Array
(
    [content] => 
    [params] => Array
        (
            [0] => /forum/threads/intel-will-outsource-marketing-to-accenture-and-ai-laying-off-many-of-its-own-workers.23069/
        )

    [addOns] => Array
        (
            [DL6/MLTP] => 13
            [Hampel/TimeZoneDebug] => 1000070
            [SV/ChangePostDate] => 2010200
            [SemiWiki/Newsletter] => 1000010
            [SemiWiki/WPMenu] => 1000010
            [SemiWiki/XPressExtend] => 1000010
            [ThemeHouse/XLink] => 1000970
            [ThemeHouse/XPress] => 1010570
            [XF] => 2021770
            [XFI] => 1050270
        )

    [wordpress] => /var/www/html
)

Intel will outsource marketing to Accenture and AI, laying off many of its own workers

XYang2023

Well-known member
Intel notified its marketing employees this week that it plans to outsource many of their jobs to the consulting firm Accenture as new CEO Lip-Bu Tan works to slash costs and improve the chipmaker’s operations.

The company said it believes Accenture, using artificial intelligence, will do a better job connecting with customers. It says it will tell most marketing employees by July 11 whether it plans to lay them off.

“The transition of our marketing and operations functions will result in significant changes to team structures, including potential headcount reductions, with only lean teams remaining,” Intel told employees in a notice describing its plans. The Oregonian/OregonLive reviewed a copy of the material.

Intel declined to say how many workers will lose their jobs or how many work in its marketing organization, which employs people at sites around the globe, including in Oregon. But it acknowledged its relationship with Accenture in a statement to The Oregonian/OregonLive.

“As we announced earlier this year, we are taking steps to become a leaner, faster and more efficient company,” Intel said. “As part of this, we are focused on modernizing our digital capabilities to serve our customers better and strengthen our brand. Accenture is a longtime partner and trusted leader in these areas and we look forward to expanding our work together.”

Hired in March, Tan is a veteran semiconductor industry executive but he’s an outsider at Intel — the company’s first CEO who had never worked there. And he appears to be radically changing how the company functions.

Intel told workers the move to outsource its marketing work is an extension of that work.

“While we expect that lower costs will be a natural end result of this decision, the reality is that we need to change our ‘go to market’ model to be more responsive to what customers want,” the company told marketing employees. “We have received feedback that our decision-making is too slow, our programs are too complex, and our competitors are moving faster.”

Intel is struggling to recover from years of technological setbacks, which have cost it market share in PCs and data centers and left it shut out of the booming business of advanced artificial intelligence. The company’s sales have fallen by a third in recent years, leaving Intel unprofitable and facing an uncertain outlook.

“We are partnering with Accenture to leverage AI-driven technologies with the goals of moving faster, simplifying processes and reflecting best practices, while also managing our spending,” Intel told employees in this week’s notice.

The company seemed to raise the possibility that it will ask some workers to train their replacements at Accenture, helping educate contractors on Intel’s operations “during the transition process.”

In April, Tan told workers to expect significant job cuts in the coming months. Details of his plans are now emerging across Intel’s various business units.

Intel notified workers in its manufacturing business last weekend that it plans to lay off as many as a fifth of them beginning in July — cuts that figure to cut several thousand jobs, at least. Tan is overhauling Intel’s operations, cutting jobs and eliminating layers of management in hopes that will accelerate the company’s innovation.

Many companies are experimenting with artificial intelligence capabilities and there is some evidence that hiring has slowed in some sectors as businesses delegate jobs historically done by people to computers. Amazon CEO Andy Jassy told employees this week that he expects artificial intelligence will reduce his company’s workforce.

Intel’s decision to outsource key marketing work represents a gamble that a contractor can excel in a key corporate function and a bet that artificial intelligence has advanced to the point where it makes many traditional roles obsolete.

“AI can help us analyze large amounts of information faster, automate routine tasks, personalize customer experiences, and make smarter business decisions,” Intel told marketing workers. “Our goal is to empower teams with more time to focus on strategic, creative and high-impact work by automating repetitive or time-consuming tasks.”

 
I guess being replaced by AI is better than being laid off and not being replaced. :sneaky:

In the over/under betting I still say over 20% of Intel employees will be gone by year end.

This is what happens when you go out and listen to customers and partners:

“We have received feedback that our decision-making is too slow, our programs are too complex, and our competitors are moving faster.”

The transformation has begun, go Intel!
 
I guess being replaced by AI is better than being laid off and not being replaced. :sneaky:

In the over/under betting I still say over 20% of Intel employees will be gone by year end.

This is what happens when you go out and listen to customers and partners:

“We have received feedback that our decision-making is too slow, our programs are too complex, and our competitors are moving faster.”

The transformation has begun, go Intel!
Intel should ask Accenture to use Intel Gaudi for this task. Such that, it would be a concrete case study for other potential customers of Gaudi.
 
Hired in March, Tan is a veteran semiconductor industry executive but he’s an outsider at Intel — the company’s first CEO who had never worked there. And he appears to be radically changing how the company functions.
Excuse me? Tan was a member of the Intel Board of Directors. That is "working there". Tan also had a similar history at Cadence, where he was only on the BoD before becoming CEO. I wouldn't let Rogoway write for our homeowners' association newsletter.

Nonetheless, I think outsourcing marketing is a weird idea. Not that I'm arguing that Intel marketing didn't need a weight-loss program, I think it did, but the notion of out-sourcing your corporate communications to a bunch of consultants with only indirect skin in the game is questionable. And Accenture's work will need to be managed and reviewed by Intel staff. So Intel will probably still have a significant number of marketing people, and probably the most senior ones. Finally, if a company has flawed technology and product strategies no one can market their way out of those problems.

As for the AI aspect of the plan, the output of LLMs needs to be reviewed by experts, otherwise the errors and hallucinations are going to be very embarrassing in product marketing. I wonder how that process will work? I wonder if Tan and his staff has run a test case yet (I doubt it, due to lack of time) to prove AI is viable in this space yet.

I predict a very messy and inefficient transition process is about to start.
 
Excuse me? Tan was a member of the Intel Board of Directors. That is "working there". Tan also had a similar history at Cadence, where he was only on the BoD before becoming CEO. I wouldn't let Rogoway write for our homeowners' association newsletter.

Nonetheless, I think outsourcing marketing is a weird idea. Not that I'm arguing that Intel marketing didn't need a weight-loss program, I think it did, but the notion of out-sourcing your corporate communications to a bunch of consultants with only indirect skin in the game is questionable. And Accenture's work will need to be managed and reviewed by Intel staff. So Intel will probably still have a significant number of marketing people, and probably the most senior ones. Finally, if a company has flawed technology and product strategies no one can market their way out of those problems.

As for the AI aspect of the plan, the output of LLMs needs to be reviewed by experts, otherwise the errors and hallucinations are going to be very embarrassing in product marketing. I wonder how that process will work? I wonder if Tan and his staff has run a test case yet (I doubt it, due to lack of time) to prove AI is viable in this space yet.

I predict a very messy and inefficient transition process is about to start.
Is serving on the board where you only attend a meeting every other month the same as working at a company?
 
Is serving on the board where you only attend a meeting every other month the same as working at a company?
It depends on the company. Some BoDs are mostly for show to approve the agenda of someone who is probably the CEO and BoD chair. But that's not how the Intel BoD worked in my experience. There are many issues that come before the BoD. Numerous email threads flying around. Lots of controversy in numerous areas. Yes, face-to-face board meetings aren't that frequent because they're high overhead for board members who have to travel (and most have full-time plus jobs). A board member also gets global views of business plans, compensation plans, financial plans, legal issues, personnel questions, etc., that even low to mid-level VPs don't get. So, at Intel, I think it is like working there.
 
Last edited:
"The company said it believes Accenture, using artificial intelligence, will do a better job connecting with customers"

...

This reads like a decision made by leaders who read "CEO Weekly" and pass around pages of the magazine to their peers as if anything new is the best thing ever. I have no doubt that Intel's marketing needs a full reboot (the brand is in tatters), but.. I can't think of anything good to say about the sentence above.
 
“We have received feedback that our decision-making is too slow, our programs are too complex, and our competitors are moving faster.”

Surely they've known for well over a decade and just chosen to ignore the consequences - too many people thought it didn't matter enough for too long.

On the other hand, if this really is how they've been operating, this is something that's fixable and could have a large upside without requiring much investment. Not sure that AI is the answer and highly sceptical that Accenture will be. Getting the right people in (and equally the wrong people out) should be part of it.
 
It depends on the company. Some BoDs are mostly for show to approve the agenda of someone who is probably the CEO and BoD chair. But that's not how the Intel BoD worked in my experience. There are many issues that come before the BoD. Numerous email threads flying around. Lots of controversy in numerous areas. Yes, face-to-face board meetings aren't that frequent because they're high overhead for board members who have to travel (and most have full-time plus jobs). A board member also gets global views of business plans, compensation plans, financial plans, legal issues, personnel questions, etc., that even low to mid-level VPs don't get. So, at Intel, I think it is like working there.
I'm not a sales or marketing person, but I suspect that marketing may not be particularly difficult for AI to handle. In fact, hallucination can sometimes contribute to creativity. For fact-checking, RAG (Retrieval-Augmented Generation) can be used—i.e., generated content can be verified against internal technical documents and legal policies. You're right that the final output still needs to be reviewed by a human for accuracy.

If AI cannot perform this kind of task, then the current valuation of Nvidia may be a serious bubble.
 
I'm not a sales or marketing person, but I suspect that marketing may not be particularly difficult for AI to handle. In fact, hallucination can sometimes contribute to creativity. For fact-checking, RAG (Retrieval-Augmented Generation) can be used—i.e., generated content can be verified against internal technical documents and legal policies. You're right that the final output still needs to be reviewed by a human for accuracy.

If AI cannot perform this kind of task, then the current valuation of Nvidia may be a serious bubble.
Nvidia sells you picks and spades. Whether you can use them to find gold is a different story.
 
If AI cannot perform this kind of task, then the current valuation of Nvidia may be a serious bubble.
LLMs are being used for thousands of non-critical tasks, sometimes nefarious tasks (fakes of all sorts), so for more informal cases (and I consider coding assistants and stuff like that to increase productivity informal) there is a huge demand for Nvidia's products based on what many millions of people actually use AI for today. However, I don't think it's a stretch to say that a lot of the demand for AI hardware is what it is thought AI could be in the not so distant future. Even national governments are falling for it, hence we see sovereign AI investments. In the financial world this phenomenon is called FOMO (fear of missing out). LLMs can do a lot of things which look overwhelming to people who don't understand how they work. They can pass all sorts of tests that only very intelligent and highly skilled humans can pass, which fools people, because they don't understand the difference between structured constrained problem spaces and unconstrained problem spaces. It isn't much of a leap in non-expert minds to the creation of a super-human artificial general intelligence (AGI). It is thought the first country that creates an AGI will dominate the world. Personally, I don't see a path to that dream from where we are, but I'm just a dumb old retired guy, so what do I know?

So, is Nvidia a $3T bubble? I don't think so. Not unless another company creates hardware and software that exceeds what Nvidia can do to help realize the dream, and there's no sign of that yet. So far, mostly cheaper ways, mostly not better ways. Cerebras looks like the most interesting up and comer.
 
I am sure there is more to the Accenture deal than meets the eye.

Accenture is the worlds largest IT consultancy and now they are incentivized to sell Intel, so there is a conflict of interest built into this deal. It has the potential backfire on both Intel and Accenture.
 
I don't think it is particular hard to do. You first need to understand the tasks that Intel used to carry. Then automate according to tasks. Accenture does not need to do everything. It can rely on salesforce and various other agents to make it work.

The objective is to reduce number of headcounts, not really about full automation.

I am sure Accenture has already done similar things for other companies.
 
Back
Top