Array
(
    [content] => 
    [params] => Array
        (
            [0] => /forum/index.php?threads/broadcom-tsmc-weigh-possible-intel-deals-that-would-split-storied-chip-maker.22106/
        )

    [addOns] => Array
        (
            [DL6/MLTP] => 13
            [Hampel/TimeZoneDebug] => 1000070
            [SV/ChangePostDate] => 2010200
            [SemiWiki/Newsletter] => 1000010
            [SemiWiki/WPMenu] => 1000010
            [SemiWiki/XPressExtend] => 1000010
            [ThemeHouse/XLink] => 1000970
            [ThemeHouse/XPress] => 1010570
            [XF] => 2021770
            [XFI] => 1050270
        )

    [wordpress] => /var/www/html
)

Broadcom, TSMC Weigh Possible Intel Deals That Would Split Storied Chip Maker

Daniel Nenni

Admin
Staff member
Reuters

FILE PHOTO: A smartphone with a displayed Intel logo is placed on a computer motherboard in this illustration taken March 6, 2023. REUTERS/Dado Ruvic/Illustration/File Photo

(Reuters) -Intel's rivals Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co and Broadcom are each eyeing potential deals that would break the U.S. chipmaking icon in two, the Wall Street Journal reported on Saturday, citing people familiar with the matter.

Broadcom has been closely examining Intel's chip design and marketing business, the Journal reported, adding that the company had discussed a potential bid with its advisers but would likely only proceed if it found a partner for Intel's manufacturing business.

TSMC, the world's biggest contract chipmaker, has separately studied controlling some or all of Intel's chip plants, potentially as part of an investor consortium or other structure, the report said.

Broadcom and TSMC are not working together, and all of the talks so far are preliminary and largely informal, the Journal added.
Intel's interim executive chairman, Frank Yeary, has been leading the discussions with possible suitors and Trump administration officials, who are concerned about the fate of a company seen as critical to national security, the report said.

Yeary has been telling individuals close to him that he is most focused on maximizing value for Intel shareholders, the report added.
Intel, Broadcom, TSMC and the White House did not immediately respond to Reuters' requests for comment.

A White House official told Reuters on Friday that President Donald Trump's administration might not support Intel's U.S. chip factories being operated by a foreign entity after Bloomberg reported that TSMC was considering taking a controlling stake in Intel's factories at Trump's request.

The White House official said the Trump administration supported foreign companies investing and building in the U.S. but was "unlikely" to support a foreign firm operating Intel's factories.

Bloomberg reported that Trump's team raised the idea of a deal between the two firms in recent meetings with officials from TSMC who were receptive, citing a person familiar with the matter.

Intel was among the largest beneficiaries of the U.S. push to onshore critical chip manufacturing led by former President Joe Biden's administration.

The U.S. Commerce Department said in November it was finalizing a $7.86 billion government subsidy for Intel.
The company is one of a few chipmakers that design and manufacture semiconductors.

TSMC boasts a market valuation about eight times larger than that of Intel. The Taiwanese company's customers include AI chip leader Nvidia and AMD, which is Intel's fierce rival in PC and server markets.

Former Intel CEO Pat Gelsinger, who was ousted last year, set sky-high expectations for Intel's manufacturing and AI capabilities among major clients but fell short, leading to the chipmaker losing or canceling contracts, Reuters reported previously.

Intel's shares lost about 60% of their value last year as its capital-intensive bid to bolster manufacturing - a strategy championed by Gelsinger - strained the company's cash flow and ultimately led to it cutting about 15% of its workforce.

 
Hock Tan can turn Intel around, absolutely. There have been talks. Hock is waiting to be asked to intervene and that may have happened. Exciting times in semiconductors.
 
Hock Tan can turn Intel around, absolutely. There have been talks. Hock is waiting to be asked to intervene and that may have happened. Exciting times in semiconductors.
A hypothesized scenario:
1. Intel and TSMC form a joint venture, with Intel holding a controlling stake.
2. Broadcom takes over Intel, ensuring that the controlling stake in U.S. semiconductor manufacturing remains with a U.S. company.

In this scenario—where manufacturing and capex concerns are mitigated and debt burdens are deleveraged simultaneously—product businesses would be valued very differently. Hence, for Broadcom, this could be a cash-plus-equity deal.

Just some of my thoughts, not advice by any means.
 
Last edited:
Could it be as follows:
1. Intel and TSMC form a joint venture, with Intel holding a controlling stake.
2. Broadcom takes over Intel.
Thus, the controlling stake of U.S. semiconductor manufacturing remains with a U.S. company.
In this scenario, with manufacturing concerns mitigated and debt burden deleveraged simultaneously, product businesses will be valued very differently.
Hence, for Broadcom, this could be an equity deal.

That is certainly possible.

The one big thing that is missing in this equation is Intel Innovation. Intel has brought the semiconductor industry many things that TSMC has followed: HKMG, FinFETs, BSPD, just to name three. Do you really think the semiconductor industry will be a better place without Intel innovation?
 
That is certainly possible.

The one big thing that is missing in this equation is Intel Innovation. Intel has brought the semiconductor industry many things that TSMC has followed: HKMG, FinFETs, BSPD, just to name three. Do you really think the semiconductor industry will be a better place without Intel innovation?
I think eventually, the JV in the US will compete with TSMC (non-US). It doesn't make sense to have a monopoly in the market.

But this approach is the fastest way to shore-up US semi manufacturing against geo-risks imo.
 
Last edited:
I was thinking that if that happens, Broadcom could change its company name to Intel, as it has done similar thing before.
 
That is certainly possible.

The one big thing that is missing in this equation is Intel Innovation. Intel has brought the semiconductor industry many things that TSMC has followed: HKMG, FinFETs, BSPD, just to name three. Do you really think the semiconductor industry will be a better place without Intel innovation?
I guarantee you with the way Hock Manages the IP these things would be so much Safeguarded and they will milk it like no other that much I guarantee from his VMware acquisition.
 
From the news article, we can infer that one possible reason PG was let go is that he had caused significant losses for shareholders, many of whom are large funds.

If PG had prioritized shareholder value—even with the foundry strategy—I believe the outcome would have been different. The actual result was both a significant loss in equity and a missed opportunity in the AI trend. I’m not sure how he could have done anything differently, though, as I’ve always gotten the impression that he did not prioritize profit maximization but rather leaned toward pursuing what he believed was right. He focused on global fab construction projects rather than AI chip designs, provided extensive support for open-source efforts, offered generous redundancies, engaged in massive hiring, and was reluctant to implement headcount cuts, among other examples.

Ultimately, in my opinion, the management approach was flawed, as it left all stakeholders worse off. Employees (both past and current) and shareholders were not adequately rewarded for their efforts and time.

Following the VMware acquisition, if the Intel acquisition goes through, it will be the second company acquired by Broadcom with PG as the former CEO.
 
What about AMD ?! Don't Lisa Su have a saying on the the transfer of the X86 IP or more specifically the AMD64 instruction set.
 
Last edited:
Hock Tan can turn Intel around, absolutely. There have been talks. Hock is waiting to be asked to intervene and that may have happened. Exciting times in semiconductors.

OT but interesting he was the financial lead of Commodore International. Commodore's leadership completely ran the company into the ground through lack of investment in their own products. Of course the blame mostly rests on Irving Gould who owned Commodore.. though Commodore Europe actually outlived Commodore International as it was better run financially. To be completely fair, Hock only took over in 1992 which was probably the last year Commodore could have invested R&D properly to keep the company afloat after 1994.

30 years ago is a long time though and I'm sure he's learned a lot since then.

...

Amid financial and marketing mismanagement, computer pioneer Commodore closes its doors in 1994. Chief engineer Dave Haynie documents the company's last days through the eyes of the former employees.
 
Back
Top