Array
(
    [content] => 
    [params] => Array
        (
            [0] => /forum/threads/nvidia-ceo-says-he-has-plans-to-either-change-or-eliminate-every-single-persons-job-with-ai.25094/
        )

    [addOns] => Array
        (
            [DL6/MLTP] => 13
            [Hampel/TimeZoneDebug] => 1000070
            [SV/ChangePostDate] => 2010200
            [SemiWiki/Newsletter] => 1000010
            [SemiWiki/WPMenu] => 1000010
            [SemiWiki/XPressExtend] => 1000010
            [ThemeHouse/XLink] => 1000970
            [ThemeHouse/XPress] => 1010570
            [XF] => 2031070
            [XFI] => 1060170
        )

    [wordpress] => /var/www/html
)

Nvidia CEO Says He Has Plans to Either Change or Eliminate Every Single Person's Job With AI

Daniel Nenni

Founder
Staff member
1778611083420.png


Wall Street was bristling earlier this month as the chipmaker Nvidia behind the AI boom hit a record market value of $3.92 trillion, narrowly eclipsing Apple's record of $3.915 trillion set last December.

Just days later, Nvidia became the most valuable company in history, breaking the $4 trillion value ceiling and pushing CEO Jensen Huang up to being the world's sixth richest person, with a net worth of over $143 billion.

With his bag safely secured for the next several dozen generations, Huang celebrated his dynasty with an ominous warning: "everybody’s jobs will be affected."

Speaking with CNN's Fareed Zakaria, Huang repeated the spooky threat, which the broader tech sector has been dining out on for years.

At the center of Huang's prediction is productivity — the idea that AI will soon produce more market value than human workers, in less time and for a lower cost — though, like many of his peers, he also mixed in the confusing claim that there will still be room for human jobs, which will take as-yet-undisclosed new forms.

"Some jobs will be lost," Huang said. "Many jobs will be created and what I hope is that the productivity gains that we see in all the industries will lift society."

What "lifting society" means in practice remains to be seen. For all the billions of dollars poured into AI, our tech overlords have refused to use their fortunes to prepare us for the coming AI job apocalypse they insist is right around the corner. Instead, they've aligned with politicians bent on the destruction of the social safety net and the privatization of public services for the direct benefit of the ultra-wealthy.

Case in point, while Nvidia's stock price soared following Huang's headline-grabbing interview, the reality for workers is much less green. Were the CEO to ever talk to one of them, he might find that "productivity" is the last thing on anyone's mind.

In mid-2024, a study of 2,500 workers found that 77 percent reported decreased productivity and even higher workloads when using AI. Just under 40 percent of workers reported increased workloads caused explicitly by AI's sloppy mistakes, while 47 percent of respondents "didn't know how to achieve the expected productivity" gains with AI.

More recently, a survey of 25,000 employees across 7,000 workplaces by the National Bureau of Economic Research in Denmark found that enterprise AI contributed to paltry productivity gains overall compared to typical productivity growth over time.

For workers, "AI chatbots have had no significant impact on earnings or recorded hours in any occupation" — meaning that if AI is about to take everyone's jobs, it's being awfully quiet about it.

While loads of startup grifters and cynical PR spinsters have spent years pushing the AI automation story, the Nvidia CEO's forecast marks a noteworthy departure from his previous take on the issue.

Earlier in June, Huang pushed back hard on Anthropic CEO and fellow tech billionaire Dario Amodei's hairbrained statement that AI could automate half of all entry-level office jobs within five years — a claim so out of line with the tech's current abilities that it's almost meaningless.

"One, he believes that AI is so scary that only they [Anthropic] should do it," Huang said at the time. "Two, [he believes] that AI is so expensive, nobody else should do it... and three, AI is so incredibly powerful that everyone will lose their jobs, which explains why they should be the only company building it."

It was a harsh repudiation of Amodei's obnoxious AI fearmongering, and a seemingly sober take from someone in Huang's position — at least at the time.

Nvidia, it should be noted, currently controls 90 percent of the datacenter chip market, holding an immense position of power over the tech industry, the Fortune 500, and US military interests. Unlike the companies relying on his hardware, Huang's Nvidia depends less on an AI automation sales pitch, and more on a constant line of chip buyers.

 
Keep me posted on which jobs were eliminated. If your primary job is to summarize and recite documentation with some significant errors. you are getting replaced by CoPilot

AI still struggles with dates, facial recognition ..... and using company sales pitches, facebook and reddit as a reference. I am not that worried about job elimination. :ROFLMAO::LOL:

Gemini is probably stealing my IRA account and terminating my voter registration because I said that.


"Waymo, take me home, i dont feel well."

"I'm sorry Dave, I'm afraid I can't do that"
 
A heavy emphasis on the "change jobs" for sure. The jobs AI does not eliminate will be changed, absolutely. AI is definitely the next industrial revolution. At some point in time we will not be able to know if AI is writing articles but today it is still quite obvious.

AI for medical is great as long as you ask it what questions to ask your doctor versus taking it word for word. If you ask your doctor 10 AI based questions I guarantee you will get multiple "that's a good questions". The doctor will also know that you are using AI so maybe they will up their game a bit when speaking to you. Definitely a win-win.
 
View attachment 4555

Wall Street was bristling earlier this month as the chipmaker Nvidia behind the AI boom hit a record market value of $3.92 trillion, narrowly eclipsing Apple's record of $3.915 trillion set last December.

Just days later, Nvidia became the most valuable company in history, breaking the $4 trillion value ceiling and pushing CEO Jensen Huang up to being the world's sixth richest person, with a net worth of over $143 billion.

With his bag safely secured for the next several dozen generations, Huang celebrated his dynasty with an ominous warning: "everybody’s jobs will be affected."

Speaking with CNN's Fareed Zakaria, Huang repeated the spooky threat, which the broader tech sector has been dining out on for years.

At the center of Huang's prediction is productivity — the idea that AI will soon produce more market value than human workers, in less time and for a lower cost — though, like many of his peers, he also mixed in the confusing claim that there will still be room for human jobs, which will take as-yet-undisclosed new forms.

"Some jobs will be lost," Huang said. "Many jobs will be created and what I hope is that the productivity gains that we see in all the industries will lift society."

What "lifting society" means in practice remains to be seen. For all the billions of dollars poured into AI, our tech overlords have refused to use their fortunes to prepare us for the coming AI job apocalypse they insist is right around the corner. Instead, they've aligned with politicians bent on the destruction of the social safety net and the privatization of public services for the direct benefit of the ultra-wealthy.

Case in point, while Nvidia's stock price soared following Huang's headline-grabbing interview, the reality for workers is much less green. Were the CEO to ever talk to one of them, he might find that "productivity" is the last thing on anyone's mind.

In mid-2024, a study of 2,500 workers found that 77 percent reported decreased productivity and even higher workloads when using AI. Just under 40 percent of workers reported increased workloads caused explicitly by AI's sloppy mistakes, while 47 percent of respondents "didn't know how to achieve the expected productivity" gains with AI.

More recently, a survey of 25,000 employees across 7,000 workplaces by the National Bureau of Economic Research in Denmark found that enterprise AI contributed to paltry productivity gains overall compared to typical productivity growth over time.

For workers, "AI chatbots have had no significant impact on earnings or recorded hours in any occupation" — meaning that if AI is about to take everyone's jobs, it's being awfully quiet about it.

While loads of startup grifters and cynical PR spinsters have spent years pushing the AI automation story, the Nvidia CEO's forecast marks a noteworthy departure from his previous take on the issue.

Earlier in June, Huang pushed back hard on Anthropic CEO and fellow tech billionaire Dario Amodei's hairbrained statement that AI could automate half of all entry-level office jobs within five years — a claim so out of line with the tech's current abilities that it's almost meaningless.

"One, he believes that AI is so scary that only they [Anthropic] should do it," Huang said at the time. "Two, [he believes] that AI is so expensive, nobody else should do it... and three, AI is so incredibly powerful that everyone will lose their jobs, which explains why they should be the only company building it."

It was a harsh repudiation of Amodei's obnoxious AI fearmongering, and a seemingly sober take from someone in Huang's position — at least at the time.

Nvidia, it should be noted, currently controls 90 percent of the datacenter chip market, holding an immense position of power over the tech industry, the Fortune 500, and US military interests. Unlike the companies relying on his hardware, Huang's Nvidia depends less on an AI automation sales pitch, and more on a constant line of chip buyers.


This article was published on July 17, 2025. A year later, the situation has changed a lot. The adoption and impact of AI across many corporations, especially within IT departments, have become widespread.
 
Maybe a bit too cynical, but aren't there quite a few jobs that fit your above description? :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO:
you are 100% correct.... they will be eliminated and should be

As an example. When I started in tech, I could chose circuit design based on current ratios, calculate voltage drops, add up gate leakage numbers from FN tunneling and create a set of optimized standard cells. THEN spend 6 months laying them out in mask layers for the smallest test chips possible with contacts that can be edited to change currents ..... and still have room to put a Van Halen symbol in (See previous posts). about 1 year total work. It is now done in an hour by computers. So the world moved on.

Today there are people who google everything about memory technologies, summarize it, then put it in a report. No intelligence added...... a summary of the internets comments. I am perfectly happy that they are freed up to actually develop memory technologies or provide unique information on the market from their own studies.

Add that to the "AI is not really intelligent" and hilarious hallucinations and the world will survive just fine LOL
 
You must be pretty old, to be referencing a 1968 movie for humor. And we still don't have practical holographic memory... :rolleyes:
first time I saw 2001 was 50 years after its release .... its a good quote.

I also quote Wizard of Oz and that was made two or three years before I was born. :LOL: :ROFLMAO:
 
Computers affected every single job when they.. became a thing.

I don't like aging, but it's going to be fun to see this pattern for possibly a second time. LLMs are afterall, just more intuitive computers, with a lot more transistors thrown at them than we need for "basic computers".

At the dawn of the computer age, quite a lot of big companies either didn't make it or transformed to stay relevant. We're going to see that again in the next decade, too. Intel x86 is IBM of the 1970s, and Nvidia could end up being Atari or Apple.
 
Back
Top