customers will really want.
There are VPs in IFS who have decent engineering backgrounds, some hired from Samsung, but no one I'm aware of has ever been a foundry user, as in leading significant chip design projects which used foundries. Advanced degrees usually don't impress me much on their own. Experience and accomplishments are what really impress me. I'm just not seeing the relevant experience levels in the people I see in IFS to make me more confident they know what to do to succeed. Perhaps I'm just being too demanding.I'm wondering why Intel can't find someone with both business experience and advanced engineering degree (master or PhD) to lead IFS?
If that's correct, the saga of IFS leadership does not reflect well on the Intel BoD.Could be a place holder until the Tower Semi deal closes?
If that's correct, the saga of IFS leadership does not reflect well on the Intel BoD.
"The Merger Agreement contains certain customary termination rights by either the Company or Parent, including if the Merger is not consummated by February 15, 2023, subject to two (2) three-month extensions in order to obtain required regulatory approvals."We will soon find out:
The Tower acquisition may close by the end of the half; And not a word about a change in conditions
The deal between Intel and Tower Tower +0.13%, was signed a year ago. But as time passed, concerns arose that the deal would not be completed, or at least would not be carried out at the set price. As a reminder, in February 2022, Intel and Tower reported a deal: the Israeli chip company was...semiwiki.com
Much of Gelsinger's platform is based on the fear of China's government disrupting the semi supply chain. The US government is putting a lot of pressure on China's semiconductor industry. Intel's SAMR overtures to continue investment in China will consequently ring hollow because of US government scrutiny. Consequently, I think that the CCP has more incentives to let the deal die than to approve it.Could be a place holder until the Tower Semi deal closes?